g the life time of an object.
>
>It's usually phrased as "a and b are the same object". If the object
>is mutable, then changing a will also change b. If a and b aren't
>mutable, then it doesn't really matter whether they share a physical
>address.
That last sen
hey'll still be compared char-for-char
>until there's a difference.
Without looking at the code, I'm pretty sure there's a hash check first.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail..." --Siobhan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
bage collected.
That's old news, fixed in 2.5 or 2.6 IIRC -- interned strings now get
collected by refcounting like everything else.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail.
In article <50959154$0$6880$e4fe5...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Hans Mulder wrote:
>On 3/11/12 20:41:28, Aahz wrote:
>> In article <50475822$0$6867$e4fe5...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>> Hans Mulder wrote:
>>> On 5/09/12 15:19:47, Franck Ditter wrote:
>>>
ks clumsy next to the Haskell.
If you want more Pythonic, follow PEP8 in your formatting. ;-)
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail..." --Siobhan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
, and will probably sneer or laugh at you
> privately. And possibly publicly too.
>
>- If you hope to convince the Python community to change ,
> we are constrained by backwards-compatibility issues, policies, and
> design decisions. Frequently there are (mis-)features that
self.username
>
>to be:
>
>def __unicode__(self):
>return unicode(self.username)
>
>This never got noticed before because normally, self.username already is
>a unicode string, so it just works.
You apparently need more coffee when programming after waking up! (
sometimes do. (Or so I am lead to believe.)
>
>This sonds like a good use case for a context manager, like the one in
>decimal.Context.get_manager().
Note that because get_manager() applies to a specific Context instance it
is safe in a threaded application, which is NOT tr
gt; >>> (a[:, 0] + a[:, 1]) / 2
>array([1, 1, 2])
I'd actually think it should be the max. Consider a stereo where one
side is playing a booming bass while the other side is playing a rest
note -- should the mono combination be half as loud as as the bass?
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraf
gt; print(x)
>> print(y)
>
>I was tempted to post that myself, but he said /simpler/ ;)
>From my POV, that *is* simpler. When you change the parameters for foo,
you don't need to change the arg pre-processing. Also allows code reuse,
probably any program needing this
port *`` ignores any module global names in foo that start
with a single leading underscore. Obviously, this has little effect for
most Python programs because you DON'T USE ``import *``.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail..." --Siobhan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
amespace
>to the function readlines so there should be no confusion. At least not
>for a moderately experienced programmer, beginners can be confused by the
>littlest things sometimes.
Actually, as an experienced programmer, I *do* think it is confusing as
evidenced by the mistake
s lying around:
domain = MAILTO.split('@',1)[1]
server = str(dns.resolver.query(domain, 'MX')[0].exchange)
You'll need to play around a bit to find out what that does, but it
should point you in the right direction.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*&g
In article ,
Roy Smith wrote:
>In article ,
> Dave Angel wrote:
>>
>> I'd also add a print statement, just to assure yourself that it's running.
>
>My trick to make sure something is running is to add "assert 0".
``1/0`` is
't access the file, you can't access it. (Not to
>dismiss your question; I just wonder how you're going to handle the
>different cases)
Real-life use case for user-requested operation: if no permission, skip
the file "permanently" (until it changes, at least); if locke
[posted & e-mailed]
In article ,
Florian Friesdorf wrote:
>
>An alternative to mixin-based subclassing:
>
>http://pypi.python.org/pypi/plumber
You'll probably get more interest if you provide a summary.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*>
r, and that was considered too
>drastic a change.
...especially given CPython's goal of easy integration with C libraries.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Programming language design is not a rational science. Most reasoning
abou
ery way, especially the C client library and the wire protocol.)
Can you point at a reference for the latter? I have been trying to
convince my company that PG is better than MySQL.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Beware of companies t
gt;>> doubt that it's enough faster to warrnat this kludge).
>>
>> I'm with Aahz. =A0Don't do that.
