Albert-Jan Roskam schrieb am 06.12.2014 um 21:28:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
>> https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
>
> Interesting, but it is not clear to me when you would use jitpy instead
> of pypy.
I thin
I am trying to login to enable mode on a Cisco ASA with this script. I can’t
seem to get the enable mode to work. Can anyone help. Does anyone know of a
good doc for exscript lib.
Thank you
Ed
from Exscript.util.start import quickstart
from Exscript.util.file import get_hosts_from_fil
garage/
|- __init__.py
|- cars/
|- __init__.py
|- hummer.py
tests/
|- test_cars.py
at the top of test_cars.py, there is this:
from garage.cars import hummer
pytest is on this import statement, so i guess it's incorrect.
what should it be?
if i open a python repl
At the beginning of this thread, Ian Kelly said:
Not with defaultdict, but you can subclass dict and provide a
__missing__ method directly
To emphasize, you don't need to subclass "defaultdict" -- you need only subclass
"dict" itself:
class MyDict(dict):
def __missing__(self, key):
Hello everyone,
I'm currently in the process of self-study journey, so I have some questions
arisen from time to time.
Today I would like to talk about iterables and iterators,(ask for your help
actually ^_^).
Before I'll continue, just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that I
di
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Ivan Evstegneev wrote:
> (quoting from the book)
> Because this code uses iter and next, it works on any type of iterable. Note
> that there
> is no reason to catch the StopIteration raised by the next(it) inside the
> comprehension
> here when any one of the argume
Hello fellow pythoneers,
First some background: I am implementing an XMPP client library in
asyncio. XMPP uses (START-)TLS. However, the native SSL support of
Python is rather restricted: We cannot hook into the certificate
validation process (it is PKI-all-or-nothing) at all, in addition many
of
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 11:06 AM CET Stefan Behnel wrote:
>Albert-Jan Roskam schrieb am 06.12.2014 um 21:28:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
>> https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
>>
>> I
My system:win7+python3.4 .
I have installed Crypto and Paramiko .
C:\Windows\system32>pip3.4 install Crypto
Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): Crypto in
d:\python34\
lib\site-packages
Cleaning up...
C:\Windows\system32>pip3.4 install Paramiko
Requ
On 05/12/14 23:17, wesleiram...@gmail.com wrote:
m'giu vous êtès nom souris, pseudo nom cha'rs out oiu êtès, i'ret egop c'hâse
I have not idea what that means, but I am sure it would be interesting
if I knew French (or whatever it is).
Sturla
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
Hello,
When I have worked in Python shell (IDLE) I found this issue:
>>>x = ([1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6])
>>>L = []
>>>for I in x:
L.extend(i)
>>>L
[1,2,3,4,5,6]
But when I try to make comprehension using above expression, I get this:
>>>x = ([1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6])
>>>L = []
>>> [L.extend
On 12/07, Ivan Evstegneev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I have worked in Python shell (IDLE) I found this issue:
>
> >>>x = ([1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6])
> >>>L = []
> >>>for I in x:
> L.extend(i)
>
> >>>L
> [1,2,3,4,5,6]
>
> But when I try to make comprehension using above expression, I get this:
>
>
Hi Shiyao,
Now I see, that it was kind of dumb question...
x = ([1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6])
L = []
>>>[L.extend(i) for i in x]
[None, None, None]
BUT when I check L itself I'll see this one
>>>L
[1,2,3,5,6]
Ok. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Shiyao Ma [mailto:i...@introo.me]
S
Awesome Ned,
Believe it or not, but I was browsing web for the answer about a half an
hour ago.
Guess what? I found your web page with the explanations you provided there.
)))
Finally, I was ready to send this question to you directly, cause I didn't
know that you subscribed to this mailing lis
New to Python, so please go easy.
I've a list of users, who have different profiles on different computers. How
to tackle this through lists and dictionaries? Here is the data example. More
interested in learning how to declare this structure and add/delete/extract
values from whatever data stru
On 12/05/2014 11:50 PM, sam pendleton wrote:
garage/
|- __init__.py
|- cars/
|- __init__.py
|- hummer.py
tests/
|- test_cars.py
at the top of test_cars.py, there is this:
from garage.cars import hummer
pytest is on this import statement, so i guess it's inc
On 12/05/2014 03:51 PM, John J Posner wrote:
At the beginning of this thread, Ian Kelly said:
Since this clearly is intended to be part of the earlier thread, please
make it so by using reply-list or whatever equivalent your email program
has.
