Is mod_python 3.1 good for commercial blogging/CMS?

2005-11-07 Thread Anthony L.
I am writing a web application that is comparable to a content management system used in blogging. I really want to use Python after having done some evaluation coding using Python 2.3.5 with mod_python 3.1.4 running on Apache 2.0 with the Publisher handler. However, I am still very hesitant to

Re: Is mod_python 3.1 good for commercial blogging/CMS?

2005-11-08 Thread Anthony L.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ben Sizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anthony L. wrote: > > 1. I want to use CGI through Publisher handler, instead of CGI handler > > or PSP. Despite the speed increase mod_python gives me, there is a > > proble

Re: Is mod_python 3.1 good for commercial blogging/CMS?

2005-11-08 Thread Anthony L.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Francois Lepoutre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3. I am not very attracted to PSP because I want to separate the logic > > from the presentation as completely as possible [...] > > In view of your project why not consider cherrypy as well? It may > be an alte

Re: Is mod_python 3.1 good for commercial blogging/CMS?

2005-11-08 Thread Anthony L.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John J. Lee) wrote: > "Ben Sizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > > It as not easy to work with the CGI-style code in a WYSIWYG web editor > > as it is to edit a template, which is probably the main reason for > > their use. Also, coding ev