On Sunday 28 August 2016 15:56, Juan Pablo Romero Méndez wrote:
> 2016-08-27 21:30 GMT-07:00 Steve D'Aprano :
[...]
>> Now it is true that speaking in full generality, classes and types refer to
>> different things. Or to be perhaps more accurate, *subclassing* and
>> *subtyping* are different thi
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
>>> This is where I'm less sure. Sometimes a variable's type should be
>>> broader than just one concrete type - for instance, a variable might
>>> hold 1 over here, and 1.5 over there, and thus is storing either
>>
On Sunday 28 August 2016 15:29, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Steve D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> But the author of this piece ignores that standard distinction and invents
>> his own non-standard one: to him, classes are merely different
>> representations of the same data. E.g
Am 28.08.2016 um 00:45 schrieb Terry Reedy:
> On 8/27/2016 3:35 PM, Joe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using Python 3.5.1 with PyUSB 1.0 under Win 10 (64). We try to read
>> the USB output of a DMM 'UT61B'.
>>
>> import usb.core
>> import usb.util
>> import usb.backend.libusb1
>>
>> def Gosub():
>>
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sunday 28 August 2016 15:29, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> It might be a good way of thinking about points on a Cartesian plane,
>> though. Rectangular and polar coordinates truly are just different
>> ways of expressing the same information.
Am 28.08.2016 um 00:34 schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 8/26/2016 7:58 PM, ROGER GRAYDON CHRISTMAN wrote:
"If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck,... "
so there is indeed precedence for this so-called 'duck typing'
but wouldn't it be more Pythonic to call this 'witch typing'?
"How do you know sh
On 8/28/2016 5:13 AM, Joe wrote:
Am 28.08.2016 um 00:45 schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 8/27/2016 3:35 PM, Joe wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Python 3.5.1 with PyUSB 1.0 under Win 10 (64). We try to read
the USB output of a DMM 'UT61B'.
import usb.core
import usb.util
import usb.backend.libusb1
def Gosub():
2016-08-28 0:04 GMT-07:00 Steven D'Aprano <
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info>:
> On Sunday 28 August 2016 15:56, Juan Pablo Romero Méndez wrote:
>
> > 2016-08-27 21:30 GMT-07:00 Steve D'Aprano :
> [...]
> >> Now it is true that speaking in full generality, classes and types
> refer to
> >> dif
On 8/27/2016 7:28 PM, ROGER GRAYDON CHRISTMAN wrote:
> Your response is appreciated. I just thought I'd comment a little more on
> the
> script:
>
> Woman: I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!
>
> V: ehh... but you are dressed like one.
>
> W: They dressed me up like this!
>
> All: naah no we
On 08/27/2016 05:28 PM, ROGER GRAYDON CHRISTMAN wrote:
> They took a woman who originally, I think we might agree, was not a witch,
Umm no, she was actually a witch. Which makes the scene even funnier.
"Fair caught," she says at the end.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:28 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Sunday 28 August 2016 15:29, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> It might be a good way of thinking about points on a Cartesian plane,
>>> though. Rectangular and polar coordinates truly ar
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 08:34 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 8/26/2016 7:58 PM, ROGER GRAYDON CHRISTMAN wrote:
>> "If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck,... "
>>
>> so there is indeed precedence for this so-called 'duck typing'
>>
>>
>> but wouldn't it be more Pythonic to call this 'witch typing'?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:28 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>> On Sunday 28 August 2016 15:29, Chris Angelico wrote:
It might be a good way of thinking about points on a Cartesi
13 matches
Mail list logo
