Denis McMahon writes:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:14:05 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Denis McMahon wrote:
> >> def baseword(s):
> >> """find shortest sequence which repeats to generate s"""
> >> return s[0:["".join([s[0:x]for k in range(int(len(s)/x)+1)])[0:
Yeah, the 11 was mesmerizing. You didn't need no stinkin' program to see how
busy the system was, you just checked the lights. You could really tell when
somebody was compiling or link/loading. As I've done many times since those
days, I am amazed how many users could be using the system simultaneo
Hi
Why the following program doesn't work ?
for x in range(0, 100, 10):
fen.geometry("200x200+%d+10" % x)
time.sleep(0.5)
where fen is a window (fen = Tk())
The fen window goes from it's initial location to the last one
but we dont see all the intermediate steps
thx
--
https://m
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:32 PM, ast wrote:
> The fen window goes from it's initial location to the last one
> but we dont see all the intermediate steps
You usually don't want to use time.sleep() in a GUI program. Try doing
the same thing, but with an event loop delay call instead; often, the
dis
ast wrote:
> Why the following program doesn't work ?
>
> for x in range(0, 100, 10):
> fen.geometry("200x200+%d+10" % x)
> time.sleep(0.5)
>
>
> where fen is a window (fen = Tk())
>
> The fen window goes from it's initial location to the last one
> but we dont see all the intermed
"Chris Angelico" a écrit dans le message de
news:mailman.15536.1415264262.18130.python-l...@python.org...
You usually don't want to use time.sleep() in a GUI program. Try doing
the same thing, but with an event loop delay call instead; often, the
display won't update until you go back to the
On 11/6/2014 3:57 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:32 PM, ast wrote:
The fen window goes from it's initial location to the last one
but we dont see all the intermediate steps
You usually don't want to use time.sleep() in a GUI program. Try doing
the same thing, but with an e
Hello,
I am new to Python. I am learning boxsizer. I want to put two buttons on
my panel. One at top right corner and one at bottom right corner. How do
I achieve this?
Thanks
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ANNOUNCING
eGenix.com ThreadLock Distribution
Version 2.13.0.1
eGenix is making a ThreadLock binary distribution
available to simplify the setup for u
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Jaydip Chakrabarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to Python. I am learning boxsizer. I want to put two buttons on
> my panel. One at top right corner and one at bottom right corner. How do
> I achieve this?
>
> Thanks
First, what version of python. What is boxsizer?
On 06/11/2014 10:13, Jaydip Chakrabarty wrote:
Hello,
I am new to Python. I am learning boxsizer. I want to put two buttons on
my panel. One at top right corner and one at bottom right corner. How do
I achieve this?
Thanks
Probably best asked here
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wxp
On 2014-11-06 04:05, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 21:52:42 Mark Lawrence did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 06/11/2014 02:37, Dave Angel wrote:
> Chris Angelico Wrote in message:
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Larry Martell
wrote:
And I don't think
Larry was
I am using Python 2.7.6
Here is the code I am trying:
import wx
class MyFrame(wx.Frame):
def __init__(self, *args, **kid's):
wx.Frame.__init__(self, *args, **kwds)
self.button_1 = wx.Button(self, wx.ID_ANY, "button_1")
self.button_2 = wx.Button(self, wx.ID_ANY, "button
On Saturday, November 1, 2014 3:11:54 PM UTC+3:30, Juan Christian wrote:
> No one here uses PyCharm and Qt? =/
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Juan Christian wrote:
>
> It only occurs whule using PyCharm I tried it via pure terminal and
> everything works... =/
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct
Resolved, kinda. Just use PySide instead of PyQt.
Remove everything PyQt related from PyCharm and install PySide using the
PyCharm plugins window.
PySide has access to all modules and packages that PyQt has, but now you
need to import like "from PySide.<**> import *".
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:50
> On Nov 5, 2014, at 6:14 PM, Clayton Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Yeah, the 11 was mesmerizing. You didn't need no stinkin' program to see how
> busy the system was, you just checked the lights. You could really tell when
> somebody was compiling or link/loading. As I've done many times since those
> da
According to
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/06/hackers_use_gmail_drafts_as_dead_drops_to_control_malware_bots:
"Attacks occur in two phases. Hackers first infect a targeted
machine via simple malware that installs Python onto the device,
[...]"
