Re: Beautiful Soup Table Parsing

2012-08-09 Thread Andreas Perstinger
On 09.08.2012 01:58, Tom Russell wrote: For instance this code below: soup = BeautifulSoup(urlopen('http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3021-tradingdiary2.html?mod=mdc_pastcalendar')) table = soup.find("table",{"class": "mdcTable"}) for row in table.findAll("tr"): for cell in row.find

Re: Looking for a good introduction to object oriented programming with Python

2012-08-09 Thread lipska the kat
On 09/08/12 03:59, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 20:31:57 +0100, lipska the kat declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: [snip] If a "node" is a father or mother, and it takes one of each to produce a "leaf", your "tree" has just collapsed. This would

Re: Is there a clever way to pass arguments

2012-08-09 Thread Jean-Michel Pichavant
bruceg113...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way in Python to pass arguments without listing each argument? For example, my program does the following: testData (z[0], z[1], z[2], z[3], z[4], z[5], z[6], z[7]) Is there a clever way to pass arguments in a single statement knowing that each argu

Re: Is there a clever way to pass arguments

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote: > bruceg113...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> I cannot change the function definition. > > or better (imo) > testData(z) and make testData handle a list (8 parameters, that's a lot of > parameters). He can't change the function definition. Chr

Re: Is there a clever way to pass arguments

2012-08-09 Thread Jean-Michel Pichavant
Chris Angelico wrote: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote: bruceg113...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot change the function definition. or better (imo) testData(z) and make testData handle a list (8 parameters, that's a lot of parameters). He can't chan

pycups

2012-08-09 Thread loial
I am looking to monitor print jobs on linux via python. pycups looks a possibility, but I cannot find any useful tutorial, examples of how to use it. Can anyone help? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Getting started with IDLE and Python - no highlighting and no execution

2012-08-09 Thread soloflyr
On Sunday, August 5, 2012 7:46:54 PM UTC-4, PeterSo wrote: > I am just starting to learn Python, and I like to use the editor > > instead of the interactive shell. So I wrote the following little > > program in IDLE > > > > # calculating the mean > > > > data1=[49, 66, 24, 98, 37, 64, 98, 2

[ANN] PyInstaller 2.0

2012-08-09 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Hello, on behalf of the PyInstaller development team I'm happy to announce PyInstaller 2.0. http://www.pyinstaller.org Special thanks to Martin Zibricky who did most of the development work for this release. === What it is === PyInstaller is a program that converts (packages) Python progra

Python and OSX 10.8

2012-08-09 Thread David Thomas
Im looking to upgrade my Mac to 10.8 and I'm worried if Python and IDLE may not run on it. When I try to run this command in Terminal: python -m idlelib.idle I can not launch IDLE which comes bundled on Mac. On Lion it's been fine but I've tried it on my friend's copy of Mountain Lion and it wil

socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread lipska the kat
First of all sincere apologies if this is blindingly obvious and I just missed it In the documentation at http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/socketserver.html mention is made more than once of a class socketserver.StreamRequestHandler in the examples in this chapter we see usage examples for

Re: Python and OSX 10.8

2012-08-09 Thread William R. Wing (Bill Wing)
On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:38 AM, David Thomas wrote: > Im looking to upgrade my Mac to 10.8 and I'm worried if Python and IDLE may > not run on it. > When I try to run this command in Terminal: python -m idlelib.idle > I can not launch IDLE which comes bundled on Mac. On Lion it's been fine but >

Re: Is there a clever way to pass arguments

2012-08-09 Thread Alister
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:13:31 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jean-Michel Pichavant > wrote: >> bruceg113...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> I cannot change the function definition. >> >> or better (imo) >> testData(z) and make testData handle a list (8 parameters, that's a

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread lipska the kat
On 09/08/12 18:39, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:15:33 +0100, lipska the kat declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: in the examples in this chapter we see usage examples for socketserver.BaseRequestHandler So far as I can tell, all RequestHandler ob

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread lipska the kat
On 09/08/12 18:39, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:15:33 +0100, lipska the kat declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: in the examples in this chapter we see usage examples for socketserver.BaseRequestHandler So far as I can tell, all RequestHandler ob

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 09/08/2012 19:37, lipska the kat wrote: On 09/08/12 18:39, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:15:33 +0100, lipska the kat declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: in the examples in this chapter we see usage examples for socketserver.BaseRequestHandler So

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread Peter Otten
lipska the kat wrote: > If there isn't how does one go about > contributing to the documentation. http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/bugs.html A similar link should be right there in the footer of the socketserver documentation. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem

2012-08-09 Thread 88888 Dihedral
Nobody於 2012年8月7日星期二UTC+8下午11時32分55秒寫道: > On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:33 -0700, Larry Hudson wrote: > > > > >> for i in range(N,N+100): > > >> for j in range(M,M+100): > > >> do_something(i % 100 ,j % 100) > > >> > > >> Emile > > > > > > How about... > > > >

Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem

2012-08-09 Thread 88888 Dihedral
Nobody於 2012年8月7日星期二UTC+8下午11時32分55秒寫道: > On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:33 -0700, Larry Hudson wrote: > > > > >> for i in range(N,N+100): > > >> for j in range(M,M+100): > > >> do_something(i % 100 ,j % 100) > > >> > > >> Emile > > > > > > How about... > > > >

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread lipska the kat
On 09/08/12 19:55, Mark Lawrence wrote: On 09/08/2012 19:37, lipska the kat wrote: On 09/08/12 18:39, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:15:33 +0100, lipska the kat declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: in the examples in this chapter we see usage examples for s

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread lipska the kat
On 09/08/12 20:07, Peter Otten wrote: lipska the kat wrote: If there isn't how does one go about contributing to the documentation. http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/bugs.html A similar link should be right there in the footer of the socketserver documentation. It is indeed, thank you. lips

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread Dave Angel
On 08/09/2012 02:37 PM, lipska the kat wrote: > On 09/08/12 18:39, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:15:33 +0100, lipska the kat >> declaimed the following in >> gmane.comp.python.general: >> >> >>> in the examples in this chapter we see usage examples for >>> socketserver.BaseRe

Re: socketserver.BaseRequestHandler and socketserver.StreamRequestServer docs

2012-08-09 Thread Terry Reedy
On 8/9/2012 1:39 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:15:33 +0100, lipska the kat declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: in the examples in this chapter we see usage examples for socketserver.BaseRequestHandler So far as I can tell, all RequestHandler

Re: Is there a clever way to pass arguments

2012-08-09 Thread GangGreene
Alister wrote: [putolin] > some people read these threads to learn general concepts & not to find > answers to a single explicit case. Some people (me) don't know the first thing about python and are in the learning/exploratory phase. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Is there a clever way to pass arguments

2012-08-09 Thread Terry Reedy
On 8/9/2012 5:50 AM, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote: Chris Angelico wrote: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote: bruceg113...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot change the function definition. or better (imo) testData(z) and make testData handle a list (8 parameters, that's a lot

Re: no data exclution and unique combination.

2012-08-09 Thread giuseppe . amatulli
Terry and MRAB, thanks for yours suggestions, in the end i found this solution mask=( a != 0 ) & ( b != 0 ) a_mask=a[mask] b_mask=b[mask] array2D = np.array(zip(a_mask,b_mask)) unique=dict() for row in array2D : row = tuple(row) if row in unique: unique[row] += 1 else:

save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread giuseppe . amatulli
Hi, I have a dict() unique like this {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} and i want to print to a file without the brackets comas and semicolon in order to obtain something like this? 4 5 1 5 4 1 4 4 2 2 3 1 4 3 2 Any ideas? Thanks in advance Giuseppe -- http://mail.python.o

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Roman Vashkevich
for key in dict: print key[0], key[1], dict[key] 10.08.2012, в 0:11, giuseppe.amatu...@gmail.com написал(а): > Hi, > I have a dict() unique > like this > {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} > and i want to print to a file without the brackets comas and semicolon in > ord

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Oscar Benjamin
On Aug 9, 2012 9:17 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > I have a dict() unique > like this > {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} > and i want to print to a file without the brackets comas and semicolon in order to obtain something like this? > 4 5 1 > 5 4 1 > 4 4 2 > 2 3 1 > 4 3 2 > Any ideas

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Tim Chase
On 08/09/12 15:22, Roman Vashkevich wrote: >> {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} >> and i want to print to a file without the brackets comas and semicolon in >> order to obtain something like this? >> 4 5 1 >> 5 4 1 >> 4 4 2 >> 2 3 1 >> 4 3 2 > > for key in dict: > prin

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Giuseppe Amatulli
thanks for the fast replies my testing were very closed to yours but i did not know how On 9 August 2012 15:25, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2012 9:17 PM, wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have a dict() unique >> like this >> {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} >> and i want to pr

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Giuseppe Amatulli
thanks for the fast replies my testing were very closed to yours but i did not know how to print the the number after the semicolon! thanks! On 9 August 2012 15:25, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2012 9:17 PM, wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have a dict() unique >> like this >> {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Gelonida N
On 08/09/2012 10:11 PM, giuseppe.amatu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a dict() unique like this {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} and i want to print to a file without the brackets comas and semicolon in order to obtain something like this? 4 5 1 5 4 1 4 4 2 2 3 1 4 3 2 Any

