On 5/17/2011 5:27 PM, Corey Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/17/2011 04:55 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Apparently, it's not well documented. If you check PEP 358
you'll find it.
~Ethan~
Agreed, it looks like it should be mentioned in bytes.__doc__ about the
On 5/18/2011 5:24 AM, lkcl wrote:
There seem to be two somewhat separate requirement issues: the
interpreter binary and the language version.
a) at the moment a http://python.org 2.N interpreter is required to
actually run the translator. if you use http://python.org 2.5 or 2.6
you do not
On 5/18/2011 9:42 AM, lkcl wrote:
he's got a good point, terry. breaking backwards-compatibility was a
completely mad and incomprehensible decision.
I see that I should take everything you (or Harris) say with a big grain
of salt;-). You just gave me a lecture about the impossibility of do
On 5/21/2011 10:46 AM, John J Lee wrote:
In the absence of an explicit interface declaration (have any standards
emerged for that in Python 3, BTW?), the use of len() does give you some
information about the interface, which sometimes makes it easier to
change the function.
I'm sure you fully u
On 5/21/2011 8:03 PM, bvdp wrote:
Yes, I can confirm that both the lambda and setting the class to:
class selectFav(object):
One of the purposes and advantages of Python 3 is having only one class
system. Best to always use new-style classes in Python 2.2+ unless you
understand and nee
On 5/21/2011 10:20 PM, bvdp wrote:
One of the purposes and advantages of Python 3 is having only one class
system. Best to always use new-style classes in Python 2.2+ unless you
understand and need old-style classes (and need should be never for most
people).
Thanks for this. I'll keep it in
On 5/22/2011 2:34 PM, Patrick Sabin wrote:
I wanted to register my project (epdb) in pypi. Unfortunately there
already exists a project with the same name. It is not possible for me
to change the name of the project, because I used it in multiple
writings. Any ideas how I can deal with the situat
On 5/22/2011 3:44 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I've noticed that on many Perl mailing lists the list members talk
very rarely about Python,
Interesting. I learned about Python on comp.lang.perl, but that was over
a decade ago.
but only on this Python mailing list I read
many discussions abo
On 5/22/2011 5:57 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
Stef Mientki wrote:
must of us will not use single bits these days,
but at first sight, this looks funny :
a=2
b=6
a and b
6
a& b
2
a or b
2
a | b
6
Change the order of the operands and see what happens.
or change a,b to 1,2
On 5/23/2011 1:31 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I am talking about a simple way of creating a hash/dict from an array,
which is so simple that there should be really a single way to do it, or
very few.
Again, Python has such:
>>> dict([['one',1],['two', 2]])
{'two': 2, 'one': 1}
--
Terry Jan
On 5/23/2011 4:49 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
But let's remember from what this discussion started. This is not a
Python critique, because each language has its own ways.
I just wanted to show that the fact that "there is more than one way to
do it" in Perl and that "there is a single way" in Py
On 5/23/2011 2:55 PM, kracekumar ramaraju wrote:
You can use sizeof function,
Appears not to be in manuals, that I could find. As a special method, it
is intended to be called through sys.getsizeof.
a=12234
b=23456.8
a.__sizeof__()
12
b.__sizeof__()
16
So sizeof int is 12 bytes and float
On 5/24/2011 8:01 AM, markrri...@aol.com wrote:
Hello all. I have Python 2.71 installed on my Windows 7 laptop and it
runs fine. I was having a problem with Python 3.2, 32bit, not starting
with an error message saying this application has quit abnormally.
That was fixed when I took the PYTHONPATH
On 5/24/2011 4:12 PM, markrri...@aol.com wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:50:47 -0400, Terry Reedy
How do you try to start it?
From start|programs|python and clicking on the idle icon.
OK. Works fine for me on winxp desktop and win7 laptop.
3.2.1 will be out soon. Whether or not you find a
On 5/24/2011 4:18 PM, Claudiu Nicolaie CISMARU wrote:
Seems that close_fds did the trick. Anyway, I read that description on
the documentation last night but I think I was so tired that I
understood that in Windows has no effect... :)
Now. There is one more issue. Seems that on faster computers
On 5/25/2011 8:01 AM, John Bokma wrote:
to. Like I already stated before: if Python is really so much better
than Python readability wise, why do I have such a hard time dropping
Perl and moving on?