--
Grant Edwards gr
On Nov 6, 2014 1:06 AM, "Rustom Mody" wrote:
> In studying (somewhat theoretically) the general world of
> collection data structures we see
> - sets -- neither order nor repetition
> - bags -- no order, repetition significant
> - lists -- both order and repetition
>
> Sometimes 'bag' is called
hi, I have strings coming in with this format:
'[one=two, three=four five, six, seven=eight]'
and I want to create from that string, this dictionary:
{'one':'two', 'three':'four five', 'six':True, 'seven':'eight'}
These are option strings, with each key-value pair separated by commas.
Wh
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 16:49:36 UTC, françai s wrote:
> I intend to write in lowest level of computer programming as a hobby.
>
> It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level
> of programming that you can write is in hex code?
>
> What is the lowest level of programm
Tim wrote:
> hi, I have strings coming in with this format:
>
> '[one=two, three=four five, six, seven=eight]'
>
> and I want to create from that string, this dictionary:
> {'one':'two', 'three':'four five', 'six':True, 'seven':'eight'}
>
> These are option strings, with each key-value
On Thursday, November 6, 2014 12:41:10 PM UTC-5, Peter Otten wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>
> > hi, I have strings coming in with this format:
> >
> > '[one=two, three=four five, six, seven=eight]'
> >
> > and I want to create from that string, this dictionary:
> > {'one':'two', 'three':'four fiv
On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 11:12:31 AM UTC-8, Ethan Furman wrote:
> If you really absolutely positively have to have the signature be correct for
> each instance, you may to either look at a
> function creating factory, a class creating factory, or a meta-class.
+1. Overriding __call__() wit
On Thursday, November 6, 2014 12:41:10 PM UTC-5, Peter Otten wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>
> > hi, I have strings coming in with this format:
> >
> > '[one=two, three=four five, six, seven=eight]'
> >
> > and I want to create from that string, this dictionary:
> > {'one':'two', 'three':'four fiv
Probably homework, you are a good man !
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Grant Edwards wrote:
> According to
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/06/hackers_use_gmail_drafts_as_dead_drops_to_control_malware_bots:
>
> "Attacks occur in two phases. Hackers first infect a targeted
>machine via simple malware that installs Python onto the device,
>[...]"
>
Roberto Martínez wrote:
> Yikes, I didn't realize the difference in inheritance.
>
> The thing with this is tricky. I need the change in the instance, not in
> the class, because I have multiple instances and all of them must have
> different implementations of __call__.
>
> The workaround of ca
On Nov 6, 2014 10:47 PM, "Sturla Molden" wrote:
>
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > According to
> >
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/06/hackers_use_gmail_drafts_as_dead_drops_to_control_malware_bots
:
> >
> > "Attacks occur in two phases. Hackers first infect a targeted
> >machine via simple
On Nov 6, 2014 10:51 AM, "Ian Kelly" wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2014 1:06 AM, "Rustom Mody" wrote:
> > Calling a bag as counter is inappropriate for an analogous reason
> > to why calling a dictionary as a 'hash' is inappropriate --
> > it confuses an implementation detail for fundamental semantics.
>
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Ivan Evstegneev
> wrote:
That's what I'm talking about (asking actually), where do you know it
from?
>>
I know it because I've been a programmer for 39 years.
>>
>> I didn't intend to offence anyone here. Just asked a question
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> But a *great* mathematician will say, "Hmmm, actually, we don't *know* that
> 2+2 equals 4, because we cannot prove that arithmetic is absolutely
> consistent. If arithmetic is not consistent, then we might simultaneously
> prove that 2+2 =
在 2014年11月5日星期三UTC+8下午8时17分11秒，larry@gmail.com写道：
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Ivan Evstegneev
> wrote:
> > Firtst of all thanks for reply.
> >
> >>>brackets [] means that the argument is optional.
> >
> > That's what I'm talking about (asking actually), where do you know it from?
>
> I
John Ladasky writes:
> On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 11:12:31 AM UTC-8, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>> If you really absolutely positively have to have the signature be correct
>> for each instance, you may to either look at a
>> function creating factory, a class creating factory, or a meta-class.
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
