Hello
I was wondering if some Python module were available to identify a
user through their browser, like it's done on the Panopticlick site:
http://panopticlick.eff.org/
I'd like to ban abusive users, and it seems like a good solution,
since few users will think of installing a different browse
Hello
Every once in a while, my ISP's SMTP server refuses to send
perfectly legit e-mails because it considers them as SPAM.
So I'd like to install a dead-simple SMTP server on my XP computer
just to act as SMTP backup server.
All I'd need is to change the SMTP address in my e-mail client
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:48:29 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>Rather than write something from scratch, I'd look at deploying
>something out-of-the-box - Postfix, for instance - which you will be
>able to configure much faster than writing your own. And then you
>could have it either send via your IS
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 11:46:52 -0600, Michael Torrie
wrote:
>What you're looking for is not an SMTP server but a Mail Transfer Agent,
>called an MTA.
>
>Pretty much all distros ship with an MTA by default, even if the SMTP
>server part of it isn't installed or running. And often the MTA is, for
>com
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:28:27 -0600, Michael Torrie
wrote:
>The Sendmail MTA has been ported to many platforms including windows.
>But...
Thanks for the tip. Since I couldn't find a good, basic, native
Windows app, I was indeed about to look at eg. Exim + Cygwin, and
resort to a Linux appliance if
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 21:01:09 + (UTC), Grant Edwards
wrote:
>Unless you've got a static IP address, a domain name, and a valid MX
>record that will match up when they do a reverse DNS lookup, it's
>pretty unlikely that you're going to have much luck running an SMTP
>server. Most other SMTP se
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 21:01:09 + (UTC), Grant Edwards
wrote:
>Unless you've got a static IP address, a domain name, and a valid MX
>record that will match up when they do a reverse DNS lookup, it's
>pretty unlikely that you're going to have much luck running an SMTP
>server. Most other SMTP ser
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:29:42 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>One thing to check when you change how you send mail is your SPF
>record. I run the mail server for kepl.com.au and have set its SPF to:
>
>"v=spf1 ip4:122.107.147.136 ip4:203.214.67.43 ip4:192.168.0.0/16 -all"
>
>If your SPF is as strict
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:54:11 -0400, "Eric S. Johansson"
wrote:
>try http://emailrelay.sourceforge.net/
Thanks. I did find it, but it says it's not a full MTA:
"E-MailRelay is not a routing MTA. It forwards e-mail to a
pre-configured SMTP server, regardless of any message addressing or
DNS redire
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:10:10 -0600, Michael Torrie
wrote:
>Where did you look? Here's one I found. It's not the real sendmail
>program, but it implements the interface which is all you need:
>
>http://glob.com.au/sendmail/
>
>I just googled for sendmail win32
Thanks, but I need an MTA, not just
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:14:15 -0400, Kevin Walzer
wrote:
>http://www.hmailserver.com
Thanks. hMailServer was one of the apps I checked, and I was just
making sure there weren't something simpler, considering my needs,
ideally something like Mongoose MTA.
Regardless, because of the SPAM anti-measu
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:39:50 +0200, Gilles wrote:
>I'm an amateur programmer, and would like to know what the main
>options are to build web applications in Python instead of PHP.
When I need to host my Python application (preferably in Europe since
my users will be located there), w
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:44:08 -0700, Paul Rubin
wrote:
>There are both kinds. The first kind is called a Virtual Private Server
>(VPS). The second kind is called shared hosting.
Thanks much for the infos.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello
Someone I know with no computer knowledge has a studio appartment to
rent in Paris and spent four months building a small site in Joomla to
find short-time renters.
The site is just...
- a few web pages that include text (in four languages) and pictures
displayed in a Flash slide show
- a c
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:28:09 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
>You probably want to look at https://www.django-cms.org/. It's not
>something that a person with "no computer knowledge" could set up, but
>once it's set up, that person could use it to build pages.
>
>But, to be honest, for somebody who rea
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:21:42 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
>This is really getting quite far afield for a Python group. There are
>better forums for these kinds of questions.
Probably. I'll keep that in mind while checking Python web frameworks.
Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyt
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:09:40 -0700 (PDT), alex23
wrote:
>Not necessarily! There are several static site generators written in
>Python :)
>
>One that I see being updating a lot is Nikola: http://nikola.ralsina.com.ar/
I'll check it out, thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:27:40 +0200, Dieter Maurer
wrote:
>There is also "Plone" ("http://plone.org";) -- easy to set up.
>
>You likely need third party extensions for the "anti-SPAM" support
>and the onlie payment.
I'll see what extensions it offers. Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
Hello
I use A Small Orange (ASO) as my web provider. Asking the question in
their forum so far didn't work, so I figured I might have a faster
answer by asking here.
Support replied this in an old thread: "Just a CGI option. We don't
have enough users to justify adding mod_python support."
http:/
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:56:26 +0200, Dieter Maurer
wrote:
>You should probably read the mentioned forum resources to learn
>details about the Python support provided by your web site hoster.
Yup, but so far, no answer, so I figured someone here might now.
Those articles seem to indicate that CGI
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:26:19 +0100, Tim Golden
wrote:
>Just to make a point: one person's "isn't a good solution" is another
>person's "works perfectly well for me". Modern servers are really quite
>quick: the cost of starting up a Python process and generating an HTML
>page can be really quite
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 02:03:33 +0200, Gilles wrote:
>Does it mean that ASO only supports writing Python web apps as
>long-running processes (CGI, FCGI, WSGI, SCGI) instead of embedded
>Python à la PHP?
I need to get the big picture about the different solutions to run a
Python web ap
Hello
I'm learning how to call Python scripts through the different
solutions available.
For some reason, this CGI script that I found on Google displays the
contents of the variable but the HTML surrounding it is displayed
as-is by the browser instead of being rendered:
--
#
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:44:37 +0100, Robert Kern
wrote:
>> For some reason, this CGI script that I found on Google displays the
>> contents of the variable but the HTML surrounding it is displayed
>> as-is by the browser instead of being rendered
Thanks all. I (obviously) combined two scripts but
Hello
Apache fails running this basic CGI script that I found on the Net:
www.acme.com/cgi-bin/test.py?name=myname
===
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Import modules for CGI handling
import cgi, cgitb
cgitb.enable()
# Create instance of FieldStorage
form = cgi.FieldStorage()
# Get data from f
Found it: The script MUST return something to the browser. I was
missing this:
print "Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8"
print
# print a document
print "Name is %s" % ( cgi.escape(name), )
Sorry about that.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:59:39 -0400, Rod Person
wrote:
>Check the Apache error log, there should be more information there.
It's a shared account, so I only have access to what's in cPanel,
which didn't display anything. Problem solved.
Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:56:14 +0200, Hans Mulder
wrote:
>Most such panels have a button to show the error log for your own site.
>
>If you can't find it, ask the help desk of the web hosting company.
>
>If there really is no way for you to see the error log, ask the help
>desk to mail you the error
Hello
This is a newbie question.
I need to read a text file into a variable, loop through each line and
use a regex to substitute some items within the line, and save the
whole variable into a new text file.
This triggers an error when I save the modified variable that contains
all the lines:
==
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:19:02 +0200, Gilles wrote:
(snip)
Found it:
#rewrite lines to new file
output = open('output.txt','w')
for line in textlines:
#edit each line
line = "just a test"
output.write("%s" % line)
output.cl
Hello
To write a long-running web application, I'd like to some feedback
about which option to choose.
Apparently, the choice boilds down to this:
- FastCGI
- SCGI
- WSGI
It seems like FCGI and SCGI are language-neutral, while WSGI is
Python-specific.
Besides that, how to make an informed choic
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 14:04:29 -0400, Terry Reedy
wrote:
>If you process each line separately, there is no reason to read them all
>at once. Use the file as an iterator directly. Since line is already a
>string, there is no reason to copy it into a new string. Combining these
>two changes with Ma
Hello
The shared host I intend to use to run a small Python web app only
supports mod_fcgid on its Apache server.
If I understood what I read on the Net, the ideal solution would be to
have mod_wsgi installed and have it run either as a module within
Apache or a stand-alone process to tal
Hello
I've seen both shebang lines to run a Python script on a *nix host:
#!/usr/bin/env python
#!/usr/bin/python
What's the difference?
Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:57:28 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
>The first one looks through your PATH to find the right python
>interpreter to run. The second one is hard-wired to run /usr/bin/python.
>
>If you only have a single copy of python installed, it doesn't really
>matter which you use. But, yo
Hello
I'm trying to run my very first FastCGI script on an Apache shared
host that relies on mod_fcgid:
==
#!/usr/bin/python
from fcgi import WSGIServer
import cgitb
# enable debugging
cgitb.enable()
def myapp(environ, start_response):
start_response('200 OK', [('Content-Type
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:37:36 +0200, Gilles wrote:
>==
>Internal Server Error
>
>The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was
>unable to complete your request.
>==
Looks like fcgi.py doesn't support WSGI:
Traceback (most
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:16:22 +0200, "Michael Ross"
wrote:
>Do it the other way around:
>
># cgitb before anything else
>import cgitb
>cgitb.enable()
>
># so this error will be caught
> from fcgi import WSGIServer
Thanks much for the tip. The error isn't displayed when calling the
script from a we
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:19:54 -0400, D'Arcy Cain
wrote:
>Not just flexible but portable. On various systems I have Python
>in /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin and /usr/pkg/bin. "#!/usr/bin/env python"
>finds it in each case so I only need one version of the script.
Good to know.
--
http://mail.python.o
Hello
Does someone know if something must be done after editing a FastCGI +
WSGI script so that the changes will show in the browser immediately
instead of having to wait X minutes?
===
#!/usr/bin/env python2.6
def myapp(environ, start_response):
start_response('200 OK', [('Conte
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:57:14 +0200, Gilles wrote:
>I guess the FastCGI server (Flup) only updates its cache every so
>often. Do I need to type a command to force Flup to recompile the
>Python script?
Turns out that, yes, mod_fcgid is configured to reload a script only
after some tim
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:05:25 -0700 (PDT), Ramchandra Apte
wrote:
>> Definitely not plug 'n play :-/
>
>Well the plug and play standard is superseded by USB practically.
Indeed ;-)
Anyway, Support finally got back to me, and it turns out that they
have Flup alreay installed on shared hosts, so I
Hello
I'd like to use the Mongoose basic web server with Python which can
call scripts through CGI.
I have a coupole of questions:
1. Mongoose must be told in the shebang file where to locate the
interpreter, but ActivePython 2.5.1 comes with fours files that look
like the interpreter (actually,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:09:55 +1100, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>The ones with the -w tag are designed for Windows apps that are going
>to bring up a GUI and don't want a console. The python[w]25.exe ones
>will be in case you have multiple Pythons installed and want to
>explicitly call for version 2.5.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:05:48 -0700 (PDT), chip9m...@gmail.com wrote:
>these scripts will do a lot of calculation on a big dataset, and it is
>possible that there will be many requests in a short period of time.
In that case, are you sure a web script is a good idea? If you're
thinking web to make
Hello
I'd like to check something about running Python web applications.
Generally speaking, the reason scripts run faster when called through
FastCGI or the mod_* modules, is because the interpreter is already up
and running.
But when running PHP scripts, this does nothing about fetching the
fil
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:03:14 +0100, Tim Golden
wrote:
>(Your question is a little confused at the end. I'm choosing to
>understand: why can't we just run Python one-shot, like CGI? The likely
>alternative meaning is: why can't the incoming request be routed to an
>already-running Python program --
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:53:11 -0400, David Hutto
wrote:
>>> OTOH, Python web scripts can be written as long-running scripts: In
>>> this case, what is the added-value of using FastCGI? Why can't the
>>> web server simply call the Python script directly, just like CGI?
>
>The server should call a th
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:24:16 +0100, Tim Golden
wrote:
>> But actually, I didn't mean one-shot scripts, where the Python
>> interpreter + script must be loaded each time, but rather: If I leave
>> a Python running in an endless loop, why not just use either CGI or
>> some other basic way to call th
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:00:17 +0100, Tim Golden
wrote:
>Certainly there are Python equivalents (mod_python, mod_wsgi, etc.)
