> I was using VC++.net and IDLE, respectively. I had expected C++ to be
> way faster. However, while the python code gave the result almost
- This code runs amortized 100ms on my machien (vc.net 2003 pro,
dinkumware stl, p4m 2.2GHz thinkpad, windows 2003 server), (10 loops in
1000ms)
- with STLPo
> Hi, I'm learning STL and I wrote some simple code to compare the
> efficiency of python and STL.
Hi, you are benching heap allocations and of course heap fragmentation.
this is what devpartner c++ profiler had to say:
Method %in % with Called Average Real Name Method Children
