Steve D'Aprano writes:
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 02:58 pm, Deborah Swanson wrote:
>
>>> It's possible to select either l1 or l2 using an expression,
>>> and then subscript that with [v]. However, this does not
>>> usually make for readable code, so I don't recommend it.
>>>
>>> (l1 if whatever else l2
Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
drift, but I'm about four sheets to the wind right now, and no way would
I make it more than a step or two in playing around with these things
and trying to get my head around them before it would all descend into a
cacaphony
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 3:39:14 PM UTC+5:30, Deborah Swanson wrote:
> Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
> drift, but I'm about four sheets to the wind right now, and no way would
> I make it more than a step or two in playing around with these things
> a
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 7:51:12 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 3:39:14 PM UTC+5:30, Deborah Swanson wrote:
> > Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
> > drift, but I'm about four sheets to the wind right now, and no way would
On 2016-12-31, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2016 3:12 AM, wrote:
>
> That's true.
>
> Please include quoted context in your replies. I have no idea who or what
> you're responding to.
I'd just like to thank everybody for replying to einstein1410's posts
so that those of us who have plonked post
Steve D'Aprano wrote
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 10:25 PM
>
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 02:58 pm, Deborah Swanson wrote:
>
> >> It's possible to select either l1 or l2 using an
> expression, and then
> >> subscript that with [v]. However, this does not usually make for
> >> readable code, so
Chris Angelico wrote on Saturday, December 31, 2016 9:39 PM
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Deborah Swanson
> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand what you did here, at least not
> well enough
> > to try it.
> >
> > What conditional can I do between the 2 rows of listings (the list
> > na
> -Original Message-
> From: Python-list
> [mailto:python-list-bounces+python=deborahswanson.net@python.o
> rg] On Behalf Of Jussi Piitulainen
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 11:45 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Cleaning up conditionals
> Importance: High
>
>
> Debo
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 14:35:46 -0800, "Deborah Swanson"
declaimed the following:
if len(l1[v]) == 0 and len(l2[v]) != 0:
l1[v] = l2[v]
elif len(l2[v]) == 0 and len(l1[v]) != 0:
l2[v] = l1[v]
elif l1[v] != l2[v]:
ret += ", " + labels[v] + " diff" if
On 01/01/2017 14:32, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 7:51:12 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 3:39:14 PM UTC+5:30, Deborah Swanson wrote:
Sorry guys. I've read all your responses and I kind of get their general
drift, but I'm about four sheets to th
The re module defines several flags that affect the compilation of a
pattern string. For instance, re.I == re.IGNORECASE results in
case-insensitive matching.
But what if you want part of a pattern to be case sensitive and part
not? For instance, the IDLE colorizer needs to match keywords an
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote, on Sunday, January 01, 2017 6:07 PM
>
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:50:25 -0800, "Deborah Swanson"
> declaimed the following:
>
> >Maybe it would help if I give a couple rows of (made up)
> data to show
> >what I mean (first row is field titles):
> >
> >..Description
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
\> 3.6 added syntax for 'local flags'.
> '''
> (?imsx-imsx:...)
>
> (Zero or more letters from the set 'i', 'm', 's', 'x', optionally
> followed by '-' followed by one or more letters from the same set.) The
> letters set or removes the corres
On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 10:41:22 -0800, einstein1410 wrote:
> What contribution I had made especially valuable?
Ask your mommy what sarcasm means.
--
GNU/Linux user #557453
The cow died so I don't need your bull!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2016-12-31, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Dec 31, 2016 3:12 AM, wrote:
>>
>> That's true.
>>
>> Please include quoted context in your replies. I have no idea who or what
>> you're responding to.
>
> I'd just like to thank everybody for replying
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Since they're unlikely to do that however,
Then again, I see that einstein1410 made a couple of rather aggressive
posts 11 hours ago that haven't made it to my email, so maybe he did
manage to get himself banned.
--
https://mail.python.org/mail
On 02/01/17 06:40, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
Since they're unlikely to do that however,
Then again, I see that einstein1410 made a couple of rather aggressive
posts 11 hours ago that haven't made it to my email, so maybe he did
manage to get himself ba
17 matches
Mail list logo
