I am trying to gain a clear understanding on pd.merge(df,df2, on=['Code',
'Region']).
Can anyone assist?
Regards,
David
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:26:04AM +, David Shi via Python-list wrote:
> I am trying to gain a clear understanding on pd.merge(df,df2, on=['Code',
> 'Region']).
> Can anyone assist?
ncq@hermes:~$ python
Python 2.7.14 (default, Sep 17 2017, 18:50:44)
[GCC 7.2.0] on li
Ned Batchelder writes:
> All of this could have been avoided. Steve called an idea arrogant.
> Jon felt that Steve was calling him arrogant. If Steve had simply
> said, "I'm sorry, I didn't mean that to apply to you," we wouldn't be
> here now. Why is it so hard to treat people as if they matter
On 8 November 2017 at 11:15, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:26:04AM +, David Shi via Python-list wrote:
>
>> I am trying to gain a clear understanding on pd.merge(df,df2, on=['Code',
>> 'Region']).
>> Can anyone assist?
>
> ncq@hermes:~$ python
> Python 2
I have a nested dictionary of defaultdict(dict) whose sub dict have int keys
and lists (list of ints) as values,
'A' = {2092: [1573], 2093: [1576, 1575], 2094: [1577], 2095:
[1574]}'B' = {2098: [1], 2099: [2, 3], 2101: [4], 2102: [5]}'C' =
{2001: [6], 2003: [7, 8], 2004: [9], 2005: [10]}
I union
Hello!
Eryk, your solution is the best solution for me:
os.stat(drive).st_dev
I don't need the real ID. I write a Recycle Bin manager in Python - for my
machine only.
It just simply registers all rec. bin files to an SQLite DB (only the new
ones with a date).
After 30 days it deletes too old
Dear all,
I have a software code that is written in python and has a structure like this.
package/
run_my_gui.py#gui
sub_package/
main.py
sub_sub_package/
__init__.py
A.py
B.py
C.py
All the imports in main.py are absolute and look lik
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> Not one of these is syntactically invalid. Why should "else without
>>> break" be trapped by the parser? Your other examples mostly have good
>>> parser-level reasons for being errors
>>
>
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I was not referring to the possible future use of yield from for async
> generators; I was referring to the possibility *today* of using "yield
> from" as a synonym for *await*. As far as I know the only major
> obstacle to that is that the author
Daiyue Weng wrote:
> I have a nested dictionary of defaultdict(dict) whose sub dict have int
> keys and lists (list of ints) as values,
>
> 'A' = {2092: [1573], 2093: [1576, 1575], 2094: [1577], 2095:
> [1574]}'B' = {2098: [1], 2099: [2, 3], 2101: [4], 2102: [5]}'C' =
> {2001: [6], 2003: [7, 8],
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> I was not referring to the possible future use of yield from for async
>> generators; I was referring to the possibility *today* of using "yield
>> from" as a synonym for *await*. As far as
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> I was not referring to the possible future use of yield from for async
>>> generators; I was referring to the possibility *today* of us
On 2017-11-08, Ben Finney wrote:
> I also think Jon had cause to bristle somewhat at the characterisation.
> I don't think Jon was attacked by Steve's remark, but I do sympathise
> with the instinct to feel a criticism as an attack.
Steve called me arrogant, that's an attack - never mind that he
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
I was not referring to the possible future use of yield from for async
>>>
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2017-11-08, Ben Finney wrote:
>> I also think Jon had cause to bristle somewhat at the characterisation.
>> I don't think Jon was attacked by Steve's remark, but I do sympathise
>> with the instinct to feel a criticism as an attack.
>
> Stev
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Except that "yield from" is used by generators to delegate to other
>> generators, and "await" is used by coroutines to delegate to other
>> coroutines. In an asynchronous generator, "yiel
On 11/08/2017 11:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> If that's true, then it's not possible for software to be
> "opinionated" either, because that definitely implies something human.
> And it's illogical to say "Windows is feeling cranky today" when
> something inexplicably fails. Nor should you talk a
Assuming df and df2 are dataframes you are essentially doing a SQL-like join of
the two objects where the records within match on both the Code and Region
columns
Sent from my iPhone
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> This reminds me of a classic video clip from a few years ago. The new
> Microsoft "We Share Your Pain" program.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D28FkfJiauk
I've never actually seen this before. That's awesome! Thanks for sharing :)
Chr
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> Except that "yield from" is used by generators to delegate to other
>>> generators, and "await" is used by coroutines to delegat
Jon Ribbens writes:
> On 2017-11-08, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I also think Jon had cause to bristle somewhat at the characterisation.
> > I don't think Jon was attacked by Steve's remark, but I do sympathise
> > with the instinct to feel a criticism as an attack.
>
> Steve called me arrogant, that'
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> If you call an idea arrogant you are necessarily stating that the
>> person espousing the idea is guilty of arrogance - that's what the
>> word means.
>
> Yes: it describes the behaviour. It does not imply characterisation of
> the person.
>
> T
On 11/8/17 5:22 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Jon Ribbens writes:
On 2017-11-08, Ben Finney wrote:
I also think Jon had cause to bristle somewhat at the characterisation.
I don't think Jon was attacked by Steve's remark, but I do sympathise
with the instinct to feel a criticism as an attack.
Steve
On 09Nov2017 05:29, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2017-11-08, Ben Finney wrote:
I also think Jon had cause to bristle somewhat at the characterisation.
I don't think Jon was attacked by Steve's remark, but I do sympathise
with the instinct to fee
Jon Ribbens :
> It is my experience of this group/list that if one disagrees with any
> of you, Steve and Chris, you all rally round and gang up on that
> person to insult and belittle them. This makes the atmosphere quite
> hostile, and it would be quite remarkable if it isn't hurting the
> commun
Ned Batchelder writes:
> On 11/8/17 5:22 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > To say that someone is being arrogant simply is not an attack, and I
> > really want you to see that.
> Ben, this idea is really stupid!
>
> Be honest: when you read what I just wrote, did you feel a
> dispassionate discussion sta
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> Jon Ribbens :
> > It is my experience of this group/list that if one disagrees with any
> > of you, Steve and Chris, you all rally round and gang up on that
> > person to insult and belittle them. This makes the atmosphere quite
> > hostile, and it would be quite remarkab
How can I covert numbers into word like ex:-123 One hundred twenty three?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 10:51:35 PM UTC-8, r16...@rguktrkv.ac.in
wrote:
> How can I covert numbers into word like ex:-123 One hundred twenty three?
That's a classic homework exercise. Expect guidance, not an answer.
Why don't you solve a related, but simpler task first? This is a goo
Chris Angelico wrote:
I don't understand why you would use "yield from" as a synonym for
"await". They are not equivalent. Why would you use one in place of
the other?
As far as I understand, currently the implementations of "yield from"
and "await" are sufficiently similar that they *would* be
30 matches
Mail list logo
