e suiting your needs might be the best choice. On the other hand, no one is
able to predict which code might be generated by a specific HLL-compiler.
Greetings from Augsburg
Bernhard Schornak
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
func:...
...
0:dec rcx
jbe 1f
...
some
code
to
perform
...
jmp 0b
p2align 5,,31
1:continue
with
something
else
...
Greetings from Augsburg
Bernhard Schornak
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e the mixture of
deleted
text parts, older and newer text posted at 10:58 h. Unfortunately, the option
to
remove messages from the server became the victim of another "improvement", so
it
is impossible for me to delete the other post.
Bernhard Schornak
Skybuck Flying wrote:
Because
wolfgang kern wrote:
> Bernhard Schornak replied to a "Flying-Bucket-post":
>
> Methink we all know about the often not-so-logical ideas from
> Buck, they merely come from an abstracted view and are far away
> from todays hardware given opportunities.
>
> OTOH,
ir flaws are revealed. ;)
BTW: If this button ever existed, it'll exist throughout the runtime of the loop
without disappearing. Hence, it is not necessary to query its existence in each
iteration, because it costs a lot of precious time. The best solution is the one
above - check if the button exists, then start the loop.
Greetings from Augsburg
Bernhard Schornak
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
