ocket timeouts, so I ended up writing
my own replacement for socket._fileobject. I'd appreciate it if someone could
either explain to my why my new class was unnecessary, or else encourage me to
contribute it as a patch to the socket module.
Cheers,
Forest
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:18:23 -0300, Guilherme Polo wrote:
>I don't know why you think timeout is forbidden too, it is not.
I can't tell for sure whether it is or isn't, because of this language in
the socket module docs: "s.settimeout(0.0) is equivalent to
s.setblocking(0); s.settimeout(None) is
Bryan Olson wrote:
>Looking at the code for the existing _fileobject's read method, it
>will loose data it has already read if a socket.recv() call raises
>an exception. The function keeps buffers in a local variable that
>will be lost if an exception exits the scope. That much could be
>fixed wit
