On 30 May 2017 at 20:15, Deborah Swanson wrote:
> Why do you care so deeply what pip does on an operating system that is
> no longer supported?
Sigh. I guess we just have to agree to differ.
> And I'm sorry you're upset that pip is not behaving as expected, but
> please remember that this happen
On 30 May 2017 at 21:27, Deborah Swanson wrote:
> I have already offered to do whatever you would like me to do on this
> system - after I'm up and running on Linux. I need a functioning PyCharm
> on this system until that happens.
OK. I'm not sure I care enough to remind you, but if you want to
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 18:37:15 UTC+1, Irmen de Jong wrote:
> when creating an executable zip file using the zipapp module, it's a little
> sad to see
> that no effort is done to filter out obvious temporary files: the resulting
> zipfile
> contains any *.pyc/pyo files and other things such
On Friday, 28 July 2017 17:53:08 UTC+1, Irmen de Jong wrote:
> On 28/07/2017 18:36, Irmen de Jong wrote:
> > On 27/07/2017 00:03, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> If you want to create a feature request for a filter function on
> >> bugs.python.org and assign it to
On Sunday, 30 July 2017 07:21:00 UTC+1, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> 1. Perhaps nobody has thought of it.
>
> 2. The author of the library refused to allow it, or demanded
> conditions which the Python developers either cannot or will
> not meet.
>
> 3. The library is under rapid developme
On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 00:31:52 UTC+1, t...@tomforb.es wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that using `maxsize=None` is best for functions that
> accept no arguments? Should we even be using a `lru_cache` in such
> situations, or write our own simple cache decorator instead?
It seems like overki
On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 15:54:42 UTC+1, t...@tomforb.es wrote:
> > _sentinel = object()
> > _val = _sentinel
> > def val():
> > if _val is _sentinel:
> > # Calculate _val
> > return _val
> >
> > seems entirely sufficient for this case. Write a custom decorator if you
> > use th
On 8 August 2017 at 17:21, Steve Dower wrote:
> For a while I've been uploading the official releases to nuget.org. These
> packages can be installed with nuget.exe (latest version always available at
> https://aka.ms/nugetclidl), which is quickly becoming a standard tool in
> Microsoft's build to
On Friday, 25 August 2017 14:16:05 UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yep. We're in agreement on that. My only point about the confusion was
> the way in which you could get "wrong answers" in binary but "right
> answers" in decimal, leading to the "0.1 + 0.2 != 0.3" problem. That's
> a sum that works
On 27 November 2017 at 18:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>> If you have a Windows key, you can assign it to be
>> the Compose key.
>
> Would this be true on a machine running Windows? My work environment
> has me developing on Linux, with a Windows desktop. It's not clear to
> me that any sort of xmodm
401 - 410 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
