Am 24.02.12 14:37, schrieb Rick Johnson:
> I get sick and tired of doing this!!!
>
> if maxlength == UNLIMITED:
> allow_passage()
> elif len(string) > maxlength:
> deny_passage()
>
> What Python needs is some constant that can be compared to ANY numeric
> type and that constant will ALWAY
There is many packaging solutions for python.
I was confused about that but it's nothing. I had to pick one of them.
I picked distutils because it's part of standard python since 3.3, am
i right?
My goal is to write setup.py with this feature: 'download required
package if not installed already, li
XLiIV, 25.02.2012 15:47:
> There is many packaging solutions for python.
> I was confused about that but it's nothing. I had to pick one of them.
> I picked distutils because it's part of standard python since 3.3, am
> i right?
Distutils has been part of Python's stdlib for ages.
> My goal is t
25.02.12 02:37, MRAB написав(ла):
We already have arbitrarily long ints, so there could be a special
infinite int singleton (actually, 2 of them, one positive, the other
negative).
float('inf') and float('-inf').
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
I have written a c++ library which embeds python functions as described in
http://docs.python.org/extending/embedding.html. Everything works fine, I can
import and use modules such as numpy by calling PyImport_ImportModule(...).
Now I wrapped this c++ library for java using SWIG. However,
On 25/02/2012 08:18, Wolfgang Meiners wrote:
Am 24.02.12 14:37, schrieb Rick Johnson:
I get sick and tired of doing this!!!
if maxlength == UNLIMITED:
allow_passage()
elif len(string)> maxlength:
deny_passage()
What Python needs is some constant that can be compared to ANY numer
We're pleased to announce the immediate availability of release candidates for
Python 2.6.8, 2.7.3, 3.1.5, and 3.2.3 . The main impetus for these releases is
fixing a security issue in Python's hash based types, dict and set, as described
below. Python 2.7.3 and 3.2.3 include the security patch and
> For every floating point
> number there is a corresponding real number, but 0% of real numbers
> can be represented exactly by floating point numbers.
It seems to me that there are a great many real numbers that can be
represented exactly by floating point numbers. The number 1 is an
example.
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 09:56 -0800, Tobiah wrote:
> > For every floating point
> > number there is a corresponding real number, but 0% of real numbers
> > can be represented exactly by floating point numbers.
>
> It seems to me that there are a great many real numbers that can be
> represented
On Feb 24, 6:35 pm, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> I understand that a Python integer can run to infinity. Quite how the
> illustrious rr manages to test for the length of a string that's already
> used all of the memory on his system has baffled me,
When did i ever say that i would need a string who's
On Feb 25, 11:54 am, MRAB wrote:
> [...]
> That should be:
> if maxlength is not None and len(string) <= maxlength:
Using "imaginary" infinity values defiles the intuitive nature of your
code. What is more intuitive?
def confine_length(string, maxlength=INFINITY):
if string.length < maxlengt
On Feb 24, 7:50 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> But it would also be rejected, and rightly so, as unnecessary complexity
> for the int type. There are already Decimal and float infinities, just
> use one of them.
Sure there are float INFINITIES that work fine for ints and floats,
but where is the c
On 2/25/2012 12:56 PM, Tobiah wrote:
It seems to me that there are a great many real numbers that can be
represented exactly by floating point numbers. The number 1 is an
example.
Binary floats can represent and integer and any fraction with a
denominator of 2**n within certain ranges. For de
>>> (2.0).hex()
'0x1.0p+1'
>>> (4.0).hex()
'0x1.0p+2'
>>> (1.5).hex()
'0x1.8p+0'
>>> (1.1).hex()
'0x1.1999ap+0'
>>>
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Has anyone here looked at Udacity's open CS101 course
(http://www.udacity.com/overview/Course/cs101) that started this week? The goal
of the seven week course is to build a web crawler.
So far, I'm not impressed with the speed or content of the course. I was
wondering what anyone here may think
>> I read through the python-dev archives and found the fundamental problem is
>> no one maintains asnycore / asynchat.
>
> Well, actually I do/did.
ah OK. I had read this comment from a few years back:
"IIRC, there was a threat to remove asyncore because there were no
maintainers, no one was fix
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:25:37 -0800, jmfauth wrote:
(2.0).hex()
> '0x1.0p+1'
(4.0).hex()
> '0x1.0p+2'
(1.5).hex()
> '0x1.8p+0'
(1.1).hex()
> '0x1.1999ap+0'
> jmf
What's your point? I'm afraid my crystal ball is out of order
Hello,
On Lion and with its stock python version 2.7.1 r271:86832,
webbrowser.open('file://localhost/nonexistingfile') always opens up
Safari. Is this a bug?
Leo
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Tim Wintle wrote:
> > It seems to me that there are a great many real numbers that can be
> > represented exactly by floating point numbers. The number 1 is an
> > example.
> >
> > I suppose that if you divide that count by the infinite count of all
> > real numb
If Safari is your default browser, Python will open the address in Safari.
>From the Python docs:
webbrowser.open(url[, new=0[, autoraise=True]])
Display url using the default browser. If new is 0, the url is opened in
the same browser window if possible. If new is 1, a new browser window is
ope
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:33:15 +0800, Leo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Lion and with its stock python version 2.7.1 r271:86832,
> webbrowser.open('file://localhost/nonexistingfile') always opens up
> Safari. Is this a bug?
What part of this do you think is the bug, and why? What part of the
behaviour a
On 2/25/2012 9:49 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
What this boils down to is to say that, basically by definition, the
set of numbers representable in some finite number of binary digits is
countable (just count up in binary value). But the whole of the real
numbers are uncountable. The hard part i
On 2012-02-26 11:36 +0800, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> What part of this do you think is the bug, and why? What part of the
> behaviour actually experienced contradicts the documented behaviour of
> webbrowser.open()?
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/webbrowser.html
If you have the default browse
On 26Feb2012 14:23, Leo wrote:
| On 2012-02-26 11:36 +0800, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
| > What part of this do you think is the bug, and why? What part of the
| > behaviour actually experienced contradicts the documented behaviour of
| > webbrowser.open()?
| >
| > http://docs.python.org/library/web
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:23:43 +0800, Leo wrote:
> On 2012-02-26 11:36 +0800, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> What part of this do you think is the bug, and why? What part of the
>> behaviour actually experienced contradicts the documented behaviour of
>> webbrowser.open()?
>>
>> http://docs.python.org/li
On 2012-02-26 15:04 +0800, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On the suppostion that "the default browser" is actually multiple
> settings, one for each of several URL (URI?) schemes, what do these two
> shell commands do for you? From a shell prompt in a Terminal:
>
> open file://localhost/nonexistingfile
26 matches
Mail list logo