Not with defaultdict, but you can subcla
On Dec 07 at 11:31 -0500, Dave Angel wrote:
> Since this clearly is intended to be part of the earlier thread, please make
> it so by using reply-list or whatever equivalent your email program has.
Kinda OT. But interested what's the difference between reply-list and to.
In addition, based on what
On 12/07/2014 11:18 AM, Wacky wrote:
New to Python, so please go easy.
I've a list of users, who have different profiles on different computers. How
to tackle this through lists and dictionaries? Here is the data example. More
interested in learning how to declare this structure and add/delete/
Shiyao Ma writes:
> On Dec 07 at 11:31 -0500, Dave Angel wrote:
> > Since this clearly is intended to be part of the earlier thread,
> > please make it so by using reply-list or whatever equivalent your
> > email program has.
>
> Kinda OT. But interested what's the difference between reply-list a
On 12/07/2014 11:43 AM, Shiyao Ma wrote:
On Dec 07 at 11:31 -0500, Dave Angel wrote:
Since this clearly is intended to be part of the earlier thread, please make
it so by using reply-list or whatever equivalent your email program has.
Kinda OT. But interested what's the difference between repl
On 07/12/2014 15:05, Sturla Molden wrote:
On 05/12/14 23:17, wesleiram...@gmail.com wrote:
m'giu vous êtès nom souris, pseudo nom cha'rs out oiu êtès, i'ret egop
c'hâse
I have not idea what that means, but I am sure it would be interesting
if I knew French (or whatever it is).
Please be ca
On Dec 7, 2014 9:33 AM, "Dave Angel" wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2014 03:51 PM, John J Posner wrote:
>>
>> At the beginning of this thread, Ian Kelly said:
>
>
> Since this clearly is intended to be part of the earlier thread, please
make it so by using reply-list or whatever equivalent your email program
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> 3. The only operation supported on iterators is next(). You cannot start
> them over, you cannot ask if there will be more values, you cannot find out
> how many values there will be, you can't ask what the last value was, etc.
> By supporti
On Dec 7, 2014 8:31 AM, "Ned Batchelder" wrote:
> NOTE: THIS EXAMPLE IS HORRIBLE. This code is crazy-confusing, and should
never have been used as an example of iteration. It layers at least three
iterations on top of each other, making it very difficult to see what is
going on. It uses "while i
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2014 8:31 AM, "Ned Batchelder" wrote:
>> NOTE: THIS EXAMPLE IS HORRIBLE. This code is crazy-confusing, and should
>> never have been used as an example of iteration. It layers at least three
>> iterations on top of each other, making i
On 12/5/2014 3:51 PM, John J Posner wrote:
The defaultdict documentation is confusing on this point. A *long* time
ago, I filed Bug 9536 to improve the doc, but the fix hasn't bubbled to
the surface yet.
Untrue. Your patch 'bubbled to the surface' and got provisionally
rejected in 5 hours an
On 12/7/2014 10:28 AM, Ivan Evstegneev wrote:
Hi Shiyao,
Now I see, that it was kind of dumb question...
x = ([1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6])
L = []
[L.extend(i) for i in x]
[None, None, None]
Using a list comprehension for the expression side-effect, when you do
not actually want the list produc
A new version of the Python module which wraps GnuPG has been
released.
What Changed?
=
This is an enhancement and bug-fix release, but the bug-fixes
include some security improvements, so all users are encouraged
to upgrade. See the project website [1] for more information.
Brief sum
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Dec 7, 2014 8:31 AM, "Ned Batchelder" wrote:
>>> NOTE: THIS EXAMPLE IS HORRIBLE. This code is crazy-confusing, and
>>> should never have been used as an example of iteration. It layers at
>>> least three iterations o
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:18:03 -0800, Wacky wrote:
> New to Python, so please go easy.
