I have followed this discussion since the beginning, and I have been intrigued.
I recently read a relevant blog post that I'd like to share. It has arguments
for both sides: http://nullprogram.com/blog/2017/03/30/.
2017-05-20 0:01 GMT+02:00 eryk sun
mailto:eryk...@gmail.com>>:
On Fri, May 19, 2
It seems like you are trying to run easy_install while running the Python
interpreter. I am not familiar with easy_install, but my guess would be to run
it outside the interpreter, in the command prompt.
2017-06-12 16:47 GMT+02:00 David Marquand
mailto:dbmarqu...@gmail.com>>:
I am trying to lea
It seems like you are trying to run easy_install while running the Python
interpreter. I am not familiar with easy_install, but my guess would be to run
it outside the interpreter, in the command prompt.
2017-06-12 16:47 GMT+02:00 David Marquand
mailto:dbmarqu...@gmail.com>>:
I am trying to lea
>Why are you trying to compile Python manually? You should use Homebrew to
>install Python in 99% of cases. (The package is python3)
I'm not the person you answered, but I can explain why I do things that are not
"optimal" or "easy" or "best".
I am interested, I want to learn something, I think
>Why are you trying to compile Python manually? You should use Homebrew to
>install Python in 99% of cases. (The package is python3)
I'm not the person you answered, but I can explain why I do things that are not
"optimal" or "easy" or "best".
I am interested, I want to learn something, I think
>Why are you trying to compile Python manually? You should use Homebrew to
>install Python in 99% of cases. (The package is python3)
I'm not the person you answered, but I can explain why I do things that are not
"optimal" or "easy" or "best".
I am interested, I want to learn something, I think