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Roman Vashkevich
dict.items() is a list - linear access time whereas with 'for key in dict:' access time is constant: http://python.net/~goodger/projects/pycon/2007/idiomatic/handout.html#use-in-where-possible-1 10.08.2012, в 0:35, Tim Chase написал(а): > On 08/09/12 15:22, Roman Vashkevich wrote: >>> {(4, 5):

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 09/08/2012 21:41, Roman Vashkevich wrote: dict.items() is a list - linear access time whereas with 'for key in dict:' access time is constant: http://python.net/~goodger/projects/pycon/2007/idiomatic/handout.html#use-in-where-possible-1 10.08.2012, в 0:35, Tim Chase написал(а): On 08/09/1

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Tim Chase
On 08/09/12 15:41, Roman Vashkevich wrote: > 10.08.2012, в 0:35, Tim Chase написал(а): >> On 08/09/12 15:22, Roman Vashkevich wrote: {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} and i want to print to a file without the brackets comas and semicolon in order to obtain some

Re: no data exclution and unique combination.

2012-08-09 Thread Dave Angel
On 08/09/2012 04:06 PM, giuseppe.amatu...@gmail.com wrote: > > > print unique > {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} > > I choose this solution because i could not install "from collections import > Counter". Nothing to install, at least for Python 2.7. collections is in the

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Roman Vashkevich
Actually, they are different. Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred thousand entries, and you will feel the difference. Dict uses hashing to get a value from the dict and this is why it's O(1). 10.08.2012, в 1:21, Tim Chase написал(а): > On 08/09/12 15:41, Roman V

Re: no data exclution and unique combination.

2012-08-09 Thread Terry Reedy
On 8/9/2012 4:06 PM, giuseppe.amatu...@gmail.com wrote: Terry and MRAB, thanks for yours suggestions, in the end i found this solution mask=( a != 0 ) & ( b != 0 ) a_mask=a[mask] b_mask=b[mask] array2D = np.array(zip(a_mask,b_mask)) unique=dict() for row in array2D : row = tuple(row)

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Terry Reedy
On 8/9/2012 5:21 PM, Tim Chase wrote: On 08/09/12 15:41, Roman Vashkevich wrote: 10.08.2012, в 0:35, Tim Chase написал(а): On 08/09/12 15:22, Roman Vashkevich wrote: {(4, 5): 1, (5, 4): 1, (4, 4): 2, (2, 3): 1, (4, 3): 2} and i want to print to a file without the brackets comas and semicolon i

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Dave Angel
On 08/09/2012 05:34 PM, Roman Vashkevich wrote: > Actually, they are different. > Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred > thousand entries, and you will feel the difference. > Dict uses hashing to get a value from the dict and this is why it's O(1). Sure, that's wh

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Kaynor
I realized, I should have done 10, 100, 1000 rather than 1, 10, 100 for better results, so here are the results for 1000 items. It still maintains the same pattern: >>> timeit.timeit('for i in d: pass', 'd=dict.fromkeys(range(1000))') 10.166595947685153 >>> timeit.timeit('for i in d.iteritems(): p

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Kaynor
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Roman Vashkevich wrote: > > Actually, they are different. > Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred > thousand entries, and you will feel the difference. > Dict uses hashing to get a value from the dict and this is why it's O(1). > Us

trying to create simple py script

2012-08-09 Thread Smaran Harihar
Hi Guys, I am trying to create a simple cgi-script to receive a Ajax call, manipulate the string received and send it back as JSON. Most of the people I have spoken to, seemed to be against using the cgi script, but most of the documentation and tutorials seem to point to cgi for AJAX calls. They

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Giuseppe Amatulli
Thanks a lot for the clarification. Actually my problem is giving to raster dataset in geo-tif format find out unique pair combination, count the number of observation unique combination in rast1, count the number of observation unique combination in rast2, count the number of observation I try di

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Roman Vashkevich
10.08.2012, в 1:47, Dave Angel написал(а): > On 08/09/2012 05:34 PM, Roman Vashkevich wrote: >> Actually, they are different. >> Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred >> thousand entries, and you will feel the difference. >> Dict uses hashing to get a value from th

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote: > Actually, they are different. > Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred > thousand entries, and you will feel the difference. > Dict uses hashing to get a value from the dict and this is why it's O(1). > Sligtly off top

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Dave Angel
On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote: >> Actually, they are different. >> Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred >> thousand entries, and you will feel the difference. >> Dict uses hashing to get a value from the

