Ciao,
I have this function:
def lockup_info(refer):
info = []
amb = CONN.db..find({"reference": refer}
for a in amb:
print a
How can I pass this value { "$exists": False } and tell python to not consider
it as a string?
var = '{ "$exists": Fals
Ive been trying to figure out the best outlining that emacs can give for
programs.
Outline-mode seems to be more for text than code
Outshine mode inspired by above+org-mode seemed promising in that it seems to
make org mode's wonderful TAB-behavior work for code.
But I couldn’t get it to work
So
On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 6:26:01 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Ive been trying to figure out the best outlining that emacs can give for
> programs.
Oops sorry! Wrong list!!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:52 PM, MG wrote:
> Ciao,
> I have this function:
>
>
> def lockup_info(refer):
> info = []
> amb = CONN.db..find({"reference": refer}
> for a in amb:
> print a
>
>
>
> How can I pass this value { "$exists": False } and tell pyt
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro
wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 7:22:42 PM UTC+12, Ian wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>>> In printf-style formats, you can specify the number of digits for an
>>> integer separately from the field widt
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:04 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 7:22:42 PM UTC+12, Ian wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
In printf-style formats, you can specify the number of d
On 07/11/2016 09:28 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:04 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
Er, what? I count *five* digits in "00123", not three.
You seem to be assuming that "precision" can only refer to digits after the
decimal place, but that's a dubious proposition.
I will readily ad
Hi ,
Does anyone use Python for developping applications that work with a touch
screen?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a physical
law is violated by compression of random binary data?
I only know that Shanon theorised it could not be done, but were there any
proof?
What is to say that you can not do it if the symbolic representation is riche
On 11 July 2016 at 20:52, wrote:
> What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a
> physical law is violated by compression of random binary data?
>
> I only know that Shanon theorised it could not be done, but were there any
> proof?
Compression relies on some items in
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:21:56 +0200, Jahn wrote:
> Hi ,
> Does anyone use Python for developping applications that work with a touch
> screen?
>
http://www.technolabsz.com/2011/08/how-to-make-touch-screen-user-interface.html
--
GNU/Linux user #557453
The cow died so I don't need your bull!
Den måndag 11 juli 2016 kl. 20:09:39 UTC+2 skrev Waffle:
> On 11 July 2016 at 20:52, wrote:
> > What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a
> > physical law is violated by compression of random binary data?
> >
> > I only know that Shanon theorised it could not be done
On 2016-07-11 18:52, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a physical
law is violated by compression of random binary data?
I only know that Shanon theorised it could not be done, but were there any
proof?
What is to say that you
Den måndag 11 juli 2016 kl. 20:24:37 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den måndag 11 juli 2016 kl. 20:09:39 UTC+2 skrev Waffle:
> > On 11 July 2016 at 20:52, wrote:
> > > What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a
> > > physical law is violated by compression of ran
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:04 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> Your example showed a 3-digit number being formatted with a requested
>> precision of 5 digits. The way this was done was by left-padding the
>> number with 0s until there were 5 digits,
>
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:52 am, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
> What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a
> physical law is violated by compression of random binary data?
The pigeon hole principle. If you have 100 pigeon holes, and 101 pigeons,
then clearly at least
On 7/11/2016 1:24 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 07/11/2016 09:28 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:04 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
Er, what? I count *five* digits in "00123", not three.
You seem to be assuming that "precision" can only refer to digits
after the
decimal place, but that's
On 2016-07-11 19:30, MRAB wrote:
On 2016-07-11 18:52, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a physical
law is violated by compression of random binary data?
I only know that Shanon theorised it could not be done, but were there an
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:52:08 -0700, jonas.thornvall wrote:
> What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a
> physical law is violated by compression of random binary data?
You can't create an invertable mapping between a set with 2^N elements
(e.g. the set of all N-bit bi
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> In any case, I think it an improvement to say that '0x00123' has a field
> width of 7 rather than a 'precision' of 5.
