On 2014-04-25 23:57:21 +, Gregory Ewing said:
I don't know what you're doing to hose your system that badly.
I've never had a problem that couldn't be fixed by deleting
whatever the last thing was I added that caused it.
The actual problem with the "native MacOSX way" is that there's no
of
On 2014-04-25 23:42:33 +, Gregory Ewing said:
That's fine if it works, but the OP said he'd already tried
various things like that and they *didn't* work for him.
By reading the "original" message (the empty reply with full quote of a
ten months earlier message) I couldn't figure what the
==
I wrote once 90 % of Python 2 apps (a generic term) supposed to
process text, strings are not working.
In Python 3, that's 100 %. It is somehow only by chance, apps may
give the illusion they are properly working.
jmf
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:32:30 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 4/25/2014 12:30 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
[...]
>> should
>>
>> re.compile('.{1,+3}')
>>
>> raise an error? It doesn't on python 2.7 or 3.3.
>
> And it should not because it is not an error. '+' means 'match 1 or more
> occurrences of the
wrote in message
news:03bb12d8-93be-4ef6-94ae-4a02789ae...@googlegroups.com...
> ==
>
> I wrote once 90 % of Python 2 apps (a generic term) supposed to
> process text, strings are not working.
>
> In Python 3, that's 100 %. It is somehow only by chance, apps may
> give the illusion they
"Frank Millman" writes:
> wrote […]
> It is quite frustrating when you make these statements without
> explaining what you mean by 'not working'.
Please do not engage “wxjmfauth” on this topic; he is an
amply-demonstrated troll with nothing tangible to back up his incessant
complaints about Un
On 4/26/14 1:50 AM, Andrew Konstantaras wrote:
I wrote the following code that works in Python 2.7 that takes the
variables passed to the function into a dictionary. The following call:
strA = 'a'
intA = 1
dctA = makeDict(strA, intA)
produces the following dictionary:
On Apr 26, 2014 3:46 AM, "Frank Millman" wrote:
>
>
> wrote in message
> news:03bb12d8-93be-4ef6-94ae-4a02789ae...@googlegroups.com...
> > ==
> >
> > I wrote once 90 % of Python 2 apps (a generic term) supposed to
> > process text, strings are not working.
> >
> > In Python 3, that's 100
On Apr 26, 2014 8:12 AM, "Ned Batchelder" wrote:
> Looking at your code, I see:
>
>
> tplArgs = map(None, lstVarNames, args)
>
> I didn't realize map accepted a callable of None (TIL!), but it no longer
does in Python 3. You'll have to do this a different way.
The Python 3 replacement for ma
First of all, thank you all for your answers. I received python
mail-list in a daily digest, so it is not easy for me to quote your
mail separately.
I will try to explain my situation to my best, but English is not my
native language, I don't know whether I can make it clear at last.
Every SECTIO
tad na writes:
> python 2.7.2
>
> The following code has an error and I can not figure out why:
>
> import feedparser
> d = feedparser.parse('http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock.rss')
> numb = len(d['entries'])
> for post in d.entries:
> print post.pubDate+"\n"
>
> ---
On 2014-04-26 03:16, tad na wrote:
python 2.7.2
The following code has an error and I can not figure out why:
import feedparser
d = feedparser.parse('http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock.rss')
numb = len(d['entries'])
for post in d.entries:
print post.pubDate+"\n"
-
On 2014-04-26 23:53, oyster wrote:
> I will try to explain my situation to my best, but English is not my
> native language, I don't know whether I can make it clear at last.
Your follow-up reply made much more sense and your written English is
far better than many native speakers'. :-)
> Every S
You guys are good. thanks.
===
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:55:35 AM UTC-5, MRAB wrote:
On 2014-04-26 03:16, tad na wrote:
python 2.7.2
The following code has an error and I can not figure out why:
import feedparser
d = feedparser.parse('http://bl.oc
On 04/25/2014 10:53 AM, Charles Hixson wrote:
What is the proper way to delete selected items during iteration of a
map? What I want to do is:
for (k, v) in m.items():
if f(k):
# do some processing of v and save result elsewhere
del m[k]
But this gives (as should be expected):
On 2014-04-26 12:25, Charles Hixson wrote:
> I expect that I'll be deleting around 1/3 during
> each iteration of the process...and then adding new ones back in.
> There shouldn't be a really huge number of deletions on any
> particular pass, but it will be looped through many times...
If you have
Charles Hixson wrote:
> What is the proper way to delete selected items during iteration of a
> map? What I want to do is:
>
> for (k, v) in m.items():
> if f(k):
># do some processing of v and save result elsewhere
>del m[k]
>
> But this gives (as should be expected):
>
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 12:25:27 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
> On 04/25/2014 10:53 AM, Charles Hixson wrote:
>> What is the proper way to delete selected items during iteration of a
>> map? What I want to do is:
>>
>> for (k, v) in m.items():
>>if f(k):
>> # do some processing of v and sa
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I think the two obviously good enough approaches are:
>
> - save a "to be deleted" list, then delete those keys;
>
> - copy the "not to be deleted" items into a new dict
For a small enough dict that the performance question doesn't matter
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:53:14 +0800, oyster wrote:
> Every SECTION starts with 2 special lines; these 2 lines is special
> because they have some same characters (the length is not const for
> different section) at the beginning; these same characters is called the
> KEY for this section. For every
In article <535c67e9$0$29965$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I think the two obviously good enough approaches are:
>
> - save a "to be deleted" list, then delete those keys;
>
> - copy the "not to be deleted" items into a new dict
There is a third possibility:
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