> I've a list of users, who have different profiles .
How are you getting on with this assignment / homework?
I have a solution I could post, but I thought I'd wait to see what your
solution was first.
Her
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> How would we re-write this to work in the future Python 3.7? Unless I have
> missed something, I think we could write it like this:
>
> def myzip37(*args):
> iters = list(map(iter, args))
> while iters:
> try:
>
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:01:26 -0500, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 12/07/2014 11:18 AM, Wacky wrote:
>> I've a list of users
> I haven't run this through the Python, so please forgive any typos.
> users = [
> mess = {
users is redundant, as it's mess.keys()
maintaining a separate list
Chris Angelico wrote:
> > I'm actually glad PEP 479 will break this kind of code. Gives a good
> > excuse for rewriting it to be more readable.
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> What kind of code is that? Short, simple, Pythonic and elegant? :-)
>
> Here's the code again, with indentation fixed:
>
>
>
In article ,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> > How would we re-write this to work in the future Python 3.7? Unless I have
> > missed something, I think we could write it like this:
> >
> > def myzip37(*args):
> > iters = list(map(iter, arg
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Ugh. When I see "while foo", my brain says, "OK, you're about to see a
> loop which is controlled by the value of foo being changed inside the
> loop". That's not at all what's happening here, so my brain runs into a
> wall.
I agree, with the
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Although, to be honest, I'm wondering if this is more straight-forward
> (also not tested):
>
> def myzip37(*args):
> if not args:
> return
> iters = list(map(iter, args))
Yes, I prefer this too. It's explicit and clear that pass
On 12/7/2014 7:12 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
I'm actually glad PEP 479 will break this kind of code. Gives a good
excuse for rewriting it to be more readable.
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
What kind of code is that? Short, simple, Pythonic and elegant? :-)
Here's the code again, wi
In article ,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Next problem, what the heck is "res"? We're not back in the punch-card
> > days. We don't have to abbreviate variable names to save columns.
> > Variable names are supposed to describe what they hold, and thus help
> > you understand the code. I have no
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
>> I take it as "result", which makes plenty of sense to me.
>
> OK, so spell it out. Three more keystrokes (well, plus another three
> when you use it on the next line). And one of them is a vowel; they
> don't even cost much. The next guy who
On 12/7/14 7:12 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
I'm actually glad PEP 479 will break this kind of code. Gives a good
excuse for rewriting it to be more readable.
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
What kind of code is that? Short, simple, Pythonic and elegant? :-)
Here's the code again, with
My understanding from talking to different people is that many do use
tabs (instead of spaces) for indentation in their code.
My question is to them (because I want to use tabs too) is: how do you
maintain a line-length of 79 characters?
E.g. scenario: The tab setting in your editor could be 2 or
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Aahan Krish wrote:
> My question is to them (because I want to use tabs too) is: how do you
> maintain a line-length of 79 characters?
>
> E.g. scenario: The tab setting in your editor could be 2 or 4, and in
> other developer's browser it could be 8. The code will
One reason why you would want max length 79 is because of working with
terminals. Maybe ssh to you server and check how many spaces are consumed
by a tab? In my boxes, it is usually 1 tab = 8 spaces. So perhaps just
use that setting in your editor?
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Aahan Krish
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Aahan Krish wrote:
> > My question is to them (because I want to use tabs too) is: how do you
> > maintain a line-length of 79 characters?
> >
> > E.g. scenario: The tab setting in your editor could be 2 or
On 2014-12-08 01:00, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
I take it as "result", which makes plenty of sense to me.
OK, so spell it out. Three more keystrokes (well, plus another three
when you use it on the next line). And one of them is a vowel; they
don
On 12/7/14 9:15 PM, Aahan Krish wrote:
My understanding from talking to different people is that many do use
tabs (instead of spaces) for indentation in their code.
My question is to them (because I want to use tabs too) is: how do you
maintain a line-length of 79 characters?
E.g. scenario: The
Hi Ned,
> I'm curious why you care about the "79 characters" part of PEP8 if you don't
> care about the "use spaces" part of PEP8.
