the syntax
of list comprehensions.
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e/programs/libs
is usually released under which license.
Thanks for your help,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ndom numbers.
At the top of your documentation, there is a link "overview",
which is broken:
See _overview_ for a quick start.
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(
HO always a better programming style
to use "subprocess".
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
al than
"if a", because the latter also works with container-like objects
that have a concept of emptiness, but not of length.
However, this case is less likely to happen than shooting yourself
in the foot by passing accidently an iterator to the function
without getting an exception. I think, this flaw in Python is deep
enough to justify the "len() > 0" kludge.
IMHO, that flaw of Python should be documented in a PEP as it violates
Python's priciple of beeing explicit. It also harms duck typing.
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
Administrator
NotJustHosting GbR
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ith all other points, I don't think that it's less
error-prone. See my other posting where I worked out this a flaw
of Python.
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
Administrator
NotJustHosting GbR
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Python, and any other language.
Any programming language allows you to do strange/stupid stuff. But none
of them encourages it. So I can't see your point in any way.
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\righ
ritance, closures and similar mechanisms save a
lot of work, too, they do their job even better than a code generator,
and they are a charm to maintain.
Even the "magic" (AKA meta-classes :-)) may be hard, but it's usually a
much simpler and cleaner approach than a co
t be a disadvantage. (Instead, if would be
a great advantage!)
So you have to decide yourself: Do you really need the description files
to be read in on-the-fly? Then stick with your own language. Are your
definition files more like modules/extensions which are installes together
with the source files? Th
rse: If you
don't create backup files before removing code ...
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
return cmp(...) or cmp (...) or cmp(...) or ...
I'm not sure whether this pattern is already a "common recipe", but
I found it to be a very nice idea. :-)
Any opinions?
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
re looking for.
That's an excellent idea! Thanks a lot. I really didn't think of the "key="
argument.
Greets,
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\ri
he database. Okay, one could use transactions and rollback", but I
think, my point is clear now.
Nevertheless, I think you idea is very interesting. Is there any "real"
application where normalizing just for sorting would be reasonable?
Greets,
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(
create a tuple, or does it just return
a tuple which is present anyway?
Greets,
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e.
I.e., when I sort some strings case-insensitive, I don't want my resulting
(sorted) list to contain only lowercase string. But that's what I would
get if I used the algorithm you described above.
Greets,
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\}\right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
hrone, especially because you don't need
to deal with quoting issues, and because you have an initial
syntax check of your Python code which is bypassed when using exec.
Similarly, try to avoid system() whenever possible.
Greets,
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\v
16 matches
Mail list logo