Thanks your way makes more sense indeed.
In the example they create and access I think I just got lost in their example.
Sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lawrence D’Oliveiro :
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 10:26:03 AM UTC+12, Gregory Ewing wrote:
>
>> If you're building something the size of a pyramid, that could
>> add up to quite a lot of error.
>
> Particularly since so many of their neighbours had worked out how to
> do much better than that, t
Am 20.06.16 um 00:15 schrieb Michael Torrie:
On 06/19/2016 03:21 PM, Quivis wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:26:36 -0400, Joel Goldstick wrote:
that it is on every linux system
No, it isn't! I can be *installed* on every Linux system, but that a
whole other can of worms.
True vim is not. But
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 10:45:08 AM UTC+12, Gregory Ewing wrote:
>
> Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> But not vi/vim. It only lets you place your cursor *on* a character, not
>> *in-between* characters.
>
> That's because the terminals it was designed to work on
> didn't have any way of display
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 4:31:00 PM UTC+12, Phil Boutros wrote:
>
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>> This is how I write x≠y from scratch:
>
>
> To wrap this back full circle, here's how it's done on vim:
>
> Ctrl-K, =, ! (last two steps interchangeable). Done. Result: ≠
Standard Linux
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 7:32:54 PM UTC+12, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Width/height ratio of the pyramid of Cheops was so close to π/2 that UFO
> enthusiasts were convinced alien technology was used in the construction
> of the pyramids.
They were also able to get the bases of the pyramids horizo
On Monday, 20 June 2016 16:19:31 UTC+10, Peter Otten wrote:
> Sayth Renshaw wrote:
>
> > Afternoon
> >
> > Wondering has anyone much experience with lxml specifically objectify?
> >
> > When I pick up a file with lxml and use objectify dumping root works as
> > expected actually better its quit
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 07:23:15 -0600, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 06/19/2016 01:34 AM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 7:13:26 PM UTC+12, Christian Gollwitzer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 19.06.16 um 02:12 schrieb Lawrence D’Oliveiro:
>>>
But not vi/vim. It only lets you place
On Monday 20 June 2016 17:57, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 4:31:00 PM UTC+12, Phil Boutros wrote:
>>
>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>>
>>> This is how I write x≠y from scratch:
>>
>>
>> To wrap this back full circle, here's how it's done on vim:
>>
>> Ctrl-K, =, ! (l
On 19/06/2016 18:16, Joel Goldstick wrote:
People who understand global variables generally avoid using them at
all costs.
Then perhaps they don't understand that in Python, top-level functions,
classes and imports are also globals.
--
Bartc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
Op 19-06-16 om 23:20 schreef BartC:
> On 19/06/2016 15:35, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 12-06-16 om 23:10 schreef BartC:
>>> On 12/06/2016 20:25, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Just as here there is no link between x
and y:
x = 12
y = x
>>>
>>> (And that's a good illustratio
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:21 pm, BartC wrote:
> On 19/06/2016 18:16, Joel Goldstick wrote:
>
>> People who understand global variables generally avoid using them at
>> all costs.
>
> Then perhaps they don't understand that in Python, top-level functions,
> classes and imports are also globals.
But
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:14 pm, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 19-06-16 om 23:20 schreef BartC:
>> On 19/06/2016 15:35, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>> Op 12-06-16 om 23:10 schreef BartC:
On 12/06/2016 20:25, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> Just as here there is no link between x
> and y:
>
>
Op 20-06-16 om 14:15 schreef Steven D'Aprano:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:14 pm, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>> Op 19-06-16 om 23:20 schreef BartC:
>>> On 19/06/2016 15:35, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 12-06-16 om 23:10 schreef BartC:
> On 12/06/2016 20:25, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>> Just as here t
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016, at 18:44, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> > But not vi/vim. It only lets you place your cursor *on* a character, not
> > *in-between* characters.
>
> That's because the terminals it was designed to work on
> didn't have any way of displaying a cursor betwe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016, at 08:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Bart didn't say anyone had defended it. He made an observation:
>
> "that's a good illustration of why 'y' isn't a name reference to 'x'"
>
> which is factually correct. And this does refer to the "ducks limp"
> thread.
Except it doesn't.
We all know that good food, drinks and music are essential for a
perfect EuroPython conference and so we’ve arranged a nice dinner with
local food and a party for Tuesday evening (July 19th).
