On 10/11/2013 11:50 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 12.10.13 08:34, schrieb John Nagle:
>> I'm trying to find out which version of glibc Python is using.
>> I need a fix that went into glibc 2.10 back in 2009.
>> (http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20948.html)
>>
>> So I try the recommended way t
In article , John Nagle
wrote:
[...]
> Why is the info from "plaform.libc_ver()" so bogus?
The code is here:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/platform.py#l141
Perhaps you could open an issue on the Python bug tracker.
--
Ned Deily,
n...@acm.org
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman
Am 12.10.13 09:20, schrieb Ned Deily:
In article , John Nagle
wrote:
[...]
Why is the info from "plaform.libc_ver()" so bogus?
The code is here:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/platform.py#l141
Perhaps you could open an issue on the Python bug tracker.
That function is really bo
Am 12.10.13 09:53, schrieb Christian Gollwitzer:
Am 12.10.13 09:20, schrieb Ned Deily:
In article , John Nagle
wrote:
[...]
Why is the info from "plaform.libc_ver()" so bogus?
The code is here:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/platform.py#l141
Perhaps you could open an issue on th
On 10/12/2013 3:53 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 12.10.13 09:20, schrieb Ned Deily:
In article , John Nagle
wrote:
[...]
Why is the info from "plaform.libc_ver()" so bogus?
The code is here:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/platform.py#l141
Perhaps you could open an issue on
I've been working on a program and have had to halt it due a slight problem.
Here's a basic version of the code:
a = 'filled'
b = 'filled'
c = 'empty'
d = 'empty'
e = 'filled'
f = 'empty'
g = 'filled'
testdict = {a : 'apple' , b : 'banana' , c : 'cake' , d : 'damson' , e : 'eggs'
, f : 'fish' ,
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 10:56:27 AM UTC+2, reuben...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've been working on a program and have had to halt it due a slight problem.
> Here's a basic version of the code:
>
>
>
> a = 'filled'
>
> b = 'filled'
>
> c = 'empty'
>
> d = 'empty'
>
> e = 'filled'
>
> f = 'e
reubennott...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've been working on a program and have had to halt it due a slight
> problem. Here's a basic version of the code:
>
> a = 'filled'
> b = 'filled'
> c = 'empty'
> d = 'empty'
> e = 'filled'
> f = 'empty'
> g = 'filled'
>
> testdict = {a : 'apple' , b : 'banana' ,
On 12/10/2013 09:56, reubennott...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working on a program and have had to halt it due a slight problem.
Here's a basic version of the code:
a = 'filled'
b = 'filled'
c = 'empty'
d = 'empty'
e = 'filled'
f = 'empty'
g = 'filled'
testdict = {a : 'apple' , b : 'banana' ,
reubennott...@gmail.com writes:
> [...] The following doesn't work.
>
> for fillempt in testdict:
> if fillempt == 'filled':
> print(testdict[fillempt])
This is equivalent to
for fillempt in testdict:
if fillempt == 'filled':
print(testdict['filled'])
which in turn can be
On 10/12/13 2:20 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Stephen Tucker wrote:
On the original question, well, I accept Ned's answer (at 10.22). I also
like the idea of a helper function given by Peter Otten at 09.51. It still
seems like a crutch to help poor old Python 2.X to do
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 10:20:24 AM UTC+1, Peter Otten wrote:
> reubennott...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > I've been working on a program and have had to halt it due a slight
>
> > problem. Here's a basic version of the code:
>
> >
>
> > a = 'filled'
>
> > b = 'filled'
>
> > c = 'empty
On 12/10/2013 12:03, reubennott...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 10:20:24 AM UTC+1, Peter Otten wrote:
reubennott...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working on a program and have had to halt it due a slight
problem. Here's a basic version of the code:
a = 'filled'
b
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 3:53 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>>
>> That function is really bogus. It states itself, that it has "intimate
>> knowledge of how different libc versions add symbols to the executable
>> and thus is probably only useable for e
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 05:43:22 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 10/12/2013 3:53 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>>>
>>> That function is really bogus. It states itself, that it has "intimate
>>> knowledge of how different libc versions add symbols
In article ,
Ned Batchelder wrote:
> This idea that the repr can reconstruct the object always fell flat with
> me since the vast majority of classes don't have a repr that works that
> way. I look at it a little differently: the repr is meant to be as
> unambiguous as possible to a develope
I am new to programming and trying to figure out python.
