Some entity, AKA Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> On the other hand, being actively beginner-hostile leads to nobody
> adopting the tool. Then again, if you don't mind being the last
> generation that'll ever use it, then I guess you're
Some entity, AKA Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> On Jun 21, 12:03 pm, Robert Uhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> Emacs is amazingly beginner-friendly for the power and flexibility it
> > >> p
Some entity, AKA [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> On Jun 22, 6:32 pm, Cor Gest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > HOW IN THE BLOODY HELL IS IT SUPPOSED TO OCCUR TO SOMEONE TO ENTER
> > > THEM, GIVEN THAT THEY HAVE TO D
Some entity, AKA Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> Boys, do you really not understand that this is a religious issue? You
> can't use arguments and logic to convince someone to convert their
> religion, and you can't use arguments a
Some entity, AKA JackT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> We don't care about the 1970 version of Emacs,
> because of course back then there WAS NO GUI.
But if you are blind as bat, any 2007's GUI is useless.
Cor
--
(defvar MyComputer
Some entity, AKA [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> Of course, for functional languages, 'lazy' means something rather
> different...
>
lazy means: just get a post-grad to do the grunt-work for free.
Cor
--
The biggest problem LISP has is that
Some entity, AKA "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote this
mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped)
> My website is now actually ranked higher than PaulGraham.com !
well well, so your site is more popular.
You can make it even more popular, you know.
Just rename some lame article about
Some entity, AKA Cthun ,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> And you omitted the #1 most serious objection to Xah's proposal,
> rantingrick, which is that to implement it would require unrealistic
> things such as replacing every 101-key keyboard with 10001-key
> key