>>
>> I don't know what you're doing, but I suspect an even better solution
>> would be to have your program run a "reconfigu
In article <87bp1a3g59@benfinney.id.au>,
Ben Finney wrote:
>a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
>
>>>(I always recommend people to use PostgreSQL, though; which is
>>>superior in almost every way, especially the C client library and the
>>>wire protoc
ll out the cmp=
>argument in cases where they use the cmp() builtin in 2.x?
Actually, my take is that removing __cmp__ was a mistake. (I already
argued about it back in python-dev before it happened, and I see little
point rehashing it. My reason is strictly efficiency grounds: when
compariso
In article <4d9f32a2$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
Lie Ryan wrote:
>On 04/09/11 01:08, Aahz wrote:
>>
>> Actually, my take is that removing __cmp__ was a mistake. (I already
>> argued about it back in python-dev before it happened, and I see little
>> point reh
ronment. It's available in iTunes
>at http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pypad/id428928902?mt=8#
There's nothing wrong with advertising this, I suggest that you also
announce it on c.l.py.announce
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
&
hat you want, and now you just need to gussy it up in an editor.
I've never used it myself, but IIRC ipython does what you want very
nicely.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"At Resolver we've found it useful to short-circuit
MainThread? Or should this be done in a
>separate thread being informed about a keyboard exception by the main
>thread?
Outside of signals, there should not be a problem with that. I don't
have time to look further, I just noticed that nobody responded.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com
In article ,
Terry Reedy wrote:
>On 4/11/2011 11:54 AM, Aahz wrote:
>> In article,
>> Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey, all. A co-worker asked me a question, and I've got no idea how (or
>>> if) it can be done. Bottom line: he'd like
rams?
from __future__ import absolute_import
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"At Resolver we've found it useful to short-circuit any doubt and just
refer to comments in code as 'lies'. :-)"
--Mic
le.loads() releases the GIL, but it doesn't; you need to
use pickle.load() (and cStringIO if you want to do it in memory).
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"At Resolver we've found it useful to short-circuit any doub
uestion, I find this
more readable:
if x not in cache:
Without testing, I'm not sure, but I believe it's more efficient, too
(creates fewer bytecodes).
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"At Resolver we've found
e to work on those sorts of machine
>when possible. Of course, they're not right for every application,
>especially since they're so expensive.
Do these use shared memory?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
The way to build l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>You could ask over on comp.lang.python.education
comp.lang.python.education is a rogue newsgroup; it won't appear on many
newsservers.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*>
e for November 10 but
haven't settled anything yet. Please send e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to suggest an agenda (or volunteer
to give a presentation). The meeting agenda for December 8 has been set.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
expressions." Now they have two problems.' --Jamie Zawinski
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
d-discipline interface.
Bingo! There's a reason why one Python motto is "Plays well with
others".
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e for November 10 but
haven't settled anything yet. Please send e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to suggest an agenda (or volunteer
to give a presentation). The meeting agenda for December 8 has been set.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com
ply isn't designed to be
machine-generated; there has been some discussion on the docutils
mailing lists about this, and I suggest you look in the archives.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a profe
rides, you need to program some "hooks"
>(an extra level of indirection, if you will).
Or wait for
foo = property('getFoo', 'setFoo')
(Currently proposed by Guido on python-dev)
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythonc
's hard to break the habit of
thirty years of programming! But I try very hard to stick with "name"
when I'm doing formal instruction.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>slightly confusing for the reader (since the other things might have
>other meanings and purposes) while 'object()' shouldn't be.
What's your preferred idiom when you're dealing with storable objects?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://w
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>the canonical idiom when you need s
agenda for December 8 has been set. Please
send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to suggest an agenda
(or volunteer to give a presentation).
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Alex:
>>>Aahz:
>>>>Alex:
>>>>>
>>>>>the canonical idiom when you need such distinction is:
>>>>&
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
Am I the only person who immediately thought of Babylon 5 and wondered if
I was in the wrong newsgroup?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.
h attribute access. The
section part actually has multiple dicts (the sections) which are
layered, so that a dict key in the top layer overrides the value of the
key in lower layers. We traditionally have used it such that the
sections are accessed in MRU orders; last week, we added a new feat
, but your second-to-last sentence
is not. The reason Python people say to use something else is precisely
because we don't believe that one-size-fits-all. Some people use other
languages in addition to Python, and some people don't use Python at all.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
to take a look at Python.
