> > def fun():
> >cfun_that_creates_q_in_local_scope()
> >def fun2():
> >cfun_that_wants_to_see_if_q_is_available()
> >
> > So the Python side actually doesn't see 'q' directly at all.
>
> I think you will need to elaborate.
Ok, here goes (and thanks for listening)
ANNOUNCING
eGenix.com mxODBC Connect
Python Database Interface
Version 2.1.2
mxODBC Connect is our commercially supported client-server product for
On 12/01/2014 05:15 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>> Put the above somewhere in your path (e.g. /usr/local/bin), make it
>> executable, and then instead of shebanging your
>> scripts with `/usr/local/bin/python` you can use `/usr/local/bin/py_m
In view of next edition of the Eric IDE Technical Report (forecast: 3rd
quarter '15) and notably with reference to the innovative Eric ver. no. 6,
we'll welcome your testimony of experiences and use of specific Eric IDE's
features;
such as:
– Special features of your choice, as: SQL Brows
On 12/2/14 4:35 AM, Kasper Peeters wrote:
def fun():
cfun_that_creates_q_in_local_scope()
def fun2():
cfun_that_wants_to_see_if_q_is_available()
So the Python side actually doesn't see 'q' directly at all.
I think you will need to elaborate.
Ok, here goes (an
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014, at 15:28, Israel Brewster wrote:
> For example, I have a URL on my Cherrypy app that updates some local
> caches. It is accessed at http:///admin/updatecaches So if I
> start typing http:///a, for example, safari may auto-fill the
> "dmin/updatecaches", and trigger a cache refr
> On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:33 AM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014, at 15:28, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> For example, I have a URL on my Cherrypy app that updates some local
>> caches. It is accessed at http:///admin/updatecaches So if I
>> start typing http:///a, for example, safa
In the process of refactoring some code, I serendipitously created what I think
is an essential new bit of Python syntax. The “or else” statement. I ended up
with:
sites_string = args.sites or else self.config['sites']
which, of course, is a syntax error today, but it got me thinking
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Wouldn’t it be neat to write:
>
>foo == 42 or else
>
> and have that be an synonym for:
>
> assert foo == 42
>
> :-)
Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise IntimidationError
instead of AssertionError when it fails?
--
Zac
On 12/02/2014 09:41 AM, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn’t it be neat to write:
>>
>>foo == 42 or else
>>
>> and have that be an synonym for:
>>
>> assert foo == 42
>
> Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise IntimidationErro
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
>> Wouldn’t it be neat to write:
>>
>>foo == 42 or else
>>
>> and have that be an synonym for:
>>
>> assert foo == 42
>>
>> :-)
>
> Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise
On 2014-12-02 11:41, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> > Wouldn’t it be neat to write:
> >
> >foo == 42 or else
> >
> > and have that be an synonym for:
> >
> > assert foo == 42
> >
> > :-)
>
> Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise
>
Tim Chase :
>> >foo == 42 or else
>
> In light of the parallel thread discussing the "assert" statement and
> the perils of trusting it to be present even though it can be
> optimized away, this "or else" could be (in the altered words of Don
> Corleone), "I'm gonna make an assertion he can't
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:28 PM, python help required
<19aada...@gmail.com> wrote:
> def penultimatePatch():
>
> win = GraphWin("Patch1",(100), 100)
> amountOfCircles = 5
>
> #Filled Red Circles
> fillCircle = Circle(Point(20,20)+100/amountOfCircles)
> fillCircle.draw(win)
>
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:28:42 -0900, Israel Brewster wrote:
> I'm running to a problem, specifically from
> Safari on the Mac, where I start to type a URL, and Safari auto-fills the
> rest of a random URL matching what I started to type, and simultaneously
> sends a request for that URL to my serve
On 02Dec2014 02:17, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 12/01/2014 05:15 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Put the above somewhere in your path (e.g. /usr/local/bin), make it
executable, and then instead of shebanging your
scripts with `/usr/local/bin/python`
On 2014-12-02 17:41:06 +, Zachary Ware said:
foo == 42 or else
Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise IntimidationError
instead of AssertionError when it fails?
That should probably be a DONTPANICError in large, friendly terminal
font letters.
--
Andrea
--
https://mail
In Nobody
writes:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:28:42 -0900, Israel Brewster wrote:
> > I'm running to a problem, specifically from
> > Safari on the Mac, where I start to type a URL, and Safari auto-fills the
> > rest of a random URL matching what I started to type, and simultaneously
> > sends a
I am new to Python - a few days old - and I would appreciate some help.
I want write a python code to parse the below XML as below:-
ServingCell--NeighbourCell
L41_NBR3347_1--L41_NBR3347_2
L41_NBR3347_1--L41_NBR3347_3
L41_NBR3347_1--L41_NBR3349_1
L41_NBR3347_1-
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014, at 10:59, Israel Brewster wrote:
> Primary because they aren’t forms, they are links. And links are, by
> definition, GET’s. That said, as I mentioned in earlier replies, if using
> a form for a simple link is the Right Way to do things like this, then I
> can change it.
As I
Are you interested in Python training for yourself or others? Can you get to
London on 9 December, 2014? If so I would very much like to meet you, and have
reserved a venue in Westminster with refreshments and lunch.
Starting in 2015 I plan to do more training in Europe (initially in the UK) and
Hi Peter Otten
re:
There is no assignment
soup_atag = whatever
but there is one to atag. The whole session should when you omit the
offending line
> atag = soup_atag.a
or insert
soup_atag = soup
before it.
-
In Uzoma Ojemeni
writes:
> I am new to Python - a few days old - and I would appreciate some help.
