It occurred to me as I was writing a for loop that I would like to
write it in generator comprehension syntax, eg.
for a in b if c:
rather than using one of the more verbose but allowable syntaxes:
for a in (x for x in b if c):
for a in b:
if not c: continue
Python 3.1 does not suppo
On Feb 11, 3:47 pm, Westley Martínez wrote:
> No, too confusing. Then people'll want compound loops e.g.:
>
> for a in b if c while d else return x:
> print('Ha ha I'm so clever!')
On Feb 11, 6:34 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with writing
>
> for x in iterable:
> if
