Re: Generator slower than iterator?

2008-12-16 Thread Federico Moreira
The defaultdict option looks faster than the standard dict (20 secs aprox). Now i have: # import fileinput import sys from collections import defaultdict match_counter = defaultdict(int) for line in fileinput.input(sys.argv[1:]): match_counter[line.split()[0]] +=

Re: Generator slower than iterator?

2008-12-16 Thread Federico Moreira
2008/12/16 > Python 3.0 does not support has_key, it's time to get used to not using it > :) > Good to know line.split(None, 1)[0] really speeds up the proccess Thanks again. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Generator slower than iterator?

2008-12-16 Thread Federico Moreira
Hi all, Im parsing a 4.1GB apache log to have stats about how many times an ip request something from the server. The first design of the algorithm was for line in fileinput.input(sys.argv[1:]): ip = line.split()[0] if match_counter.has_key(ip): match_counter[ip] += 1 else:

Re: Generator slower than iterator?

2008-12-19 Thread Federico Moreira
Great, 2min 34 secs with the open method =) but why? ip, sep, rest = line.partition(' ') match_counter[ip] += 1 instead of match_counter[line.strip()[0]] += 1 strip really takes more time than partition? I'm having the same results with both of them right now. -- http://mail.python.org

Re: Generator slower than iterator?

2008-12-19 Thread Federico Moreira
Yep i meant split sorry. Thanks for the answer! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Generator slower than iterator?

2008-12-20 Thread Federico Moreira
Wow, thanks again =) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: python web programming for PHP programmers

2008-12-24 Thread Federico Moreira
You can try also web2py (http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/) but i think you may be interested on http://www.modpython.org/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list