Chris Angelico writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:24 AM Jack Brandom wrote:
>>
>> Greg Ewing writes:
>>
>> > On 6/08/21 12:00 pm, Jack Brandom wrote:
>> >> It seems
>> >> that I'd begin at position 3 (that's "k" which I save somewhere), then I
>> >> subtract 1 from 3, getting 2 (that's "c", wh
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:25 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>> I came up with the following question. Using strings of length 5
>> (always), write a procedure histogram(s) that consumes a string and
>> produces a dictionary whose keys are each substrings (of the string) of
>>
Chris Angelico writes:
[...]
>> not disagreeing... and yeah I could have thought deeper about the
>> answer, but I still think "notthing has been OOP" -> "yes it has, they
>> just didn't realize it" was worth mentioning
>
> Oh yes, absolutely agree.
At the same time, inside the machine nothing
Mats Wichmann writes:
> On 8/9/21 3:07 PM, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>> I'm looking for questions to put on a test for students who never had
>> any experience with programming, but have learned to use Python's
>> procedures, default arguments, if-else, strings, tuples, lists and
>> dictionaries. (Th
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:14 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:25 AM Hope Rouselle
> > wrote:
> >> I came up with the following question. Using strings of length 5
> >> (always), write a procedure histogram(s) that consumes a string and
> >> pro
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:18 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>
> I totally agree with you but I didn't know that even numbers were like
> that in Python. In fact, I still don't quite believe it...
>
> >>> 2.__add__(3)
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Yeah, that's because "2." looks like the beginning of a
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:18 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> not disagreeing... and yeah I could have thought deeper about the
> >> answer, but I still think "notthing has been OOP" -> "yes it has, they
> >> just didn't realize it" was worth mentioning
> >
> >
On 8/10/2021 9:15 AM, Hope Rouselle wrote:
2.__add__(3)
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
But then I tried:
(2).__add__(3)
5
Add a space is easier.
>>> 2 .__add__(3)
5
>>>
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> On 9 Aug 2021, at 19:28, Lukas Lösche wrote:
>
> I'm on Python 3.9.6 and trying to make sense of the following behaviour:
>
from dataclasses import dataclass, fields
@dataclass
> ... class Foobar:
> ... name: str
> ...
fields(Foobar)[0].type
>
type(fields(Foobar)[0].typ
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:14 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>>
>> Chris Angelico writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:25 AM Hope Rouselle
>> > wrote:
>> >> I came up with the following question. Using strings of length 5
>> >> (always), write a procedure histogram(s) th
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 8/10/2021 9:15 AM, Hope Rouselle wrote:
> 2.__add__(3)
>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>> But then I tried:
>>
> (2).__add__(3)
>> 5
>
> Add a space is easier.
2 .__add__(3)
> 5
Hah. That's brilliant! So cool.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
Apologies for lateness.
Coincidentally, I've been asked to speak to our local Python Users'
Group on slicing. Herewith an attempt to modify those demos around your
data/question. Apologies if the result is thus somewhat lacking in flow.
Also, whereas I prefer to illustrate 'how it works', I percei
On 8/10/2021 5:27 PM, Hope Rouselle wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
On 8/10/2021 9:15 AM, Hope Rouselle wrote:
2.__add__(3)
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
But then I tried:
(2).__add__(3)
5
Add a space is easier.
2 .__add__(3)
5
Hah. That's brilliant! So cool.
Python is a little loose
13 matches
Mail list logo