*** EuroPython Conference Dinner and Party ***
https://ep2016.europython.eu/en/even
Am 20.06.16 um 15:26 schrieb Random832:
The point is that in vim you
can't position the normal-mode cursor in such a way that inserted
characters are inserted at the end of the line.
But you can press i at the end of the line, then arrow-right, which
positions the cursor over the empty space a
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 7:06:57 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 20.06.16 um 15:26 schrieb Random832:
> > The point is that in vim you
> > can't position the normal-mode cursor in such a way that inserted
> > characters are inserted at the end of the line.
>
> But you can press i
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 11:34:36 AM UTC+5:30, Random832 wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016, at 01:03, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > > Ctrl-K, =, ! (last two steps interchangeable). Done. Result: ≠
> >
> > Are these 'shortcuts' parameterizable?
>
> They originate from RFC 1345, with the extension that
Am 20.06.16 um 15:48 schrieb Rustom Mody:
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 7:06:57 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 20.06.16 um 15:26 schrieb Random832:
The point is that in vim you
can't position the normal-mode cursor in such a way that inserted
characters are inserted at the end of the
On 2016-06-20, Phil Boutros wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>> Quote:
>>
>> "Why do we have to write x!=y then argue about the status of x<>y when we
>> can simply write x≠y?"
>>
>> "Simply"?
>>
>> This is how I write x≠y from scratch:
>
>
> To wrap this back full circle, here's how it's d
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:29 pm, Random832 wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016, at 08:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Bart didn't say anyone had defended it. He made an observation:
>>
>> "that's a good illustration of why 'y' isn't a name reference to 'x'"
>>
>> which is factually correct. And this does r
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:23 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-06-20, Phil Boutros wrote:
[...]
>> Ctrl-K, =, ! (last two steps interchangeable). Done. Result: ≠
>
> On any non-broken X11 system it's: = /
Nope, doesn't work for me. I guess I've got a "broken" X11 system.
Oh, I did learn one
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 8:30:25 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:23 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> > On 2016-06-20, Phil Boutros wrote:
> [...]
> >> Ctrl-K, =, ! (last two steps interchangeable). Done. Result: ≠
> >
> > On any non-broken X11 system it's: = /
>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> There's a difference though. Nobody has tried to legislate the value of pi to
> match your casual reference to "about 1900 square feet", but there's been at
> least one serious attempt to legislate the value of pi to match the implied
> va
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I'm not aware of any other such legislative attempts. Snopes records
> one that allegedly occurred in Indiana but dismisses the claim as
> false.
s/Indiana/Alabama
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
hi. I'm new to python and trying to work with simple letter strings and the
print command in my first python lessons. However, in my sublime text editor
nothing but the time it takes to complete the build shows up, and sometimes not
even that updates.
How can I configure sublime text so that it
On 2016-06-19, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> I feel a new phrase coming on: “good enough for Bible work”!
>
> I understand there's a passage in the Bible somewhere that
> uses a 1 significant digit approximation to pi...
A lot of the time, 3 is a good-enough approximation
On 2016-06-20, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> One of the most underrated yet critical functions of government is
> to standardise weights and measures, and that function evolved very
> slowly over time. I doubt that the Egyptian Pharoahs cared about it,
Oh, I bet they did. How you measure things affe
Gregory Ewing :
> Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> I feel a new phrase coming on: “good enough for Bible work”!
>
> I understand there's a passage in the Bible somewhere that
> uses a 1 significant digit approximation to pi...
Yes:
And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 01:01:21 -0700, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 7:32:54 PM UTC+12, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>> Width/height ratio of the pyramid of Cheops was so close to π/2 that UFO
>> enthusiasts were convinced alien technology was used in the construction
>> of the
Wildman :
> As you can see, a stone had to be cut, transported and put in place
> every 6 minutes 24 hours a day for 23 years. And if the stone count
> was actually 2.4 million, the time would be reduced to 5 minutes per
> stone. All I can say is wow!
It probably means mostly that the Nile produc
Sorry. Only works with text files. But my point is still valid.
***
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain privileged
information or confidential information or both. If you are not the intended
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:01 am, Harrison Chudleigh wrote:
> Sorry. Only works with text files. But my point is still valid.
What point?
Without context, how are we supposed to know what you're talking about?
We're not mind-readers you know.
--
Steven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
35 matches
Mail list logo
