It's me wrote:
>
I am very happy that Python included *native* complex number
support.
And I have always been happy that FORTRAN supports them.
I really like Python's notion of having just one data type: the duck.
So have you considered using Python for your problem?
--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>
>> @corenames=qw(
>> rb_basic_islamic
>> sq1_pentagonTile
>> sq_arc501Tile
>> sq_arc503Tile
>> );
>
>
> Impractical to mix code and data, isn't it?
Obviously not impractical, given he did it quite easily and succinctly.
> chomp( my @corenames = );
>
> __DATA__
Tony Houghton wrote:
>
> How safe would I be assuming that
>
> sizeof(struct timeval) == 2 * sizeof(long)
>
> is always true on Linux on different architectures?
Based on what I was looking at today (well, yesterday now), you might
be wrong.
I do know that the size of a struct u
Big and Blue wrote:
> Tony Houghton wrote:
>>
>> How safe would I be assuming that
>> sizeof(struct timeval) == 2 * sizeof(long)
>>
>> is always true on Linux on different architectures?
>
>Based on what I was looking at today (well