>
'{:#07x}'.format(0x123) # specifiy field width
> '0x00123'
"%#0.5x" % 0x123 # specify int precision
> '0x00123'
On 7/11/2016 2:09 PM, Joonas Liik wrote:
On 11 July 2016 at 20:52, wrote:
What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it
even a physical law is violated by compression of random binary
data?
Off-topic, but... It is unclear whether you mean 'random' in the
technical sense o
On 11.07.2016 19:21, Jahn wrote:
Does anyone use Python for developping applications that work with a touch
screen?
Yes.
You should probably specify the platform and the type of applications
that you're interested in.
Mobiles (Android, iOS, Sailfish OS)? Windows 10 Tablets? Ubuntu Touc
On 07/11/2016 01:27 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> In any case, I think it an improvement to say that '0x00123' has a field
>> width of 7 rather than a 'precision' of 5.
>>
> '{:#07x}'.format(0x123) # specifiy field width
>> '0x00123'
> "%#0
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 16:06, Michael Torrie wrote:
> I'm not sure I've ever seen a negative hex number in the wild. Usually
> when I view a number in hex I am wanting the raw representation. -0x123
> with a width of 7 would be 0xFFEDD
There's nothing "raw" about python int objects. To get what
Actually this was not your last chance! I am offering one spare regular
rate student ticket (120,-). Please contact me if interested.
Cheers,
Moritz
On 07/07/2016 09:35 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> We will be switching to the on-desk rates for tickets tomorrow, so
> today is your last chance to get
On 7/11/2016 3:27 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
In any case, I think it an improvement to say that '0x00123' has a field
width of 7 rather than a 'precision' of 5.
'{:#07x}'.format(0x123) # specifiy field width
'0x00123'
"%#0.5x" % 0x123 # speci
Ethan Furman writes:
> I will readily admit to not having a maths degree, and so of course to
> me saying the integer 123 has a precision of 5, 10, or 99 digits seems
> like hogwash to me.
Precision is not a property of the number. It is a property of the
*representation* of that number.
The re
On 07/11/2016 01:56 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Precision is not a property of the number. It is a property of the
*representation* of that number.
The representation “1×10²” has a precision of one digit.
The representation “100” has a precision of three digits.
The representation “00100” has a preci
Jahn wrote:
> Hi ,
> Does anyone use Python for developping applications that work with a
> touch screen?
You should take a look at Kivy: https://kivy.org/
A+
L.Pointal.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Precision is not a property of the number. It is a property of the
> *representation* of that number.
>
> The representation “1×10²” has a precision of one digit.
> The representation “100” has a precision of three digits.
> The representation “
On 07/11/2016 02:51 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Precision is not a property of the number. It is a property of the
*representation* of that number.
The representation “1×10²” has a precision of one digit.
The representation “100” has a precisio
On 07/11/2016 03:17 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
So, so far there is no explanation of why leading zeroes make a number
more precise.
An example of what I mean:
174 with a precision of 3 tells us that the tenths place could be any of
0-9, or, put another way, the actual number could be anywhere b
Ben Finney writes:
> Ethan Furman writes:
>
>> I will readily admit to not having a maths degree, and so of course to
>> me saying the integer 123 has a precision of 5, 10, or 99 digits seems
>> like hogwash to me.
>
> Precision is not a property of the number. It is a property of the
> *represe
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:51:23 +1000
Chris Angelico wrote:
[snip]
>
> Yep. Precision is also a property of a measurement, the same
> way that a unit is. If I pace out the length of the main
> corridor in my house, I might come up with a result of thirty
> meters. The number is "30"; the unit is "m
I seem to remember Guido stating once that a design principle of
the new formatting system was for the part after the colon to
be the same as what you would put in an equivalent %-format,
to make it easy for people to switch between them.
If that principle still stands, then this would seem to be
Ethan Furman wrote:
I will readily admit to not having a maths degree, and so of course to
me saying the integer 123 has a precision of 5, 10, or 99 digits seems
like hogwash to me.
Seems to me insisting that the number after the dot be
called "precision" in all cases is imposing a foolish
con
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Jan Coombs
wrote:
> Thees all look good, but you may get into trouble if you trust a
> PC with them!