>which can run in effectively the same way as mod_php, and they could be
>configured to run an fcgi frontend script, I presume. There's always a
>certain confusion here becaus
Hello
I'm an amateur programmer, and would like to know what the main
options are to build web applications in Python instead of PHP.
I notice that Python-based solutions are usually built as long-running
processes with their own web server (or can run in the back with eg.
Nginx and be reached th
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:12:55 +0200, Alain Ketterlin
wrote:
>You misunderstand the problem here. It's not about the duration of the
>actions, it's about the latency it takes to read/parse/execute the
>script. HTTP is stateless anyway, so if the same "interpreter" handles
>several requests, what you
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:42:56 -0400, D'Arcy Cain
wrote:
>I guess I am in the minority then. I do plan to turn one of my larger
>projects into a standalone web server some day but so far writing
>simple Python CGI scripts has served me fine. I even do some embedding
>by using server side scripting
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:01:10 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>Apache's mod_php partially evens out the difference, but not
>completely, and of course, it's perfectly possible to write a dispatch
>loop in PHP, as Octavian said.
It looks like mod_php and equivalents for web servers other than
Apache a
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:18:21 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>Think of it as Apache + PHP versus Python. Apache keeps running, it's
>only your PHP script that starts and stops. With a long-running
>process, you keep everything all in together, which IMHO is simpler
>and better.
Why is a long-running
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:28:22 +0300, "Octavian Rasnita"
wrote:
>Otherwise... if you want you can also create a web app using PHP and
>CodeIgniter web framework and run it with fastcgi...
Thanks for the infos.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:19:29 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>It's far simpler to manage, it retains running state, and is easily
>enough encapsulated. It's the non-magic way of doing things. Also, it
>plays very nicely with the MUD style of process, which is something I
>do a lot with Pike. Plus, if
On 13 Jun 2012 08:29:05 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/
>
>and especially lack PHP's security vulnerabilities.
Thanks for the link.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:48:27 +0200, Matej Cepl
wrote:
>I don't think it is a proper description of the situation (please,
>somebody correct my mistakes, I am not 100% sure about it myself). WSGI
>applications (which is basically all web applications in Python) could
>run in the hosted servers (
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:41:41 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>For high-availability servers, I can't speak for Python, as I've never
>done that there; but it seems likely that there's good facilities. My
>personal preference is Pike, but that's off-topic for this list. :)
>But the simple answer for s
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:00:59 +1000, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>Most high level languages probably have some sort of HTTP server
>available. Some make it trivially easy to plug some code in and start
>serving. Python is advertised as "batteries included", and one of its
>packets of batteries is a fairl
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:01:23 +, "Prasad, Ramit"
wrote:
>Maybe this article will help you
>http://www.infoworld.com/d/application-development/pillars-python-six-python-web-frameworks-compared-169442
>The comments on /. should round out anything missing from the article (I hope)
>http://develop
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:27:21 +0200, Christian Heimes
wrote:
>A long running process has lots of benefits that makes design and
>development easier and makes your app faster.
Thanks much for the infos. Makes you wonder why commercial companies
still choose PHP to write their web site.
--
http://m
On 13 Jun 2012 22:16:51 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>Surely the obvious answer is that a framework offers the benefit that you
>don't have to write the application from scratch.
Yes, but between receiving the query and sending the response, what
features do frameworks offer that I'd have to writ
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:16:31 +0200, Christian Heimes
wrote:
>PHP was developed for non-developers. (see
>http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/ ).
>It's much easier and also cheaper to find bad coders and non-developers
>than code people. The outcome is bad performance a
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:12:37 +, "Prasad, Ramit"
wrote:
>You are not Facebook (at least yet).
Indeed, but with so much criticism about PHP, it's odd that they would
still choose it.
Anyway, thanks much for the infos. I'll look at the web frameworks and
how to connect the Python app to a front
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:03:29 -0500, Tim Chase
wrote:
>That's just my off-the-top-of-my-head list of things that you'd have
>to come up with that Django happens to give you out-of-the-box.
Thanks much. So the next step will have to find a framework that's
right for a given application.
