On Jun 3, 2:17 pm, 7stud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 2, 10:31 pm, lialie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > suppose i have a free_object list[Sample1, Smaple2]. when create a
> > new object sample(*args, **kwds), if free_object_list isn't empty, just
> > pop one from free_ob
On 3月27日, 下午7时22分, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lialie wrote:
>
> [... snip slightly confused indication that reading back a
> binary item using GetChunk appears to double its length ...]
>
> Well I don't know why this should be happening, but I do at
> least have a few suggestions:
>
>
Hi,
I create a thread in a non gui thread, and it does well. But it seems
strange. Somebody told me better not for it may cause something hard to
imagine.
Is there any different between them?
THX
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I haven't try the files yet. But have got a similar problem before. The
situation is nearly the same.
Always at random time , it reported that the memory read or write
violently.But I use Windows 2000(Python 2.3, wxPython 2.4). Windows
issue says 2000 doesn't support HP, so I simply turn it off. I
Hi, all
I am writing a C extension with .Net.
Now I have a list of points, like [(0.0, 0.0), (2.0, 3.0), (random x,
random y)].
Is there a better way to translate it to an array than doing it one by one?
Thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list