On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 10:25, Julieta Shem via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Alan Bawden writes:
> >
> > def powers_of_2_in(n):
> > bc = (n ^ (n - 1)).bit_count() - 1
> > return bc, n >> bc
>
> That's pretty fancy and likely the fastest.
It might be the fastest but it depends how big you expect
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 13:04, Left Right via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Wow. That place turned out to be the toxic pit I didn't expect.
>
> It's a shame that a public discussion of public goods was entrusted to
> a bunch of gatekeepers with no sense of responsibility for the thing
> they keep the keys
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 22:38, Left Right via Python-list
wrote:
>
> > Then your understanding is flat-out wrong. Encouraging participation
> > by everyone DOES mean deleting what is unproductive, offensive, and
> > likely to discourage participation.
>
> I haven't written anything unproductive or
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 at 00:35, Left Right wrote:
>
> It's not for you to choose the way I communicate. There are accepted
> boundaries, and I'm well within those boundaries. Anything beyond that
> is not something I'm even interested in hearing your opinion on.
You might not be interested in my op
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 22:38, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
>
> The discussion though was about a specific OP asking if they can fix their
> problem. One solution being suggested is to fix a deeper problem and simply
> make their code work with a recent version of python 3.
The OP has not repl
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 23:11, Chris Angelico via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 07:57, Oscar Benjamin via Python-list
> wrote:
> > They are seeing a warning that explicitly says "You can upgrade to a
> > newer version of Python to solve this"
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 23:52, Greg Ewing via Python-list
wrote:
> On 13/06/24 10:09 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > So if anyone
> > actually does need to use pip with Python 2.7, they probably need to
> > set up a local server
>
> You should also be able to download a .tar.gz from PyPI and use p
On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 at 11:55, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Consider this scenario (which I ran into in real life):
> I want to open a text file and do a lot of processing on the lines
> of that file.
> If the file does not exist I want to take appropriate action, e.g.
> print an
(posting on-list this time)
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 15:18, Popov, Dmitry Yu via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs.
>
> Does NumPy provide a simple mechanism to identify relatively prime integers,
> i.e. integers which don't have a common factor other than +1 or -1? For
> example, in case of this
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 19:02, Mark Bourne via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Martin Ruppert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the division 0.4/7 provides a wrong result. It should give a periodic
> > decimal fraction with at most six digits, but it doesn't.
> >
> > Below is the comparison of the result of decimal, m
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 at 19:17, Gilmeh Serda via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Was just playing with numbers and stumbled on something I've never seen
> before.
...
>
> >>> 9**9**4
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> ValueError: Exceeds the limit (4300 digits) for integer string
11 matches
Mail list logo