--
http://
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:38:52 -0400, Kevin Walzer
wrote:
>> Thanks. hMailServer was one of the apps I checked, and I was just
>> making sure there weren't something simpler, considering my needs,
>> ideally something like Mongoose MTA.
>>
>> Regardless, because of the SPAM anti-measures mentioned a
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:08:54 +0200, Gilles wrote:
>I was wondering if some Python module were available to identify a
>user through their browser, like it's done on the Panopticlick site:
>
>http://panopticlick.eff.org/
It appears that flash cookies is a better solution to keep
Hello
I need to write a small GUI application that should run on Windows and
Mac.
What open-source framework would you recommend? I just need basic
widgets (button, listbox, etc.) and would rather a solution that can
get me up and running fast.
I know about wxWidgets and Qt: Are there other good
On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 06:47:07 -0500 (CDT), Wayne Werner
wrote:
>Have you checked Kenneth Rietz's inbox.py[1]? It's fairly simple to
>use/extend and might fit your modest needs.
>
>
>-W
>
>[1]:https://crate.io/packages/inbox/
Thanks. I'll check it out.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 21:41:16 -0400, Kevin Walzer
wrote:
>For what it's worth, that hasn't been my experience.
Thanks for the feedback. I'll experiment and see how it goes.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 10:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Aseem Bansal
wrote:
>I found Python3's sqlite3 library. I found that I needed sql commands for
>using it.
>
>I have tried sql.learncodethehardway but it isn't complete yet. I tired
>looking on stackoverflow's sql tag also but nothing much there.
It'll b
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 13:22:01 +0200, Vlastimil Brom
wrote:
>I mostly use wxPython myself, but if you just need some basic widgets
>and not some very complex or non-standard layouts, the tkinter -
>available in the standard library - might be perfectly viable.
>http://docs.python.org/3.3/library/tk.h
Hello,
I already posted in their forum, but got no reply and figured some
people here might have experienced this too.
I'm currently running ActivePython 2.5.1.1 on my XP Pro host.
After downloading and running the installer to 2.7.2.5, I get the
following error message:
"Windows Installer: The
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:47:21 -0700 (PDT), sagar varule
wrote:
>Pyside is also Good. It has a Designer which can be helpful.
Thanks for the info.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello
I upgraded to ActivePython 2.7.2.5, and would like to get started
learning about Qt and wxWidgets in Python.
I have a couple of question:
1. Are there obvious reasons to choose either QT/PyQt or
wxWidgets/wxPython? I have the impression that Qt is a richer GUI than
wxWidgets, but it could
Hello
I have a couple of newbie questions about using Python in a FastCGI
+ Flup context on a shared CentOS server:
1. The following script runs fine...
=
#!/usr/bin/env python2.6
def myapp(environ, start_response):
start_response('200 OK', [('Content-Type
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:30:01 +0100, Gilles wrote:
> I have a couple of newbie questions about using Python in a FastCGI
>+ Flup context on a shared CentOS server:
Please ignore the thread. I found the error, and a way to catch
compile-time errors (log on through SSH, and run &
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:30:12 +1100, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>That'll catch some forms of error, but not everything. You may also
>want to consider looking for your server's error log - that may be
>getting the actual traceback. I don't know what your server setup is,
>but there's likely to be one so
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:30:45 +1100, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>Try running python2.6 -V
>
>Your shebang line says that it's looking for a program named
>"python2.6", which is quite probably not the same as the one named
>just "python".
Indeed, they have two versions of Python installed:
# python2.6
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:42:50 +1100, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>It's entirely possible you have a third Python, a 3.x, as well.
>Different Pythons coexist quite happily on a system.
Thank for the help. I'm on my way to figure out how mod_fcgid, Flup,
and Python scripts work together.
