quickly.
I have taken an intro Django course (at a PyCon), have built a few
things with it (not nearly as many as I have w/ web2py), and I _can_
do things in it - so I'll let someone else w/ django "miles" under
their belt speak their mind.
- Yarko
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 19, 2:48 pm, Yarko wrote:
> On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
>
> > Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> > know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> > more intellectual reasoning
On Dec 19, 8:39 pm, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:48:07 -0800, Yarko wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
>
> It seems that this is the biggest issue surrounding web2py, from my
> research, is the ability to customize the defaults (the easy
) over Java, or Python over Java --> the decrease in time spent
worrying about setup of the system used to address a given problem/
algorithm.
Easier / trivial setup in tool is good when it accomplishes what you
need (e.g. gets out of your way, leaves more attention to the problem
at hand).
- Yarko
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
devised by "those who know the tools", and inspected and reviewed
by the community - also helpful). Anything else is just opinion and
talk - and to be sure, there is room for opinion, talk, and
preferences (no one really _needs_ to convince a Ford owner to drive a
Chevy - until some level of bankruptcy happens, it really doesn't
matter). But even there, it is a benefit to the community in general
to separate the talk from the real deciding factors. Thankfully,
preference will always play a part.
Kind regards,
- Yarko
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