Another option: just use the on-line tutorial at python.org
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
t;for strings. But it has no such parameters for lists. Why?
That's a fair cop. Submit a patch and it'll probably get accepted.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> Christoph deleted his own attribution:
>>>
>>>For instance, I just wanted to use the index() method on a tuple which
>>>does not work. ...
>>
>
tches would
>probably be welcome to rectify this state of affairs.
You're wrong. I don't have time/energy to look up the relevant posts,
but Guido has been extremely clear in the past that tuples are *NOT*
going to grow methods.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http
Python 3.0 (e.g. apply(),
which is superseded by *args/**kwargs being allows on the calling side).
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur.&
cle known as Guido. I suggest you write a PEP so
that whatever decision gets made, there's a document.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
d
assignment breaks, but not completely:
>>> t = ([1,2], [3,4])
>>> t[0] += [5]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
TypeError: object doesn't support item assignment
>>> t
([1, 2, 5], [3, 4])
(I'm pretty sure Skip has seen th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>>Christoph wrote:
>>>Aahz wrote:
>>>>Christoph wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>For instance, I just wanted to use the index() method on a tuple wh
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire
>yourself a competent schmuck.
Mind if I .sig this? How would you like to be attributed?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decision
er?
Take a look at PyGame.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire
yourself a competent schmuck." --USENET schmuck (aka Robert Kern)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[Since part of my post seems to have gotten lost in this thread, I
figured I would repeat it]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>Or, ano
7;re saying that for should implicitly invoke list (or maybe
>iter) on any object that it's passed that's not a list or iterator?
for does in fact implicitly invoke iter() on its loop expression.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
&q
e you're technically correct, I've been bitten too many times by
forgetting whether to use match() or search(). I've fixed that problem
by choosing to always use search() and combine with ^ as appropriate.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraf
;t packaged, and I want
a packaged OS.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire
yourself a competent schmuck." --USENET schmuck (aka Robert Kern)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sunday 04 December 2005 19:56, Aahz wrote:
>>
>> Of course, one can use Debian-testing, but that isn't packaged, and
>> I want a packaged OS.
>
>You probably mean that Tes
-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to suggest an agenda (or
volunteer to give a presentation).
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire
yourself a competent schmuck.&qu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Tim Peters? Read it no matter what the subject says.
A-men!
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making
ocess? Or do I (and others) simply need to keep repeating this
point endlessly?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire
yourself a competent schmuck." --USENET schmuck
aren't what you'd call a "real name". (People named
"piglet", "tigger", and "pooh", just for example, who were active long
before I showed up. Not to mention "piranha".)
ObSheesh: Sheesh
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>First, if `st` is a string, `st[::-1]` is a list. Do you really mean
>to compare string hashes with list hashes here? I'm going to assume
>not.
QOTW: Timbot makes an error ;
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2005-12-06, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hmm, I though he explaine
ot of the
problem: where does ``print`` get documented? If we can come up with a
good process for answering that question, we can probably fix a lot of
other problems. (Note emphasis on the word "process".)
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
&quo
s I
>don't care about to click on "sys" or "datetime" motivated me to write
>my little hack.
That's why I use Lynx! ;-) ("/]re" takes me right to regex docs)
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"
had had had had had had had a better
>effect on the reader
"I'd like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God."
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire
your
e the semantics the same
>and only some trivial details are different?)
Raymond Hettinger (and/or maybe one of the metaclass wizards) can
probably also write it, with Guido editing after. That might produce
even more accuracy in the end.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> ht
system that the Python code is
>actually running on safe? Ruby may have a real bastion mode, but
>Python doesn't.
Just run the Python code chrooted.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making
set of people who
would argue that I18N is *always* a concern -- it's just that a lot of
people either don't know it yet or ignore it.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you thi
love checked
exceptions but has come to regard them as the horror that they are.
I've learned to just write "throws Exception" at the declaration of
every method.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't a
filling them
in, testing operation as I go. This isn't even unit-testing -- I haven't
drunk that Kool-Aid yet.