[you meant 'than Perl'] You are one of the people whose brain fits Perl
(or vice versa) better
On 5/26/2011 3:18 AM, Algis Kabaila wrote:
And why do you insist on calling an instance of list, "list"? Even a
human reader will confuse which is which. What you are showing is an
example how confusing things become when a keyword (list) is
over-written (with list instance).
(Minor note: 'lis
On 5/26/2011 11:36 AM, John Bokma wrote:
Ben Finney writes:
[impolite comment not quoted]
Get a life. Or better, just fuck off and die. It will improve both the
world and the Python community, of which you are nothing but a little,
smelly shitstain.
That abuse is entirely unwelcome in
On 5/26/2011 2:13 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 19:39, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
It would also be great if some of you would upvote it on HackerNews.
Here's a link to the super() how-to-guide and commentary: bit.ly/
iFm8g3
Is that the same link as in the OP? I don't click
On 5/26/2011 11:58 AM, MRAB wrote:
On 26/05/2011 06:17, Chris Rebert wrote:
list.remove(), list.sort(), and list.extend() similarly return None
rather than the now-modified list.
I'd just like to point out that it's a convention, not a rigid rule.
Sometimes it's not followed, for example, dic
On 5/26/2011 7:27 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
I've tried this in 2.5 - 3.2:
--> 'this is a test'.startswith('this')
True
--> 'this is a test'.startswith('this', None, None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
TypeError: slice indices must be integers or None or have an __index__
On 5/28/2011 2:57 PM, Uncle Ben wrote:
Just this past Tuesday, I blindly downloaded 3.1 and found that at the
level I am workloing, all it took to get my 2.7 code to run was to put
parens around the print arguments and double the slashes in integer
division. I didn't even use the 2to3 automation
On 5/29/2011 7:59 AM, Mel wrote:
Henry Olders wrote:
I just spent a considerable amount of time and effort debugging a program.
The made-up code snippet below illustrates the problem I encountered:
def main():
a = ['a list','with','three elements']
print a
print fnc1(a)
print a
def fnc1(b):
r
On 5/29/2011 4:19 PM, Henry Olders wrote:
From my perspective, a function parameter should be considered as
having been assigned (although the exact assignment will not be known
until runtime), and as an assigned variable, it should be considered
local.
That is exactly the case for Python func
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that "5" was the name, but
>>> 5.__add__(6)
File "", line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
Modules, classes, and functions have a .__name__ attribute (I call it
their 'definition name') used to print a representation. As best I can
On 5/30/2011 5:08 AM, Laurent Claessens wrote:
Le 30/05/2011 11:02, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that "5" was the name, but
>>> 5.__add__(6)
File "", line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
What is the ratio
On 5/30/2011 6:15 PM, Irmen de Jong wrote:
Do you mean one of these os's, where Python (2) is not
working properly because the *defaultencoding* is set
to utf-8?
Huh? On all of my machines, including windows and Ubuntu 11.04,
sys.getdefaultencoding()
returns 'ascii'.
For me, WINXP, 2.7
>>>
On 5/30/2011 8:28 PM, Henry Olders wrote:
Sadly, I feel that the main issue that I was trying to address, has
not been dealt with.
False. Please go back and read what I and others wrote before.
...
What I would like is that the variables which are included in the
function definition's param
On 5/30/2011 8:32 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
Ever tried to read Beowulf in the original? Ever tried to write Ænglisc ?
I have, and it is a lot further from modern American than Python 2 and 3
are from each other.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 5/30/2011 8:32 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
However, I guarantee that if I'm dumped unaided in Piccadilly I'll be
able to hail a cab, pay my £12.00 and get myself to Liverpool Street
Station, find the bathroom, and be on the correct train just in time for
dinner, all without looking into the Engli
On 5/31/2011 2:37 AM, Henry Olders wrote:
what I want is a function that is free of side effects back through
the parameters passed in the function call.
You can get that by refraining from mutating parameter objects.
Simple as that.
Just do not expect Python to enforce that discipline on ever
On 5/31/2011 3:17 AM, Henry Olders wrote:
Clearly, making a copy within the function eliminates the possibility of
the side effects caused by passing in mutable objects.
Mutable objects and mutating methods and functions are a *feature* of
Python. If you do not like them, do not use them.
>
On 5/31/2011 2:48 AM, harrismh777 wrote:
fs=[]
Irrelevant here since you immediately rebind 'fs'.
fs = [(lambda n: i + n) for i in range(10)]
[fs[i](1) for i in range(10)]
Same as [f(1) for f in fs]
[10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10] <=== not good
( that was a big surprise! . . . )
On 5/31/2011 4:18 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
You have been hypnotizeed by lambda. (lambda n: i+n) is a *constant
expression*, so you get 10 'equal' functions.