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Tim Chase
On 08/09/12 17:26, Dave Angel wrote: > On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > I'm glad you're wrong for CPython's dictionaries. The only time the > lookup would degenerate to O[n] would be if the hash table had only one > slot. CPython sensibly increases the hash table size when it become

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Kaynor
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Dave Angel wrote: > On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote: >>> Actually, they are different. >>> Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred >>> thousand entries, and you will feel the

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Dave Angel wrote: > On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> O(n) for all other entries in the dict which suffer a hash collision >> with the searched entry. >> >> True, a sensible choice of hash function will reduce n to 1 in common >> cases, but it becomes

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 09/08/2012 23:26, Dave Angel wrote: > On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote: >>> Actually, they are different. >>> Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred >>> thousand entries, and you will feel the difference.

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Tim Chase wrote: > On 08/09/12 17:26, Dave Angel wrote: >> On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> I'm glad you're wrong for CPython's dictionaries. The only time the >> lookup would degenerate to O[n] would be if the hash table had only one >> slot. CPyt

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Oscar Benjamin
> What do you think? is there a way to speed up the process? > Thanks > Giuseppe Which part is slow? How slow is it? A simple test to find the slow part of your code is to print messages between the commands so that you can see how long it takes between each message. Oscar. -- http://mail.pytho

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Roy Smith
In article , Andrew Cooper wrote: > As for poor implementations, > > class Foo(object): > def __hash__(self): > return 0 > > I seriously found that in some older code I had the misfortune of > reading. Python assumes you are a consenting adult. If you wish to engage in activitie

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > Python assumes you are a consenting adult. If you wish to engage in > activities which are hazardous to your health, so be it. ... you mean, Python lets you make a hash of it? *ducks for cover* ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Roy Smith
In article , Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > > Python assumes you are a consenting adult. If you wish to engage in > > activities which are hazardous to your health, so be it. > > ... you mean, Python lets you make a hash of it? > Only if you orde

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 10/08/2012 00:24, Roy Smith wrote: In article , Chris Angelico wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roy Smith wrote: Python assumes you are a consenting adult. If you wish to engage in activities which are hazardous to your health, so be it. ... you mean, Python lets you make a ha

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Dave Angel
On 08/09/2012 06:54 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 09/08/2012 23:26, Dave Angel wrote: >> On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote: Actually, they are different. Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Dave Angel
On 08/09/2012 06:53 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Dave Angel wrote: >> On 08/09/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> O(n) for all other entries in the dict which suffer a hash collision >>> with the searched entry. >>> >>> True, a sensible choice of hash function

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Oscar Benjamin
On Aug 10, 2012 12:34 AM, "Giuseppe Amatulli" wrote: > > Ciao, > is 12 minutes for 5000x5000 pixel image. half of the time is for > reading the arrays. > and the other half for making the loop. > I will try again to incorporate the mask action in the loop > and > read the image line by line. > Tha

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Tim Chase
On 08/09/12 18:33, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 10/08/2012 00:24, Roy Smith wrote: >>> ... you mean, Python lets you make a hash of it? >> >> Only if you order it with spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, and spam. > > Now now gentlemen we're getting slightly off topic here and wouldn't > want to ups

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Dave Angel
On 08/09/2012 08:16 PM, Tim Chase wrote: > On 08/09/12 18:33, Mark Lawrence wrote: >> On 10/08/2012 00:24, Roy Smith wrote: ... you mean, Python lets you make a hash of it? >>> Only if you order it with spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, and spam. >> Now now gentlemen we're getting slightly o

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Tim Chase wrote: > We apologise for the off-topicness in the thread. Those responsible > have been sacked... So if you take every mapping variable in your program and name them "dFoo", "dBar", "dQuux", etc, for "dict"... would that be a dirty Hungarian dictionar

Re: save dictionary to a file without brackets.

2012-08-09 Thread 88888 Dihedral
Andrew Cooper於 2012年8月10日星期五UTC+8上午6時03分26秒寫道: > On 09/08/2012 22:34, Roman Vashkevich wrote: > > > Actually, they are different. > > > Put a dict.{iter}items() in an O(k^N) algorithm and make it a hundred > > thousand entries, and you will feel the difference. > > > Dict uses hashing to get a

Re: trying to create simple py script

2012-08-09 Thread Lutz Horn
Hi Smaran, Am Do, 9. Aug 2012, um 23:52, schrieb Smaran Harihar: > I am trying to create a simple cgi-script to receive a Ajax > call, manipulate the string received and send it back as JSON. I can recommend bottle. The following example manipulates a JSON request body and returns it. That is *mu