On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.6
release team, I am happy to announce the availability of Python 3.6.4,
the fourth maintenance release of Python 3.6. Detailed information
about the changes made in 3.6.4 can be found in the change log here:
https://docs.python.org/3
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:27 am, ast wrote:
> I discovered that log functions from math module
> works with integers, whatever their size, there is
> no conversion to float.
>
>> import math
>> x = 123456**123456
>> math.log10(x)
> 628577.7303641582 (instantaneous)
>
> so 628578 digits
Nice!
I
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 4:38:17 AM UTC+5:30, Les Cargill wrote:
> oliver wrote:
> > That would be amazing. I still have nightmares of when I had to create this
> > big options analysis VBA program in Excel 2007.
> >
>
>
> Odd - I haven't found VBA itself to be all that horrible. Yeah, i
I have a problem with this code, it seems to work but first it shows
the picture then supposed to iterate through file list and shows them
each changed after 3seconds however show just the last one from list.
https://paste.pound-python.org/show/txvB4IBtlUrn3TuB0rtu/
--
https://mail.python.org/
On 19/12/17 18:33, Ziggy wrote:
I have a problem with this code, it seems to work but first it shows
the picture then supposed to iterate through file list and shows them
each changed after 3seconds however show just the last one from list.
https://paste.pound-python.org/show/txvB4IBtlUrn3TuB
On 2017-12-19 18:33, Ziggy wrote:
I have a problem with this code, it seems to work but first it shows
the picture then supposed to iterate through file list and shows them
each changed after 3seconds however show just the last one from list.
https://paste.pound-python.org/show/txvB4IBtlUrn3T
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:57:27 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Peng Yu writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to extract "a...@efg.hij.xyz". But it only shows ".hij".
>
> Others have address this question. I'll answer a separate one:
>
>> Does anybody see what is wrong with it? Thanks.
>
> One thing th
On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 10:16:07 PM UTC-8, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Where or how have you looked so far? How formal do you want?
i want full-on formal with lots of rigor and every possible detail spelled out;
i've looked in a couple of books but my best lead so far is a paper by knuth
call
Grats to all!
On 19 December 2017 at 00:42, Ned Deily wrote:
> On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.6
> release team, I am happy to announce the availability of Python 3.6.4,
> the fourth maintenance release of Python 3.6. Detailed information
> about the changes made
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 7:21 AM, alister via Python-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:57:27 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>> A more correct match would boil down to:
>>
>> * Match any printable Unicode characters (not just ASCII).
>>
>> * Locate the *last* ‘@’ character. (An email address may contai
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:21:02 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 7:21 AM, alister via Python-list
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:57:27 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>>> A more correct match would boil down to:
>>>
>>> * Match any printable Unicode characters (not just ASCII).
>>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017, at 02:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Hmm, is that true? I was under the impression that the quoting rules
> were impossible to match with a regex. Or maybe it's just that they're
> impossible to match with a *standard* regex, but the extended
> implementations (including Python'
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 07:23 am, namenobodywa...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 10:16:07 PM UTC-8, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> Where or how have you looked so far? How formal do you want?
>
> i want full-on formal with lots of rigor and every possible detail spelled
> out; i've loo
Has any thought been given to adding elif to the for statement?
for x in foo:
if y: break
elif a==b:
something
else:
something else
as a shortcut to:
for x in foo:
if y: break
else:
if a==b:
something
else:
something else
bob gailer
--
https://mail.python.org/
bob gailer wrote:
Has any thought been given to adding elif to the for statement?
I don't think it is a good idea because it needlessly, from my point of
view, embeds too much complexity into a single construct (making it more
difficult to maintain, for instance). That's what language designe
Apologies. Misread your question.
Skip
On Dec 19, 2017 6:16 PM, "Skip Montanaro" wrote:
>
> Has any thought been given to adding elif to the for statement?
>
>
> Time machine at work I think:
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-if-statement
>
> Skip
>
--
https://mai
Has any thought been given to adding elif to the for statement?
Time machine at work I think:
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-if-statement
Skip
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2017-12-18 20:16, MRAB wrote:
> Those who use Excel might find this interesting:
>
> Microsoft Considers Adding Python as an Official Scripting Language to
> Excel
> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-considers-adding-python-as-an-official-scripting-language-to-excel/
>
This is possibly a question for the list admins...
I notice that Lawrence D’Oliveiro has taken up labelling his posts with a
demand that his posts are not to be posted to the Python-List mailing list.
I also see that his posts are not showing up on the mailing list archive. Is
this a coincidence
19 matches
Mail list logo