'hypnotized' indeed!
I say 'hypnotized' ;-) because people have posted examples almost
On 5/31/2011 8:09 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
At the moment I'm only speaking about my OP and that particular list
comprehension... the thing that happened (at least for me) is that the
intuitive sense that each 'i' somehow becomes a part of the anonymous
function (I know, not so) is built-in. There
On 6/1/2011 8:40 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
The part that I don't see much about in the docs (some books, that is)
is that the lambda lookups occur late (the lambda is evaluated at the
time it is called). The Python docs on-line *do say* this (I found too
late) but its one quick phrase that can be m
On 6/1/2011 8:44 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
Ian Kelly wrote:
>> ?? wrote
integer. However comparison between a string and an integer seems to
be permitted. Is there any rationale behind this ?
It allows things like sorting of heterogeneous lists. It's generally
viewed as a wart, though, and it
On 9/3/2017 11:17 AM, eryk sun wrote:
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:56 AM, wrote:
What means line below:
File "", line 1
I don't have any file.
Indeed, on Windows you cannot create a file named "". Python
uses this fake name for the code object it compiles when reading from
stdin (i.e. the f
On 9/4/2017 5:50 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
[...]
In IDLE, trackbacks *do* include source lines.
>>> def f():
return 1/0
>>> f()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
f()
File "", line 2, i
On 9/5/2017 10:26 AM, Andrej Viktorovich wrote:
Hello,
I run Python 3.6 console under windows 10. Where is default console directory?
It depends on how and where you start it.
I run script:
tf = open ("aaa.txt", "w")
tf.write(" %s" % 123)
tf.close()
Where file aaa.txt will be created?
On 9/6/2017 12:30 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:17 AM, MRAB wrote:
On 2017-09-06 14:00, Chris Angelico wrote:
I'm not 100% sure, but I think that having two different versions of
CPython X.Y isn't supported on Windows.
I have both 64-bit and 32-bit Python 3.6 installed
On 9/8/2017 6:12 AM, Leam Hall wrote:
I've read comments about Python 3 moving from the Zen of Python.
Comments about Python 3 range from factual to opinionated to fake.
I'm a "plain and simple" person myself.
Many of the changes in Python3 were simplifications -- removing a
semi-deprecat
On 9/8/2017 12:27 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 12:23 am, Leam Hall wrote:
If Python 3 is not a total re-write then why break
compatibility?
To avoid building up excess cruft in the language.
To fix design mistakes which cannot be fixed without a backwards-incompatible
change
On 9/9/2017 6:31 AM, Pavol Lisy wrote:
Interesting reading:
https://stackoverflow.blog/2017/09/06/incredible-growth-python/?cb=1
So much for Python 3 having killed python ;-)
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 9/10/2017 5:05 PM, iurly wrote:
Il giorno domenica 10 settembre 2017 18:53:33 UTC+2, MRAB ha scritto:
I've had a quick look at the source code.
When an object is put into the queue, it's actually put into an internal
buffer (a deque), and then the method returns.
An internal thread works
On 9/11/2017 10:12 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
Thanks for the information. That's more or less the sort of thing I
was thinking of. In fact, from a bit more browsing, I found another
way of approaching the problem - rather than using pygame, it turns
out to be pretty easy to do this in tkinter.
I wa
On 9/11/2017 12:56 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
I'm not looking at actually implementing chess. The idea was prompted
by a programming exercise my son was given, that was about programming
a series of classes modelling robots that know their position on a
grid, and when told to move, can do so accordin
https://spectrum.ieee.org/static/interactive-the-top-programming-languages-2017
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 9/11/2017 10:49 PM, Zubair Shaikh wrote:
What version of Python to install Windows 7 professional 64 bit, intel core i5
Whatever version you want. If you have no idea, goto
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-362/
and click Windows-x86-64 executable installer.
--
Terry Jan R
On 9/13/2017 2:44 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Are there actually Py3 codebases?
Let's think a bit. There is the Python half of the Python3 codebase,
perhaps 400K. But we can discount that.
Then there are all the Py compatible modules on PyPI, which is to say,
most of the major one. How could
On 9/13/2017 3:09 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I tried to write a small (but non-trivial) Tcl app once[1], and would
happily vote to bury Tcl and then might even dance on its grave.
