On Dec 9, 11:58 am, Valery wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Q: how to organize parallel accesses to a huge common read-only Python
> data structure?
>
> Details:
>
> I have a huge data structure that takes >50% of RAM.
> My goal is to have many computational threads (or processes) that can
> have an efficient
On Dec 11, 11:00 am, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I was going to suggest memcached but it probably serializes non-atomic
> types.
Atomic as well.
memcached communicates through sockets[3] (albeit possibly unix
sockets, which are faster than TCP ones).
multiprocessing has shared memory schemes, but doe
On Dec 31 2009, 6:36 pm, garyrob wrote:
> One thing I'm not clear on regarding Klauss' patch. He says it's
> applicable where the data is primarily non-numeric. In trying to
> understand why that would be the case, I'm thinking that the increased
> per-obje