It's just that I don't like arbitrary rules. IMHO, spaces aren't
"better than" tabs, and people should refrain from saying that. Both
have their fair bit of disadvan
jtan writes:
> One reason why you would want max length 79 is because of working with
> terminals.
That reason is decreasingly relevant as terminals become virtual, in a
display window that can be much larger if we choose.
Much more relevant is the ability to have two or even three code windows
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Aahan Krish wrote:
> As for why I care the "79 chars" part of PEP 8:
>
> - Coding in terminals and VIM with multiple windows open.
Then measure your width with tabs set to 8 spaces, and nothing else
matters. Otherwise, go back to your previous statement about avoid
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> But regardless of display technology, the biggest reason to stick to a
> limit like 80 or less is: reader technology. The ability for humans to
> comprehend long lines of text is poor, and there *is* a cognitive point
> beyond which it's not help
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Aahan Krish wrote:
> > My question is to them (because I want to use tabs too) is: how do you
> > maintain a line-length of 79 characters?
> >
> > E.g. scenario: The tab setting in your editor could be 2 or 4, and in
> > other developer's
Aahan Krish writes:
> It's just that I don't like arbitrary rules. IMHO, spaces aren't
> "better than" tabs, and people should refrain from saying that.
Simplicity has value.
The rule “use four spaces for indentation” is simple to stick to, and
simple to obtain sane display results by default.
Chris Angelico writes:
> Sure, a 500-character line is less readable than a 75-character line.
So we agree that merely being able to *display* more text on a line is
not a reason to have arbitrarily-long lines of code. Good!
> But how much difference is there between 79 and, say, 90? I'd say
>
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I do not believe that good code must be obviously right. It's okay for code
to be subtly right.
If you write code as subtly as you can, you're not
subtle enough to debug it...
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Terry Reedy wrote:
However, this 'beautiful' code has a trap. If one gets rid of the
seemingly unneeded temporary list res by telescoping the last two lines
into a bit too much into
yield tuple(next(i) for i in iters)
we now have an infinite generator, because tuple() swallows th
Cython and number it is...
they definitely rule!
But of course I am also interfacing my python code (with all the
structuring and UI and object orientation) with some sse and fortran.
if u can get a grip of programming fortran/sse, they work too
On 12/7/14, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 07/12/2014
On 12/7/2014 11:44 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Much more relevant is the ability to have two or even three code windows
side-by-side, for comparison during a merge operation. For this purpose,
a 75–80 column limit is a great help.
Or Idle Shell | Idle editor1 | Idle editor2
Editor 1 has file being b
Hi Folks ,
This might seem to be very trivial question but iam breaking my head over
it for a while .
My understanding is that re.search should search for the match anywhere in
the string .
why is re.search failing in the below case ??
>>> pattern
'Token-based migrations cannot be mixed wit
Ganesh Pal writes:
> why is re.search failing in the below case ??
Your pattern, '... level-based: [prev 0 , now 1]', matches a literal
string '--- level-based: ' followed by 'p', 'r', 'e', 'v', ' ', '0',
..., or '1', none of which is the '[' found in your text at that
position.
Are you sure yo
On Dec 08 at 12:22 +0530, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Hi Folks ,
>
> This might seem to be very trivial question but iam breaking my head over
> it for a while .
>
> My understanding is that re.search should search for the match anywhere in
> the string .
>
>
> why is re.search failing in the below case
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Hi Folks ,
>
> This might seem to be very trivial question but iam breaking my head over
> it for a while .
>
> My understanding is that re.search should search for the match anywhere in
> the string .
>
>
> why is re.search failing in the bel
Jussi Piitulainen writes:
> Ganesh Pal writes:
>
> > why is re.search failing in the below case ??
>
> Your pattern, '... level-based: [prev 0 , now 1]', matches a literal
> string '--- level-based: ' followed by 'p', 'r', 'e', 'v', ' ', '0',
> ..., or '1', none of which is the '[' found in you
Thanks guys , I escaped the '[' character and my issue is sloved .. Thank
you guys u all rock :)
Regards,
Ganesh
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> > Hi Folks ,
> >
> > This might seem to be very trivial question but ia
64 matches
Mail list logo