Tkinter, OTOH, is great for small, simple GUI apps -- with a few
caveats:
1. You have to grit your teeth because yo
On 9/13/2017 6:46 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
I presume that "tkinter" is intended to be pronounced
"logically":
T K inter (tee kay inter /ti keI In t%/)
This is how I've always pronounced it.
The toolkit in question is named “tk”, which I have o
On 9/15/2017 3:36 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
Looking through docs, I was unable to tease out whether there's a
prescribed behavior for the results of defining a dictionary with the
same keys multiple times
d = {
"a": 0,
"a": 1,
"a": 2,
}
In my limited testing, it appears t
On 9/16/2017 7:04 PM, breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought some might find this
https://sites.google.com/view/energy-efficiency-languages/ interesting.
By 'energy', they only mean electricity, not food calories. This is the
email I sent to the authors.
---
As a two-decade user of
On 9/17/2017 2:04 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
The numerical extensions have been quasi-official in the sense that at least
3 language enhancements have been make for their use.
I know about the matrix multiplication operator. What are the
On 9/17/2017 4:39 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
My point is
that Python source code was meant to be "executable pseudo
code" (Python devs' words not mine!),
The coinage 'Executable pseudocode' was my description of Python on
comp.lang.python, mirrored to this list, in April 1997, long before
I beca
On 9/18/2017 5:21 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
On Saturday, September 16, 2017 at 11:01:03 PM UTC-7, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 9/16/2017 7:04 PM, b...@g...com wrote:
The particular crippler for CLBG problems is the non-use of numpy in
numerical calculations, such as the n-body problem. Numerical
On 9/20/2017 1:09 PM, Joey Steward wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joey Steward
Date: Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:30 PM
Subject: Issues with python commands in windows powershell
To: python-list@python.org
Hello,
I've been having issues using basic python commands in windows
https://nedbatchelder.com//blog/201709/beginners_and_experts.html
Great post.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 9/23/2017 2:52 PM, Leam Hall wrote:
On 09/23/2017 02:40 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
https://nedbatchelder.com//blog/201709/beginners_and_experts.html
Great post.
Yup. Thanks for the link. I often have that "I bet Fred> doesn't get frustrated." thing going. Nice to know Ned b
On 9/25/2017 12:44 PM, john polo wrote:
Python List,
I am trying to make practice data for plotting purposes. I am using
Python 3.6. The instructions I have are
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import math
import numpy as np
t = np.arange(0, 2.5, 0.1)
y1 = map(math.sin, math.pi*t)
Change to
On 9/28/2017 8:15 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first batch of cut videos for EuroPython
2017.
To see the videos, please head over to our EuroPython YouTube channel
and select the “EuroPython 2017″ playlist:
* EuroPython 2017 Videos *
On 9/28/2017 12:33 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
"""
In the coming weeks, we will release the other videos, in batches of
one conference day per week.
"""
It was not obvious to me that 'private video' meant 'non-existent, not
yet added video'. It usually means a video that is present but not publ
On 9/29/2017 1:25 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
I don't have Python 3.6 installed, can somebody check to see whether or not it
shows the same (wrong) behaviour?
import textwrap
text = ('Lorum ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing'
' elit ZZZ\xa0ZZZ sed do euismod tempor incididunt'
On 9/29/2017 2:35 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:55 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
Expected result:
Lorum ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit
ZZZ ZZZ sed do euismod tempor incididunt ut labore et
dolore magna aliqua.
On Windows 10, I get this on 2.7, 3.5, 3.6
On 10/3/2017 2:02 PM, Breta Skinner wrote:
Hello,
I tried looking around the website, but didn't see a question about
function keys.
Somehow, I "turned off" the F5 function in the IDLE. It no longer "run
module", but just does nothing. I have downloaded the newest version, 3.7,
but that did not s
On 10/3/2017 2:10 PM, Peter Otten wrote:
Stefan Ram wrote:
Is this the best way to write a "loop and a half" in Python?
[snip while loop]
Use iter() and a for loop:
def input_int():
... return int(input("Enter number (0 to terminate): "))
...
for x in iter(input_int, 0):
...
On 10/4/2017 1:24 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2017-10-04, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
It is sometimes called the loop and a half problem. The idea is
that you must attempt to read a line from the file before you know
whether you are at the end of file or not.
Utter nonsense. There's no "must" here.
