Steven D'Aprano writes:
> It's very interesting that you ignore the two hardest parts of the process:
> (1) Producing the patch in the first place.
> (2) Convincing those with appropriate commit rights to accept the patch.
2 is often harder than 1. Or consider the case when you report an
obvious
Hi,
How we can send mail with attachment in Python? Is it any prerequisite for it?
Thanks,
Kevin Peterson
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Kevin Peterson wrote:
> How we can send mail with attachment in Python? Is it any prerequisite for it?
You could use your favourite search engine to look this up. Or you
could poke around with the Python standard library and see if anything
looks promising:
https
On 07/19/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:07:14 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
>> def main():
>> name= input('Enter your full name: ')
>> split=name.split()
>> Full_name=split[2],split[0], split[1]
>> print(Full_name[2],',', Full_name[0], Full
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 07/19/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:07:14 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> def main():
>>> name= input('Enter your full name: ')
>>> split=name.split()
>>> Full_name=split[2],split[
On 07/19/2015 06:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 20/07/2015 00:23, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> No use replying anymore. You make a caricature of what I am saying and
>> put words in my mouth I never said. Just stay in your cosy ivory
>> tower. But please do not pretend that you are open for discussi
On Monday 20 July 2015 13:30, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:35 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting
>>> to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-p
Mark Lawrence writes:
> On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> ...
>> Babies want clean diapers. So babies have to change diapers
>> themselves?
>>
>
> That has to be the worst analogy I've ever read. We are discussing
> backportin
Ian Kelly writes:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
Of c
On 7/19/2015 9:20 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
Search your logs for https://bugs.python.org/issue17094
http://bugs.python.org/issue5315
I was most frustrated by the first case --
> the patch was (informally) rejected
By 'the patch', I presume you mean current-frames-cleanup.patch
by Stefan Rin
Rick Johnson writes:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 12:54:34 AM UTC-5, dieter wrote:
>> From my point of view: if you want help with fixing bugs,
>> you must ensure that there is a high probability that
>> those contributions really find their way into the main
>> development lines. As I understan
Mark Lawrence writes:
> On 19/07/2015 18:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 18:38 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> ...
>> You think so? I think that a lot of people who are using 2.7 would
>> like to have the fixes. They know how to use Python, but they would
>> not now how to implem
On 07/19/2015 11:33 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> For the most part,
> it's been good to hear from Cecil (there have been a few snarky posts)
> as he has learned python and really run with it. I don't understand
> where your apparent frustration with Cecil is coming from.
Come to think of it, I ca
Rick Johnson writes:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 1:44:25 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
>> No, it's simply that nobody can force volunteers to back
>> port something when they're just not interested in doing
>> the work, for whatever reason. Hence my statement above,
>> of which you have
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
