Re: merits of Lisp vs Python

2006-12-09 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:43:34 +0100, Bjoern Schliessmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >samantha wrote: > >> What are you? A pointy haired boss? > >What are you? A 12 year old that has just learned to use Google >Groups? 8) Says a person with a 13-line sig. --

Re: merits of Lisp vs Python

2006-12-09 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:36:02 +1100, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:38:02 -0800, Wolfram Fenske wrote: > >> if Common Lisp didn't have CLOS, its object system, I could write my own >> as a library and it would be just as powe

Re: merits of Lisp vs Python

2006-12-09 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 04:24:43 +1100, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:00:10 +, Timofei Shatrov wrote: > >> On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:36:02 +1100, Steven D'Aprano >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: merits of Lisp vs Python

2006-12-11 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On 11 Dec 2006 00:27:28 -0800, "Ravi Teja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: > >That's a lot of hate in 2 sentences for judging a novel feature you >barely came across. > But, you have to admit that it looks horrible (at least at the first glance). If there's some p

Re: merits of Lisp vs Python

2006-12-13 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:07:01 +1300, greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >Robert Uhl wrote: > >> o Symbols >> >> In Lisp, a symbol is essentially a hashed string; > >Are you aware that strings can be interned in Python? >Furthermore, any string literal in the sour

Re: merits of Lisp vs Python

2006-12-13 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On 12 Dec 2006 18:03:49 -0800, "Paddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >There are a lot of people that use Wikipedia. I think some of them >might want to learn to program. I think you misunderstood the goal of Wikipedia. It is not to teach people programming. >I

Re: The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

2007-06-24 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:57:20 -, Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >On Jun 23, 2:04 am, Robert Uhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Of course, emacs doesn't take years of mastery. It takes 30, 40 >> minutes. > >I gave it twice that, and it failed to grow on

Re: The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

2007-06-27 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:07:04 -, Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >"Stubbornly insisting on being odd" appears to be a particularly >prevalent character flaw among the geeknoscenti. > Oh the irony. -- |Don't believe this - you're not worthless

Re: The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

2007-06-27 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:04:39 -, Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: > >> With a PS file you can do just one thing, execute it. It's a program, >> did you know ? > >For which you need an interpreter. Such as Ghostscript. Which is a >pain to install and a bi

Re: need scsh in a wikip article

2007-09-12 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:10:09 -0700, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >> someone please add scsh there. > >Why can't YOU add scsh or I am missing something?? > Maybe he is banned? -- |Don't believe this - you're not worthless ,gr--

Re: What are OOP's Jargons and Complexities

2007-03-30 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:48:05 GMT, "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: >Xah Lee wrote: > >> So, a simple code like this in normal languages: >> becomes in Java: >> >> > >Only when written by someone almost entirely ignorant of Java. > Which is the st

Re: The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

2007-09-30 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:43:39 +0200, Klaus Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: > >that's because it's immoral not to give it all > >which is necessary in a moral culture. >Only an immoral culture may accept non-disclosure > >private property is unethical > I

Re: Distributed RVS, Darcs, tech love

2007-10-21 Thread Timofei Shatrov
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:04:06 -0700, llothar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this message: > >> I love math. I respect Math. I'm nothing but a menial servant to >> Mathematics. > >Programming and use cases are not maths. Many mathematics are >the worst programmers i've seen becau