On 10/6/2017 8:44 AM, ROGER GRAYDON CHRISTMAN wrote:
Despite the documentation, I would still be tempted to say that range is a
function.
It is, *according* to the documentation. Built-in classes are included
in Library Reference, Ch. 2, Built-in Functions. Changing that to
"Built-in Funct
On 10/6/2017 1:32 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2017-10-06, Thomas Jollans wrote:
Seriously? sys.stdin can be None? That's terrifying.
Why?
Unix daemons usually run with no stdin, stderr, or stdout.
And yes, people do write Unix daemons
On 10/6/2017 8:19 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 05:33 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2017-10-06, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
The reason a daemon usually opens dummy file descriptors for the 0, 1
and 2 slots is to avoid accidents. Some library might assume the
existence of those file de
On 10/7/2017 5:09 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:44 pm, ROGER GRAYDON CHRISTMAN wrote:
Despite the documentation, I would still be tempted to say that range is a
function.
Taking duck-typing to the meta-level, every time I use range, I use its name
followed
by a pair of parenth
On 10/7/2017 10:45 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2017-10-07, bartc wrote:
Interactive Python requires quit() or exit(), complete with parentheses.
Nonsense. On Unix you can just press ctrl-D (or whatever you have
configured as eof) at the command prompt. On windows, it's Ctrl-Z
.
IDLE's she
On 10/8/2017 5:24 AM, Joe Wilde wrote:
I am having trouble getting IDLE (Python 3.6 - 64-bit) to open for Windows 10.
When I try and run IDLE, nothing happens. It works fine for Python 2.7, but
won't open for Python 3.6.
Give more information. How did you install Python? Did you select the
On 10/9/2017 12:22 PM, John Black wrote:
I want sep="" to be the default without having to specify it every time I
call print. Is that possible?
John Black
Define a replacement print function that makes this the default.
Something like (untested, a detail may be wrong):
_print = print
def
On 10/10/2017 10:37 AM, xieyuheng wrote:
2. what kind of functions does not have signature,
so that 'inspect.signature(f)' can be used for them ?
When .signature was added, it may not have been usable with *any*
C-coded function. About the same, a mechanism was added to make
signatures
On 10/11/2017 11:54 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 10/11/2017 08:46 AM, Michael Cuddehe wrote:
- What exactly did you install?
Latest install: Python 3.5.4 (v3.5.4:3f56838, Aug 8 2017, 02:17:05) [MSC
v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
^^^
This is exactly what I see
On 10/11/2017 10:46 AM, Michael Cuddehe wrote:
- What exactly did you install?
Latest install: Python 3.5.4 (v3.5.4:3f56838, Aug 8 2017, 02:17:05) [MSC
v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Downloaded from python.org.
- Can you start the Python interpreter?
Yes...works fine.
* How exactly
On 10/15/2017 10:50 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
Gents,
how do i get this group in a newsreader?
Point your newsreader to news.gmane.org, group
gmane.comp.python.general, which mirrors python-list, among hundreds or
thousands of other lists. If you check the headers of this message, you
should see
On 10/17/2017 1:07 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
The point is, if del were a function, then calling del(x) would pass the
*value* of x into the function, not the name 'x'
So we would have to quote either the entire rest of the statement, or
each item separately,
-- unless the interpreter
On 10/17/2017 10:52 AM, Jason wrote:
I've got problem that I thought would scale well across cores.
What OS?
def f(t):
return t[0]-d[ t[1] ]
d= {k: np.array(k) for k in entries_16k }
e = np.array()
pool.map(f, [(e, k) for k in d]
*Every* multiprocessing example in the doc intentiona
On 10/18/2017 2:09 AM, Christopher Reimer wrote:
Greetings,
I'm setting up different test environments for tox. I can't find Windows
installer for the latest version of Python 3.4 on the download page.
Versions 3.4.5 to 3.4.7 only have the source files available.
Correct. These are security
On 10/19/2017 5:07 AM, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
I got some info below each time when I squeeze the table:
.
.5006
.5006.50712528
.5006.50712496
.5006.50712464
.5006.50712144
.5006.50712528.50712560.50782256
.5006.50712528.50712560.50782256.50783024
.5006.5071252
On 10/19/2017 11:28 PM, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
Terry Reedy於 2017年10月20日星期五 UTC+8上午7時37分59秒寫道：
On 10/19/2017 5:07 AM, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
I got some info below each time when I squeeze the table:
.
