The RotatingFileHandler running on win 7 64-bit; py 2.7 is failing
when the script launches a process using subprocess.Popen. Works fine
if the subprocess is not launched
The exception thrown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Python27\lib\logging\handlers.py", line 78, in emit
self
Paul Rubin wrote:
> dreamingforw...@gmail.com writes:
>>> hanging out on the Prothon list now and then, at least until we get
>>> the core language sorted out?
>>
>> Haha, a little late, but consider this a restart.
>
> It wasn't til I saw the word "Prothon" that I scrolled back and saw you
> wer
I'm shifting life gears, trying to get away from the computer more during my
hours away from work. As part of that, I'm looking to get out of the
package authorship/maintenance business. Currently, I am officially listed
as the "maintainer" (I use that term loosely - I really do very little at
t
Hi,
Familiarizing myself with Tkinter I'm stuck trying to fill a Canvas
with an image. I believe the class I need is PhotoImage rather than
BitmapImage. But I have no luck with either. The PhotoImage doc lists
available handlers for writing GIF and PPM files. It doesn't say
anything about r
Hello,
I am using sqlite3 modules to get data out of a table. I would like to dump
the table into a restructured-text (docutil) format. I was wondering if
there was a library which would accomplish this.
--
--- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.--
--
http://mail.pyt
Well, I checked unit 2 out the other day. It is indeed of poor standard and
to some extend a waste of time for me. However, I see it as another way of
having fun.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Josh English wrote:
> On Monday, February 27, 2012 6:37:25 PM UTC-8, Ray Clark wrote:
> >
> > You have
I'm trying to re-build Python 3.2 with support for TCL/TK 8.5, but when I
run "make" I get this message:
Failed to build these modules:
_tkinter
and after installing 3.2 I still have this:
>>> import _tkinter
>>> _tkinter.TK_VERSION
'8.4'
What do I need to do to have Python 3.2 use tcl/tk 8.5
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:36:52PM +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm trying to re-build Python 3.2 with support for TCL/TK 8.5, but when I
> run "make" I get this message:
>
> Failed to build these modules:
> _tkinter
>
> and after installing 3.2 I still have this:
>
> >>> import _tkinter
> >
s...@pobox.com writes:
> Some time ago Ben Finney offered to take over lockfile.
That offer is still open. (Though I would appreciate ongoing development
help from people who use non-Linux operating systems, since file locking
works differently there and I don't have the resources to test on
thos
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:17:40 -0800, Westley Martínez wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:36:52PM +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> I'm trying to re-build Python 3.2 with support for TCL/TK 8.5, but when
>> I run "make" I get this message:
>>
>> Failed to build these modules:
>> _tkinter
>>
>> and
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:50:53AM +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Okay, now I'm making progress... if I remove the previously existing
> _tkinter in lib-dynload, and re-run "make", I get something new:
>
> building '_tkinter' extension
> gcc -pthread -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrap
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:06:39 -0800, Westley Martínez wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:50:53AM +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Okay, now I'm making progress... if I remove the previously existing
>> _tkinter in lib-dynload, and re-run "make", I get something new:
>>
>> building '_tkinter' exte
On Mar 2, 4:16 pm, John Salerno wrote:
> what is the point of creating a Frame object at all? I tried NOT
> doing it, like you said, and it seemed to work fine with my simple
> example. But is there a benefit to using a Frame object to group the
> widgets together? Or is it cleaner to just use the
How can I get the *really* original command line that started my python
interpreter?
Werkzeug has a WSGI server which reloads itself when files are changed
on disk. It uses `args = [sys.executable] + sys.argv` to kind of
recreate the command line, and the uses subprocess.call to run that
command l
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> How can I get the *really* original command line that started my python
> interpreter?
>
> Werkzeug has a WSGI server which reloads itself when files are changed
> on disk. It uses `args = [sys.executable] + sys.argv` to kind of
> recreat
> How can I get the *really* original command line that started my python
> interpreter?
>
> Werkzeug has a WSGI server which reloads itself when files are changed
> on disk. It uses `args = [sys.executable] + sys.argv` to kind of
> recreate the command line, and the uses subprocess.call to run th
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>> How can I get the *really* original command line that started my python
>> interpreter?
> On Linux, you can read from:
> /proc//cmdline
> to get the null-delimited "command line"
>>> How can I get the *really* original command line that started my python
>>> interpreter?
>
>> On Linux, you can read from:
>>/proc//cmdline
>> to get the null-delimited "command line".
>
> After some further searching:
> psutil offers `Process.cmdline` cross-platform;
> see http://code.go
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> How come?
> I'm using explicit relative imports, I thought they were the new thing?
Explicit relative imports are fine. Implicit relative imports can
create multiple module objects for the same source file, which breaks
things like excep
19 matches
Mail list logo