> I want write a python code to parse the below XML as below:-
> ServingCell--NeighbourCell
> L41_NBR3347_1--L41_NBR3347_2
> L41_NBR3347_1--L41_NBR3347_3
> L41_NBR3347_1-
Last year in late December, I did a brief, 9 question survey of 2.x vs
3.x usage.
I like the think the results were interesting, but I don't have the
spare cash to do it again this year. I probably shouldn't have done
it last year. ^_^
Is anyone interested in taking over the survey? It's on Su
Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
>> Wouldn’t it be neat to write:
>>
>>foo == 42 or else
>>
>> and have that be an synonym for:
>>
>> assert foo == 42
>>
>> :-)
>
> Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise IntimidationError
> instead
In article ,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> >> Wouldnât it be neat to write:
> >>
> >>foo == 42 or else
> >>
> >> and have that be an synonym for:
> >>
> >> assert foo == 42
> >>
>
On 12/02/2014 10:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In the process of refactoring some code, I serendipitously created what I
> think is an essential new bit of Python syntax. The “or else” statement. I
> ended up with:
>
> sites_string = args.sites or else self.config['sites']
But isn't that
Excuse is: "bad programming style".
I don't need snot telling me how to program after 20 years of programming
experience.
This is so far the only thing pissing me off in python.
Now I have to declare "global" in front of these variables every where I
want to use em:
ShipAbilityDistributeSh
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> I don't need snot telling me how to program after 20 years of programming
> experience.
>
> This is so far the only thing pissing me off in python.
>
> Now I have to declare "global" in front of these variables every where I
> want to use em:
You're still young, enjoy your youth while you can.
>-Original Message-
>From: Python-list [mailto:python-list-
>bounces+crk=godblessthe...@python.org] On Behalf Of Skybuck Flying
>Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 6:28 PM
>To: python-list@python.org
>Subject: Python handles globals badly.
On 12/02/2014 07:27 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Excuse is: "bad programming style".
>
> I don't need snot telling me how to program after 20 years of programming
> experience.
>
> This is so far the only thing pissing me off in python.
>
> Now I have to declare "global" in front of these variab
"Skybuck Flying" writes:
> I don't need snot telling me how to program after 20 years of
> programming experience.
If you've already determined what advice you do or do not need, then
you're welcome to solve your problems by yourself.
We'll be here when you decide it's time to humble yourself t
Meanwhile...
I modified my code, and added these globals in front of it.
It didn't take too long to do.
But it did add something like 300 "unnecessary" lines of code, which is what
kinda annoys me.
I'd like to keep my code compact.
Anyway I double checked to make sure other routines had glo
Some issues I'd like to address to you:
1. Structured programming requires more programming time.
2. Structured programming implies structure which might be less flexible.
3. Python objects require "self" keyword to be used everywhere, and other
akwardness wich leads to more typing/programming/w
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> I hope python one day gets rid of it;
>
> 1. To stop the confusion.
> 2. To stop the doubt.
> 3. To stop the wasted lines.
> 4. To program with more confidence.
> 5. To stop to have to inspect what's going on if one wants to know for sure.
>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Though I do hope to see a programming language some day, that is aimed at
> more mature programmers that know what they are doing.
>
> Instead of a language aimed at noobs :) a noob language which forbids
> certain styles of programming becau
On 12/02/2014 11:32 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
Some issues I'd like to address to you:
1. Structured programming requires more programming time.
2. Structured programming implies structure which might be less flexible.
3. Python objects require "self" keyword to be used everywhere, and
other akwa
On 11Nov2014 17:35, Ethan Furman wrote:
Okay, the explicit Python question: Clicking on a mail link in a web browser
can start an external program. I would like that external program to be a
Python script that: opens a new tab in the currently running browser (or a new
default browser windo
On 12/02/2014 09:32 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Some issues I'd like to address to you:
>
> 1. Structured programming requires more programming time.
> 2. Structured programming implies structure which might be less flexible.
> 3. Python objects require "self" keyword to be used everywhere, and ot
Kasper Peeters wrote:
I could in principle decide to make these settings a proper
Python object, and ask the user to create one and pass it along at
every C-function call.
I would make the C functions methods of the object holding
the settings. Your nested function example would then look
somet
Ned Batchelder wrote:
I would use thread locals for this:
https://docs.python.org/2/library/threading.html#threading.local
You could get dynamic scoping that way, but the OP
seems to want lexical scoping.
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Greetings,
> I'm a beginner of python, I just want your help.
We'll gladly do it, however you need to invest some time and write better
questions :) See http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> How can I get the Failure values from the Console in to a txt or a csv file?
We need more i
Israel Brewster wrote:
Primary because they aren’t forms, they are links. And links are, by
definition, GET’s. That said, as I mentioned in earlier replies, if using a
form for a simple link is the Right Way to do things like this, then I can
change it.
I'd look at it another way and say that a
> On 12/02/2014 09:32 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
>> Some issues I'd like to address to you:
>>
>> 1. Structured programming requires more programming time.
>> 2. Structured programming implies structure which might be less flexible.
>> 3. Python objects require "self" keyword to be used everywhere
Uzoma Ojemeni writes:
...
One easy option would be to use the "XPath" support in the "lxml"
package -- provided you have not problem with the installation
of external libraries ("libxml2" and "libxslt") and C-extensions ("lxml").
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
troll
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>> On 12/02/2014 09:32 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
>>> Some issues I'd like to address to you:
>>>
>>> 1. Structured programming requires more programming time.
>>> 2. Structured programming implies structure which might be less flexible
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> foo == 42 or else
>>
>
> Has a PERL stink to it... like: foo == 42 or die
I think this statement needs to take ellipsis as well
foo == 42 or else ...
Sturls
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
47 matches
Mail list logo
