On Oct 4, 4:21 pm, "gord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a complete novice in the study of Python, I am asking myself where this
> language is superior or better suited than others. For example, all I see in
> the tutorials are lots of examples of list processing, arithmetic
> calculations - all
MonkeeSage wrote:
> On Oct 6, 6:27 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
> > The following line of lightly munged code was found in a publicly
> > available Python library...
>
> Yes, this violates the Holy, Inspired, Infallible Style Guide (pbuh),
> which was written by the very finger of God when
Dustan wrote:
> According to the following page on Wikipedia:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Python_%28programming_language%29#Future_development
> reduce is going to be removed in python 3.0. It talks of an
> accumulation loop; I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. So,
>
>
MonkeeSage wrote:
> OK, so the devil always loses. ;P
>
> Regards,
> Jordan
Huh? The devil always loses? *turns TV on, watches the news, turns TV
off* Nope, buddy. Quite the contrary.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fabian Steiner wrote:
> I often have to deal with strings like "PCI:2:3.0" or "PCI:3.4:0" and
> need the single numbers as tuple (2, 3, 0) or (3, 4, 0). Is there any
> simple way to achieve this? So far I am using regular expressions but I
> would like to avoid them ...
>
> Regards,
> Fabian Steine
Steve Bergman wrote:
> As I study Python, I am trying to develop good, Pythonic, habits. For
> one thing, I am trying to keep Guido's the style guide in mind.
>
> And I know that it starts out saying that it should not be applied in
> an absolute fashion.
>
> However, I am finding that the 79 char
This is not strictly python related, but it's not strictly TDD related
either. Anyway, here it goes.
There's something that I was never quite sure how to handle with test
units: How to handle the test unit refactoring after a method
extraction.
Let's say that you have a function foo() that does A
On May 3, 9:21 pm, Andy Terrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay does anyone know how to decorate class member functions?
>
> The following code gives me an error:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "decorators2.py", line 33, in
> s.update()
> File "decorators2.py", line 13, in
On May 3, 9:33 pm, Virgil Dupras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 3, 9:21 pm, Andy Terrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Okay does anyone know how to decorate class member functions?
>
> > The following code gives me an error:
>
> &g
On May 3, 9:21 pm, Andy Terrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay does anyone know how to decorate class member functions?
>
> The following code gives me an error:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "decorators2.py", line 33, in
> s.update()
> File "decorators2.py", line 13, in
On May 13, 11:44 am, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PEP 1 specifies that PEP authors need to collect feedback from the
> community. As the author of PEP 3131, I'd like to encourage comments
> to the PEP included below, either here (comp.lang.python), or to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In
On May 31, 3:59 am, Andreas Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the following quite cryptic code, which basically reads the
> first column of some_file into a set.
> In Python I am used to seeing much more verbose/explicit code. However,
> the example below _may_ actually be faster t
On Mar 7, 7:14 pm, "Sergio Correia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for an easy way to flatten a two level list like this
>
> spam = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9], [10, 11, 12]]
>
> Into something like
> eggs = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]
>
> There are *no* special c
On Mar 21, 9:24 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcin Ciura wrote:
> > Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > x, y, z = 1, 2, 3
> > x = y = z
> > x, y, z
> >> (3, 3, 3)
>
> >> I certainly wouldn't expect to get (2, 3, 3).
>
> > Neither would I. I must have expressed myself not clearl
On Mar 21, 10:05 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Virgil Dupras wrote:
> > On Mar 21, 9:24 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Marcin Ciura wrote:
> >>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >>>>>>> x, y, z =
>From your example, if you want to group every path that has the same
last 9 characters, a simple solution could be something like:
groups = {}
for path in paths:
group = groups.setdefault(path[-9:],[])
group.append(path)
I didn't actually test it, there ight be syntax errors.
J wrote:
>
On Feb 5, 5:48 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want to have a str with custom methods, but I have this problem:
>
> class myStr(str):
> def hello(self):
> return 'hello '+self
>
> s=myStr('world')
> print s.hello() # prints 'hello world'
> s=s.upper()
> print s.he
On Feb 25, 1:00 pm, "Paddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I blogged on finding a new-to-me feature of Python, in that you are
> allowed to nnest parameter definitions:
>
> >>> def x ((p0, p1), p2):
>
> ... return p0,p1,p2
> ...>>> x(('Does', 'this'), 'work')
>
> ('Does', 'this', 'work')
>
>
>
>
On Dec 7, 9:37 am, Lars Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a function that looks like this:
>
> def Chooser(color):
>
> if color == "RED":
> x = term.RED
> elif color == "BLUE":
> x = term.BLUE
> elif color == "GREEN":
>
On Dec 7, 9:05 am, Matt_D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello there, this is my first post to the list. Only been working with
> Python for a few days. Basically a complete newbie to programming.
>
> I'm working with csv module as an exercise to parse out a spreadsheet
> I use for work.(I am an edit
On Dec 7, 9:03 am, grbgooglefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 3:07 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > En Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:24:57 -0300, grbgooglefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > escribió:
>
> > > On Dec 7, 12:17 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wro
On Dec 10, 8:15 am, farsheed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a software and I want to protect it so can not be cracked
> easily. I wrote it in python and compile it using py2exe. what is the
> best way in your opinion?
Don't. This is a fight you already lost. Besides, people who crack
softwar
On Dec 9, 1:15 am, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Jones a écrit :
>
>
>
> > Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
> >>class A(object):
> >> @apply
> >> def a():
> >> def fget(self):
> >> return self._a
> >> def fset(self, val):
> >> self._a = val
> >> re
On Dec 10, 9:55 am, farsheed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. But I ask this question technically, I mean I know nothing is
> uncrackable and popular softwares are not well protected. But my
> software is not that type and I don't want this specific software
> popular.
> It is some kind of in h
On Jan 24, 7:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry if this is a bit off topic but as unit testing is such a
> cornerstone of python development I thought a few of you may be able
> to share your knowledge/experiences.
>
> I like the concept of TDD but find it difficult to put into practice
On Jan 24, 1:30 pm, Roel Schroeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Virgil Dupras schreef:
>
> > I know what you mean by top-down vs. bottom-up and I used to have the
> > same dilemma, but now I would tend to agree with Albert. Your issue
> > with top-down or bottom-up is
On 06 Dec 2008, at 20:38, Warren DeLano wrote:
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:22:38 -0800
From: Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "as" keyword woes
To: python-list@python.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm still in the dark as to what type of data could
even inspire t
On Apr 24, 10:22 pm, Brian Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My example:
>
> class A(object):
>
> def __init__(self, name):
> self.__name = name
>
> def getName(self):
> return self.__name
>
> class B(A):
>
> def __init__(self,name=None):
>
On Apr 25, 4:03 pm, Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to subclass list so that each value in it is calculated at call
> time. I had initially thought I could do that by defining my own
> __getitem__, but 1) apparently that's deprecated (although I can't
> find that; got a link?), a
29 matches
Mail list logo