I am trying to learn which tools and tutorials I need to use along with some
good beginner tutorials in scraping the the web. The end result I am trying to
come up with is scraping auto dealership sites for the following:
1.N
On 12/10/2013 15:12, Ronald Routt wrote:
I am new to programming and trying to figure out python.
I am trying to learn which tools and tutorials I need to use along with some
good beginner tutorials in scraping the the web. The end result I am trying to
come up with is scraping auto d
On 10/12/2013 7:43 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/12/2013 3:53 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
That function is really bogus. It states itself, that it has "intimate
knowledge of how different libc versions add symbols to the executable
and thus
Hello guys I am currently working in a python project at my school. First I
want to make clear that I'm not a python programmer (I was just called to put
out the flames in this project because no one else would and I was brave enough
to say yes).
I have the following problem here. I have to wri
carlos.ortiz@gmail.com writes:
> So I wrote my method like this:
...
> cnxOMC = mysql.connector.connect(user,
>password,
>'localhost',
>database)
...
> the following co
On 12/10/2013 17:09, carlos.ortiz@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys I am currently working in a python project at my school. First I
want to make clear that I'm not a python programmer (I was just called to put
out the flames in this project because no one else would and I was brave enough
to sa
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 11:46:49 AM UTC-5, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> carlos.o...@gmail.com writes:
>
>
>
> > So I wrote my method like this:
>
> ...
>
> > cnxOMC = mysql.connector.connect(user,
>
> >password,
>
> >
I don't know about civic hacking, but Trello is a free online tool to
track high level aspects of collaborative projects. It is somewhat
focused on a "to do" planning perspective. But with the customizable
columns, labels, and checklists associated with items in the view I
think you might be able t
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 12:13:05 PM UTC-5, MRAB wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 17:09, carlos.o...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hello guys I am currently working in a python project at my school. First I
> > want to make clear that I'm not a python programmer (I was just called to
> > put out the flames
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 05:43:22 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Easier said than done. The module is currently written in pure
> Python, and the comment "Note: Please keep this module compatible to
> Python 1.5.2" would appear to rule out the use of ctypes to call the
> glibc function.
Last I heard, ther
(You're not subscribed!)
You want to apply issue #19038.
When you try to log in to Python bug tracker using your account
(taewong.seo), a message says that “you don't have permission to
login”.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 7:43 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/12/2013 3:53 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
That function is really bogus. It states itself, that it has "intimate
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:12:38 AM UTC-7, Ronald Routt wrote:
> I am new to programming and trying to figure out python.
>
>
>
> I am trying to learn which tools and tutorials I need to use along with some
> good beginner tutorials in scraping the the web. The end result I am trying
>
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:51:21 AM UTC-7, Tim wrote:
> I've read a couple of articles about this, but still not sure.
>
> When someone talks about a closure in another language (I'm learning Lua on
> the side), is that the same concept as a decorator in Python?
>
>
>
> It sure looks like
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Peter Cacioppi
wrote:
> Along with "batteries included" and "we're all adults", I think Python needs
> a pithy phrase summarizing how well thought out it is. That is to say, the
> major design decisions were all carefully considered, and as a result things
> tha
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:37:58 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> This is design. Python has a king (Guido). It wasn't built by a
> committee. Maybe you won't like some aspect of Python's design, but it
> has one, it's not just sloppily slapped together.
While I agree with your general thrust, I don't
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:37:58 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> This is design. Python has a king (Guido). It wasn't built by a
>> committee. Maybe you won't like some aspect of Python's design, but it
>> has one, it's not just sloppily slap
The lockfile solution seems to be working, thank you.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Piet van Oostrum wrote:
> Jason Friedman writes:
>
>> I have a 3rd-party process that runs for about a minute and supports
>> only a single execution at a time.
>>
>> $ deploy
>>
>> If I want to launch a seco
34 matches
Mail list logo