>
> If the language/PC uses floating point representation then it
> will assign a fixed number of bits for the fractional part, and
> this will be left aligned in a
On 07/11/2016 04:47 PM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
I will readily admit to not having a maths degree, and so of course to
me saying the integer 123 has a precision of 5, 10, or 99 digits seems
like hogwash to me.
Seems to me insisting that the number after the dot be
called "pr
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, 10:56 AM wrote:
> What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a
> physical law is violated by compression of random binary data?
>
If you get lucky, you might be able to achieve very good compression.
> http://dilbert.com/strip/2001-10-25
Or are y
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Gregory Ewing
wrote:
> Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>> I will readily admit to not having a maths degree, and so of course to me
>> saying the integer 123 has a precision of 5, 10, or 99 digits seems like
>> hogwash to me.
>
>
> Seems to me insisting that the number afte
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> This is why it's important to be able to record precisions of
>> arbitrary numbers. If I then measure the width of this corridor with a
>> laser, I could get an extremely precise answer - say, 2,147
>> millimeters, with a precision of four si
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 5:52:27 AM UTC+12, jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote:
> What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a
> physical law is violated by compression of random binary data?
Try compressing already-compressed data.
Does that answer your question?
--
http
Script grabs some image data and runs imagemagick on it to extract some
chinese. Then tesseract OCR to get the actual unicode.
I then need to get it translated which also works and then display in
XTerm using cat.
I could cat << named_pipe but I was wondering if this was the only way?
Could I j
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 04:38 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> In what way do the leading zeroes in "00123" add to the precision of
> the number? 00123 is the same quantity as 123 and represents no more
> precise a measurement.
You guys... next you're going to tell me that 1.23 and 1.2300 are the same
quantit
Ethan Furman writes:
> On 07/11/2016 01:56 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > Precision is not a property of the number. It is a property of the
> > *representation* of that number.
> >
> > The representation “1×10²” has a precision of one digit.
> > The representation “100” has a precision of three dig
On 7/11/2016 5:51 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
This is why it's important to be able to record precisions of
arbitrary numbers. If I then measure the width of this corridor with a
laser, I could get an extremely precise answer - say, 2,147
millimeters, with a precision of four significant digits, a
On 7/11/2016 6:17 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 07/11/2016 02:51 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
This is why it's important to be able to record precisions of
arbitrary numbers. If I then measure the width of this corridor with a
laser, I could get an extremely precise answer - say, 2,147
millimeters,
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:51 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> say, 2,147
> millimeters, with a precision of four significant digits
How do you represent 1 mm to a precision of four significant digits, in such
a way that it is distinguished from 1 mm to one significant digit, and 1 mm
to a precision of f
"Jahn" writes:
> Does anyone use Python for developping applications that work with a
> touch screen?
I've done it on a system where the touch screen events were treated the
same way as mouse events. Coding works out about the same way.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:51 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> say, 2,147
>> millimeters, with a precision of four significant digits
>
>
> How do you represent 1 mm to a precision of four significant digits, in such
> a way that it is distinguis
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.6 release
team, I'm happy to announce the availability of Python 3.6.0a3.
3.6.0a3 is the third of four planned alpha releases of Python 3.6,
the next major release of Python. During the alpha phase, Python 3.6
remains under heavy devel
On Tuesday 12 July 2016 08:17, Ethan Furman wrote:
> So, so far there is no explanation of why leading zeroes make a number
> more precise.
Obviously it doesn't, just as trailing zeroes doesn't make a number more
precise. Precision in the sense used by scientists is a property of how the
measu
On Tuesday 12 July 2016 16:27, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 July 2016 13:20, Veek. M wrote:
>
>> Script grabs some image data and runs imagemagick on it to extract some
>> chinese. Then tesseract OCR to get the actual unicode.
>>
>> I then need to get it translated which also works and
On Tuesday 12 July 2016 13:20, Veek. M wrote:
> Script grabs some image data and runs imagemagick on it to extract some
> chinese. Then tesseract OCR to get the actual unicode.
>
> I then need to get it translated which also works and then display in
> XTerm using cat.
Why not just print it? Why
54 matches
Mail list logo