--
http://mail.p
Hello
Before I go ahead, I'd like to make sure I'm doing it the right away:
1. yum install httpd mod_wsgi
2. Edit /etc/sysconfig/httpd to uncomment this line to get Apache to
run as worker MPM:
"#HTTPD=/usr/sbin/httpd.worker"
3. Edit mod_wsgi
4. Build a test WSGI Python script
5. Start Apache
Hello
I'm following this tutorial to learn about writing Python apps in
WSGI:
http://webpython.codepoint.net/wsgi_tutorial
On a Linux host with Python 2.6.6 installed, I launched the
"Environment dictionary" sample, but can't connect to it from my
remote Windows host since the application only a
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:50:36 +1100, Chris Angelico
wrote:
>According to the docstring, the first argument to make_server() is the
>host name to bind to. Using "localhost" means you're bound to
>127.0.0.1, as you see. Use your LAN IP address there, or "" to bind to
>all local addresses - or possibl
Hello
After going through multiple articles about the advantage of using
WSGI instead of FastCGI + Flup to run Python web apps, I have a couple
of questions:
1. Which server + WSGI module would you recommend? I know about Apache
and Graham Dumpleton's mod_wsgi, but what about Lighttpd and
Hello
I tried running uWSGI on an ARM-based appliance, but it fails.
Apparently, it could be due to the official Python 2.6.6 interpreter
in the depot not being compiled the way uWSGI expects it to be:
./configure --enable-shared; make; make install;
www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:22:55 +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:
>In any case, cross compiling Python shouldn't be that hard. I
>just recently built 2.7.3 for my OpenWRT router since the packaged
>Python didn't have readline support (some long standing linking issue
>with readline and ncurses and uClibc).
that yields the file names of a directory and
does not make a giant list of what's in.
i.e :
for filename in enumerate_files(some_directory):
# My cooking...
Many thanks by advance.
--
Gilles Lenfant
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Le lundi 17 décembre 2012 16:52:19 UTC+1, Oscar Benjamin a écrit :
> On 17 December 2012 15:28, Gilles Lenfant <...> wrote:
>
>
> In the last couple of months there has been a lot of discussion (on
>
> python-list or python-dev - not sure) about creating a library
Hello,
Before I go ahead and learn how to write this, I was wondering if
someone knew of some source code I could use to download and rename a
bunch of files, ie. the equivalent of wget's -O switch?
I would provide a two-column list where column 1 would contain the
full URL, and column 2
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:14:27 +0200, Laurent Claessens
wrote:
>The following puts in the string `a` the code of the page urlBase :
>
>a = urllib.urlopen(urlBase).read()
>
>Then you have to write `a` in a file.
>
>There could be better way.
Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyt
Does someone has installed wxPython on the Cygwin platform, environment ?
Thank you
Gilles DRIDI
http://cdridi.club.fr
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
I've got a nasty bug and no idea to deal with :
here is the method :
def denormer(self, var) :
" denorme un vecteur d'entree "
try:
#a = map(self.decerner, self.param, var)
#a = [self.decerner(x, y) for x, y in map(None,
self.param, var)]
object" is now a reserved (builtin) name, use "objekt" instead.
class Foo(object):
pass
objekt = Foo()
attrName = sys.argv[1]
values = ['foo', 'bar', 'whatever']
setattr(objekt, attrName, values)
HTH
--
Gilles
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
Have you guys any good experience on connecting a Python (Zope) app
running on Linux to a Windoze SQL*Server ?
Many thanks by advance to report your success, failure, pitfalls (...)
and used products.
Even reports using commercial solutions are welcome.
--
Gilles
--
http
Hi I have started a small project with PyOpenGL. I am wondering what
are the options for a GUI. So far I checked PyUI but it has some
problems with 3d rendering outside the Windows platform.
I know of WxPython but I don't know if I can create a WxPython window,
use gl rendering code in it and then
https://gist.github.com/glenfant/7369894#file-pipetestserver-py-L173 ).
Is there a volunteer with a Windows box for helping me to get it fixed. Note: I
have no windows box to experiment alternate.
Many thanks by advance.
--
Gilles Lenfant
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
g "special stuffs" in my target tested modules.
Can someone point out good practices or dedicated tools that "remove
temporarily" the decorations.
I pasted a small example of what I heed at http://pastebin.com/20CmHQ7Y
Many thanks in advance
--
Gilles Lenfant
--
https://ma
ons/methods provided by 3rd party
tools
Cheers and thanks again for taking time to help me.
--
Gilles Lenfant
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
