On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 10:36:30AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Nick also explains that, because the name ‘_’ has too many conventional
> meanings already, the name ‘__’ is better for “don't need this value but
> I am required to specify a name”.
_() is often bound to gettext.gettext() in the globa
On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 2:41:43 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 26May2018 04:02, Subhabrata Banerjee wrote:
> >On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 3:54:37 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> >> It sounds like you want a more general purpose parser, and that depends
> >> upon
> >> your purp
On 5/27/18 7:43 AM, subhabangal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 2:41:43 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>> On 26May2018 04:02, Subhabrata Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 3:54:37 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
It sounds like you want a more general pu
Hey list! I might have encountered a "bug", or maybe it's just a "design
decision" :)
Here's some example code:
https://gist.github.com/santiagobasulto/3513a50ec0dc939e8f7bb2ecfa8d4ae2
The problem is `ThreadPoolExecutor.map()`. It's not returning tasks "as
completed" but sequentially. I understa
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Mikhail V wrote:
> Hi.
> I've put some thoughts together, and
> need some feedback on this proposal.
> Main question is: Is it convincing?
> Is there any flaw?
> My own opinion - there IS something to chase.
> Still the justification for such syntax is hard.
>
Th
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:12 AM Santiago Basulto
wrote:
> Hey list! I might have encountered a "bug", or maybe it's just a "design
> decision" :)
> Here's some example code:
> https://gist.github.com/santiagobasulto/3513a50ec0dc939e8f7bb2ecfa8d4ae2
> The problem is `ThreadPoolExecutor.map()`. I
So, on Unix I would use
Image.show(title=None, nameofdisplayutilty), or Image.show(title=None,
scriptname) #where script with name scriptname invokes the program
I will try this now! And thank you.
On 26/05/2018 19:30, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2018 17:17:42 +0200, Paul St Geo
This is very helpful indeed, thank you. Awe-inspiring.
It occurred to me that I could edit the PIL/ImageShow.py, replacing ‘xv’
(in five places) with the utility of my choice and using ‘executable’ as
the command.
Or, is this just not done?
On 26/05/2018 19:11, Peter Otten wrote:
Paul St Ge
hi,
I'm using the Google Sheets API (the client library rather than the
RESTful interface) and I'm confused about the meaning of the syntax
diagrams. This is from
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/documentation/sheets/v4/python/latest/sheets_v4.spreadsheets.values.html#updat
oops, please ignore the bit before "update(spreadsheetId=*, range=*, ..."
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Paul wrote:
> hi,
>I'm using the Google Sheets API (the client library rather than the
> RESTful interface) and I'm confused about the meaning of the syntax
> diagrams. This is from
>
On 27May2018 20:15, Paul St George wrote:
This is very helpful indeed, thank you. Awe-inspiring.
It occurred to me that I could edit the PIL/ImageShow.py, replacing
‘xv’ (in five places) with the utility of my choice and using
‘executable’ as the command.
Or, is this just not done?
It bec
On Sun, 27 May 2018 21:17:57 +, Paul wrote:
> hi,
>I'm using the Google Sheets API (the client library rather than the
> RESTful interface) and I'm confused about the meaning of the syntax
> diagrams.
*Diagrams*? As in, *pictures*?
> update(spreadsheetId=*, range=*, body=*, valueInputOp
On 2018-05-27 22:17, Paul wrote:
hi,
I'm using the Google Sheets API (the client library rather than the
RESTful interface) and I'm confused about the meaning of the syntax
diagrams. This is from
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/documentation/sheets/v4/python/latest/shee
On 5/25/18 6:28 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 02:58:06 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Your mail/news client might choose to represent configure.ac as a link,
>> since ".ac" is a valid TLD.
> Isn't *everything* a valid TLD now?
>
> For the right price, at least.
>
Not quite, .i
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/25/18 6:28 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 02:58:06 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> Your mail/news client might choose to represent configure.ac as a link,
>>> since ".ac" is a valid TLD.
>> Isn't *everything* a val
Am 27.05.18 um 23:58 schrieb Cameron Simpson:
On 27May2018 20:15, Paul St George wrote:
This is very helpful indeed, thank you. Awe-inspiring.
It occurred to me that I could edit the PIL/ImageShow.py, replacing
‘xv’ (in five places) with the utility of my choice and using
‘executable’ as the
16 matches
Mail list logo
