In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Christian Dieterich wrote:
> > On Dé Céadaoin, Feabh 2, 2005, at 17:48 America/Chicago,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Hi there
> >>
> >> I started a very long and roundabout process of attempting to install
> >> py
I have a problem that I run into a lot with the 'legend' command's
default behavior. I've found a work-around but I wonder if there's a
better way.
For a simple example, take the following:
x= [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]
a= [5,3,2,4,6,5,8,7]
b= [4,1,3,
Could anyone tell me the efficient way to do this? Extracting values
from an array for a single condition (say all values greater than 'x')
using 'where' and 'compress' is simple enough.
>>> from Numeric import arange,where,compress
>>> data= arange(10)
>>> data= [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Right. "3 < data" creates an array of 0s and 1s where the condition is
> false and true, respectively. You don't need where() at all.
>
> Try
>
> mask = logical_and(3 < data, data <= 7)
Great. That's exactly what I n
I've only been able to plot data with both symbols and lines by
issuing two plot commands, one for markers and one for lines. That's
perfectly fine, but it creates a problem when I try to create a legend
for it. For some reason, the legend command by default alternates
between using symbo
If you simply want the latest python to run from the command line, then
compiling the source code works fine on the mac. I just installed
2.4.1 on Os 10.3.8 last week without any problems.
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.4.1/Python-2.4.1.tgz
"./configure"
"make"
"make install"
J.S.
--
http