.5006
.5006.50712528
.5006.50712496
.5006.50712464
.5006.50712144
On 10/21/2017 1:25 PM, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
Terry Reedy at 2017-10-20 UTC+8 AM 7:37:59 wrote:
On 10/19/2017 5:07 AM, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
I got some info below each time when I squeeze the table:
.
.5006
.5006.50712528
.5006.50712496
.5006.50712464
On 10/23/2017 10:23 AM, Daniel Tangemann wrote:
I've recently downloaded and installed python 3.6. (I had already also 2.7 and 3.2 on my computer)
Initially pip was looking in the wrong directory to install to, so I changed that. then it had
trouble installing matplotlib, so I decided to get ri
On 10/25/2017 12:12 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
On 2017-10-25 15:57, Rustom Mody wrote:
pdb inside emacs works (to a fashion)
And it shows the arrow for current line so its at least quasi-gui
I believe idle too is much more usable than a few years earlier
I haven't used IDLE in years (if ever)
path-to-binary -m pip
Your path-to-binary appears to be
C:\Users\Daniel86\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36\python.exe
You should be able to replace that with
py -3.6
but try
py -3.6 -c "import sys; sys.executable"
to be sure.
Terry Reedy hat am 24. Oktober 2017 um 08:3
On 11/1/2017 5:12 PM, Alexey Muranov wrote:
what do you think about the idea of replacing "`else`" with "`then`" in
the contexts of `for` and `try`?
This idea has been argued to death more than once before. I am opposed
on both logical and practical grounds, but will not repeat myself for
t
On 11/2/2017 6:10 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
Occasionally it is useful to loop over a bunch of stuff in the interactive
interpreter, printing them as you go on a single line:
for x in something():
print(x, end='')
If you do that, the prompt overwrites your output, and you get a mess:
py>
On 11/2/2017 9:18 AM, ROGER GRAYDON CHRISTMAN wrote:
I have a partial answer to my own question:
This seems to work for me:
---
link = urllib.request.urlopen(urlpath)
data = link.read().decode('utf-8').split('\n')
reader = csv.DictReader(data)
for row in reader:
---
I think here my concern is
On 11/2/2017 8:53 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:20 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
This seems like a bug in how Python interacts with your console. On
Windows, in Python started from an icon or in Command Prompt:
>>> for c in 'abc': print(c, end='
On 11/3/2017 5:24 AM, Ali Rıza KELEŞ wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday, while working with redis, i encountered a strange case.
I want to ask why is the following `True`
```
"s" is b"s".decode()
```
while the followings are `False`?
```
"so" is b"so".decode()
"som" is b"som".decode()
"some" is b"some".de
On 11/4/2017 3:42 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
What is better:
...
import math
...
... math.cos ...
...
or
...
from math import cos
...
... cos ...
...
?
(To me, the first is more readable, because at the site
where »math.cos« is used, it is made clear that »cos«
comes from math.
On 11/5/2017 4:14 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 05Nov2017 13:09, Στέφανος Σωφρονίου
wrote:
Folks,
More and more nonsense are coming in and I find it really difficult to
follow any new post that may come and I have to either search for
specific content or scroll down until I hit it by accident
On 11/11/2017 9:06 PM, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
Ned Batchelder於 2017年11月11日星期六 UTC+8下午8時49分27秒寫道：
This looks like fairly advanced code. It will be difficult to port to
Python 3 *without* understanding some of the old history. There seem to
be forks on GitHub, including one with a pull reques
On 11/15/2017 6:58 AM, breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at 8:53:44 AM UTC, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, to have to say it.
Have a nice day.
Do you mean it segfaults or simply provides a traceback? If the latter is your
environment set correctly?
Why bother?
On 11/16/2017 5:51 AM, breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 8:43:24 AM UTC, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark: Jmf's troll posts to the Google group are not propagated to
python-list and the gmane mirror except when people, like you here,
quote him. Please stop.
Do you
On 11/16/2017 4:55 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 11/15/2017 11:16 PM, Saeed Baig wrote:
- Do you guys think it would be a good idea? Why or why not? Do you
think there’s a better way to do it? I’d like to know what others
think about this idea before making any formal submission.
Except for for
On 11/24/2017 10:33 AM, namenobodywa...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
i've just finished my first excursion into artificial intelligence with a game
less trivial than tictactoe, and here it is in case anybody can offer
criticism/suggestions/etc
Since you did not start with tests or write tests as
1101 - 1200 of 7511 matches
Mail list logo
