Thanks everybody for your answers. I really appreciate your answers and
I do have a few things to investigate later this summer (after finishing
my current "excursion" into Java, and trying to learn KDB/Q).
= jem
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11-6-2016 13:37, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> first off, let me admit that I have a hard time comprehensively wrapping
> my head around timezones. Everything around them is much more
> complicated than it seems, IMO.
They might not seem complicated, but actually they are. Mindboggling
>
> On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 10:04:09 PM UTC+8, Michael Selik wrote:
> > You'll need to explain the problem in more detail. Instead of talking
> about operators and columns, what is the actual, real-world problem?
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 2:21 AM meInvent bbird wrote:
> there are six operato
On 10/06/2016 23:31, alex wright wrote:
I find shlex.split to be most useful to make my arguments a list in these
cases.
On Jun 9, 2016 3:28 PM, "MRAB" wrote:
On 2016-06-09 19:58, Peter Otten wrote:
Nev wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I tried something like this in python code:
from sub
Thanks to everyone for your replies. I see my script was as horrific as I
feared, but I read all the responses and made a few changes. I'm not 100% sold
on not checking types, but took it out, because it made sense that other
programmers might want to use some custom type with my functions for
For those who don't want to have to wade through comments, here is a version
without so many comments:
# For Python 3.x
# This script creates multiple numbered empty folders
# in the desired location. To change the folder names
# or location, edit function get_default_options.
import datetime
im
Look into docstrings. They will make your code much more readable to a
Python reader.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 2:16 PM mad scientist jr
wrote:
> For those who don't want to have to wade through comments, here is a
> version without so many comments:
>
> # For Python 3.x
> # This script creates mul
On 2016-06-11 18:59, mad scientist jr wrote:
Thanks to everyone for your replies. I see my script was as horrific as I
feared, but I read all the responses and made a few changes. I'm not 100% sold
on not checking types, but took it out, because it made sense that other
programmers might wan
Hi there,
first off, let me admit that I have a hard time comprehensively wrapping
my head around timezones. Everything around them is much more
complicated than it seems, IMO. That said, I'm trying to do things the
"right" way and stumbled upon some weird issue which I can't explain.
I'm unsure w
Hi to all.
I have the following file named Solver.py:
*
from Test import some_function, my_print
from Test import test_var
some_function()
my_print()
print(test_var)
*
and I have the following Test.py:
**
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 19:44, Marcin Rak wrote:
> So my question is, how the heck is it possible that I get 5 as the last
> value printed? the global test_var (global to Test.py) I set to 44 when I
> ran some_function()??? does anyone have a clue they could throw my way?
Importing a variable fr
On 2016-06-12 00:50, Random832 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 19:44, Marcin Rak wrote:
So my question is, how the heck is it possible that I get 5 as the last
value printed? the global test_var (global to Test.py) I set to 44 when I
ran some_function()??? does anyone have a clue they could thr
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 18:51:11 UTC-5, Random832 wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 19:44, Marcin Rak wrote:
> > So my question is, how the heck is it possible that I get 5 as the last
> > value printed? the global test_var (global to Test.py) I set to 44 when I
> > ran some_function()??? does
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 19:09:29 UTC-5, MRAB wrote:
> On 2016-06-12 00:50, Random832 wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 19:44, Marcin Rak wrote:
> >> So my question is, how the heck is it possible that I get 5 as the last
> >> value printed? the global test_var (global to Test.py) I set to 44 w
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 20:09, MRAB wrote:
> Not true. Importing doesn't copy the value.
>
> Importing a name creates a new name in the local scope that refers to
> the same object that the imported name referred to.
Yes, the value of a variable is a reference to an object. Can we not
have anot
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 20:12, Marcin Rak wrote:
> What about variables that are user defined classes? Are they referenced
> or copied?
It will reference the same object, but if the variable is reassigned in
the original module it will still not update the imported variable.
--
https://mail.pyt
https://gist.github.com/hoyeunglee/3fea29ed4aadb5dbc11c41f9a36070dc
i discover my code can not record the path
because i do recursive call at the end of function
however, i want to do full combination at the end of function before calling
recursive call,
for seeing the result path, choose call
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:26 am, Random832 wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 20:09, MRAB wrote:
>> Not true. Importing doesn't copy the value.
>>
>> Importing a name creates a new name in the local scope that refers to
>> the same object that the imported name referred to.
MRAB is correct here.
>
On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 8:13:50 PM UTC-4, Marcin Rak wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 June 2016 19:09:29 UTC-5, MRAB wrote:
> > On 2016-06-12 00:50, Random832 wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 19:44, Marcin Rak wrote:
> > >> So my question is, how the heck is it possible that I get 5 as the last
On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 11:38:33 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:26 am, Random832 wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 20:09, MRAB wrote:
> >> Not true. Importing doesn't copy the value.
> >>
> >> Importing a name creates a new name in the local scope that refers
https://gist.github.com/hoyeunglee/350ac2dd496f7c1c95a428f847e6f2b1
then can not run deep 3 in python sagecloud
>>> mresult = DFS(b, 3, 3, mylist, path)
('deep=', 3)
({'11': 1, '10': 1, '00': 0, '01': 1}, {'11': 1, '10': 0, '00': 0, '01': 0})
({'11': 1, '10': 1, '00': 0, '01': 1}, {'11': 1, '10':
i forget why i do combination of 2 operators
now i change not to use combination of 2 operators
https://gist.github.com/hoyeunglee/58df4c41a63a2f37e153cbdbc03c16bf
i run
mresult = DFS(b, 2, 2, mylist, path)
it do not have deep 2 and deep 1 in the path
they only separated in the list
however
22 matches
Mail list logo