This is easy because running a Python program is faster than invoking the
Java compiler -- and you still haven't tested the actual operation of
your Java program.
--
A
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>I was pretty skeptical of Java's checked exceptions wh
*READABLE* as Python.
>> ;-)
>
>Shouldn't that be ;-)) ?
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/90q2/lispcode.html
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
nce
>clearly says Python can be used for commercial applications. Is there
>any other implications like that of GPL to make the source open ?
Are you looking to embed Python as a scripting language or to write the
software in Python?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Aahz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>That's funny -- Bruce Eckel
ython, and one for improving docs. Giving the PSF more money increases
the chances for additional work.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing." -
de-centric view of the universe. Therefore you encode *FROM*
Unicode and you decode *TO* Unicode. Period. It's similar to the way
floating point contaminates ints.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz:
>>
>> The first three PSF grants were all in some way not directly related to
>> changing the core language. One was for a library, one for improving
>> Jython, and one for improving docs. Giv
a bunch of final format
>stuff and drop it on someone else to put into the latex format so it
>can be included.
Not clear what you mean here.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Bowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Thanks, typically how long does it take for any documentation to be
>considered and implemented?
It varies. (I could write a much longer response, but it would boil
down to the same thing.
e GPL is if you copy GPL source.
That's not true -- consider linking to a GPL library.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ers are attempting to achieve: vendor lock-in.
>
>I think I stated that clearly.
And my counter-argument is that I believe your perception is wrong. If
I agreed with your focus on lock-in, I'd say that what the GPL is trying
to lock in is a specific legal philosophy by subverting
owned by Infoseek before getting transferred to
Verity through a series of dot-bomb transactions. The Ultraseek engine
doesn't use Python, but Python is used to control the engine, and I think
much of the spider is written in Python.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> ht
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stephen Waterbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Stephen Waterbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>Also see Python Success Stories: http://pythonology.org/s
end said something like, "In the year 2000, there will be a
programming language. I don't know what it will look like, and I don't
know what it will do. But I do know one thing: it will be called
FORTRAN."
After all, FORTRAN 2003 contains OOP support
--
Aahz ([EMAIL
Secret Illuminati Eye-In-The-Pyramid(tm) Decoder ring,
>> Utility Belt & Pouches
>> ===
>>
>
>
>
>The Illuminati really have infiltrated our society.
Stay alert!
Trust no one!
Keep your laser handy!
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lucas Raab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Lucas Raab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Sean P. Kane wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Equipment: Red Reflec Armour,
asn't earlier documented. So I filed a bug report. ;-) If you
think this still isn't enough, file another.)
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is no
other excellent reasons you've been
provided.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
l learn that Guido believes super() should only be used
with class hierarchies explicitly designed for the purpose. Given that,
you'd have to do a lot of other changes to support super() and it's less
outrageous.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pytho
clean as it once was. It
>has grown warts, for the sake of backwards compatibility. :(
That's progress. One of the primary goals for Python 3.0 is to make a
fresh start by removing a lot of the backwards compatibility.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.p
pful.
Most people use Gooja to post because they're lazy.
>if you have internet access, you have NNTP access. gmane.org provides
>access to more than 6,500 mailing lists via NNTP, including all
>relevant Python forums.
You also have access to the free netnews
3) Examine the simulation results
>
>For this, I was thinking about threads... does anyone have other/better
>suggestion(s)? Does anyone see any difficulty/memory problems in using
>threads?
If you're not on Windows, this will be much easier with multiple
processes.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL
I'd like to hear some experiences about converting a shelf with pickles
to database with pickles, particularly if someone has handy code for
proxying shelve code. We're using PostgreSQL if that makes any
difference.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www
but there's nothing to stop you. What did you think the "direct"
>in "direct way" might have been intended to mean?
Actually, I like breaking out of nested "search" loops with try/except.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.py
age document to explain all these features, not for
non-technical users. reST fits both these criteria, but only for a
selected subset of featuers.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
1 - 100 of 1667 matches
Mail list logo
