-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
When transmitting via UDP to a PLC, I run into a strange problem
where socket.sendto returns double the number of characters sent in the
datagram. I thought this was an error and used Wireshark to sniff the
connection and discovered that it di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:07:58 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> The docs for 'sendto' say:
>
> """The socket should not be connected to a remote socket, since
> the destination socket is specified by address."""
>
> Could your problem be caus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:03:58 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> On 21/10/2010 15:57, Todd Walter wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:07:58 +0100
> > MRAB wrote:
> >
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:03:58 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> On 21/10/2010 15:57, Todd Walter wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:07:58 +0100
> > MRAB wrote:
> >
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:03 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> On 21/10/2010 21:05, Todd Walter wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:03:58 +0100
> > MRAB wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:03 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> On 21/10/2010 21:05, Todd Walter wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:03:58 +0100
> > MRAB wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:03 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> On 21/10/2010 21:05, Todd Walter wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:03:58 +0100
> > MRAB wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:53:45 -0400
Tom Pacheco wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 4:05 PM, Todd Walter wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:03:58 +0100
> > MRAB wrote:
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you all for your help, I now have a functioning interface. As it
turns out, trying to do things the "correct" way was wrong. The timing
was so tight that doing anything (such as traversing the while-loop
once) instead of a read immediately afte
