On Jun 5, 11:46 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> mik...@gmail.com schrieb:
>
> > As every one related to security probably knows, Rivest (and his
> > friends) have a new hashing algorithm which is supposed to have none
> > of the weaknesses of MD5 (and as a side benefit - not too many rainbow
> > tab
On Jun 4, 9:46 am, Xah Lee wrote:
> Of interest:
>
> • Why Must Software Be Rewritten For Multi-Core Processors?
> http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/multi-core_software.html
>
> plain text version follows.
>
> --
> Why Must Software Be Rewritt
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message <77as23f1fhj3...@mid.uni-berlin.de>, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
But reduce()? I can't see how you can parallelize reduce(). By its
nature, it has to run sequentially: it can't operate on the nth item
until it is operated on the (n-1)th item.
That depends on t
On 2009-06-05 16:09, mik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 11:46 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
mik...@gmail.com schrieb:
As every one related to security probably knows, Rivest (and his
friends) have a new hashing algorithm which is supposed to have none
of the weaknesses of MD5 (and as a side bene
On Jun 5, 9:14 am, Nathaniel Rook wrote:
> Hello, all!
>
> I've recently encountered a bug in NumPy's string arrays, where the 00
> ASCII character ('\x00') is not stored properly when put at the end of a
> string.
>
> For example:
>
> Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
> [GCC 4.2.3
Brian Quinlan wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't as precise as I should have been.
If you consider this example:
( for x in y)
I thought that every time that was evaluated, it would be done in
a new closure with x bound to the value of x at the time that the
closure was created.
Instead, a new closur
On Jun 4, 2:51 pm, "Ariel Vazquez Riveron"
wrote:
> Hola:
> Hoy en día me encuentro iniciandome dentro del python, en estos
> momentos quiero saber de que forma puedo eliminar un archivo de un
> compactado, ya sea zip, rar o cualquier otro. Estudie las librerías
> zipfile pero no tiene nin
Mark Tolonen 写道:
"willgun" wrote in message
news:h08c5e$au...@news.cn99.com...
By the way ,what does 'best regards' means at the end of a mail?
I think 恭祝 may be a good translation.
-Mark
O(∩_∩)O谢谢
Glad to meet a foreigner know Chinese, :-) .
But in my opinion,恭祝 means congratulation,wh
Gabriel Genellina 写道:
En Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:14:18 -0300, willgun escribió:
I'm a student from China.It's painful for us to read python
documentation entirely due to poor english.So I often make these
mistakes.
Try "chinese python group" at Google - I see some promising results at
least...
On Jun 5, 5:50 am, kj wrote:
> Hi. I need to implement, within a Python script, the same
> functionality as that of Unix's
>
> grep -rl some_string some_directory
>
> I.e. find all the files under some_directory that contain the string
> "some_string".
snip
The 'mmap.mmap' class has a 'find'
Christian Heimes wrote:
mik...@gmail.com schrieb:
As every one related to security probably knows, Rivest (and his
friends) have a new hashing algorithm which is supposed to have none
of the weaknesses of MD5 (and as a side benefit - not too many rainbow
tables yet). His code if publicly availab
Robert Kern wrote:
On 2009-06-05 16:09, mik...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not that I need it, I can sure use it. I can also write a wrapper
myself.
My secret agenda is too see if other people want it and write it as an
addition to the standard lib, thus wetting my feet in Python Core
Development wi
Thanks for the responses. I've tried the same script on a Server 2003
install, and Python 2.5 and it ran without a hitch. So, it's either a
problem with Python 2.6 or with Windows 7.
Thanks for all the responses. You've been great.
Best,
Jonathan
On Jun 5, 7:39 am, Jonathan Nelson wrote:
> I
Terry Reedy schrieb:
> Christian Heimes wrote:
>> mik...@gmail.com schrieb:
>>> As every one related to security probably knows, Rivest (and his
>>> friends) have a new hashing algorithm which is supposed to have none
>>> of the weaknesses of MD5 (and as a side benefit - not too many rainbow
>>> ta
Terry Reedy wrote:
> A wrapper could go on PyPI now so it can be tested in use *before* going
> in the stdlib. No commit or pre-review needed either.
Here you go http://pypi.python.org/pypi/md6
It's still a bit rough, totally untested but it should work.
Christian
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
In article ,
Christian Heimes wrote:
>Terry Reedy schrieb:
>> Christian Heimes wrote:
>>>
>>> Somebody has to write and add a md6 wrapper to the standard library.
>>> It's going to take some time, at least 18 months until Python 2.8 and
>>
>> 2.7 is next
>
>2.7rc1 is already out. There is no wa
Christian Heimes wrote:
...
2.7rc1 is already out. There is no way a new piece of code will land in
the 2.7 release.
Christian
3.1rc1 is out, but 2.7 is not even in alpha.
See pep 373 for the 2.7 schedule; 3.1's schedule is on pep 375.
--Scott David Daniels
scott.dani...@acm.org
--
http://ma
Aahz wrote:
> Um, what? You mean 3.1rc1, right? Nevertheless, my understanding is
> that 2.7 is mostly restricted to code landed in 3.1, so your second
> statement is roughly correct.
Oh, d...! Of course you are right, Aahz. As far as I can remember 2.7
will only contain backports of 3.1 feature
Aahz wrote:
Um, what? You mean 3.1rc1, right? Nevertheless, my understanding is
that 2.7 is mostly restricted to code landed in 3.1, so your second
statement is roughly correct.
My understanding is that 2.7 will come out about the same time as 3.2
and will contain 3.2 backports also. New f
On Jun 6, 1:26 am, Roedy Green
wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:15:00 + (UTC), Kaz Kylheku
> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who
> said :
>
> >Even for problems where it appears trivial, there can be hidden
> >issues, like false cache coherency communication where no actual
> >sharin
On Jun 5, 10:31 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Robert Dailey wrote:
> > On Jun 5, 3:47 am, "Gabriel Genellina" wrote:
> >> En Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:42:29 -0300, Robert Dailey
> >> escribió:
>
> >> > Hey guys, try using urlretrieve() in Python 3.0.1 on the following
> >> > URL:
>
> >> >
On Jun 6, 12:06 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Brian Quinlan wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I wasn't as precise as I should have been.
>
> > If you consider this example:
> > ( for x in y)
>
> > I thought that every time that was evaluated, it would be done in
> > a new closure with x bound to the value of x at t
>> http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Main_Page
>> http://en.literateprograms.org/LiteratePrograms:Welcome
>> http://www.codecodex.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
>> http://merd.sourceforge.net/pixel/language-study/scripting-language/
>> http://pleac.sourceforge.net/
>> htt
On Jun 5, 7:53 pm, Robert Dailey wrote:
> On Jun 5, 10:31 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Robert Dailey wrote:
> > > On Jun 5, 3:47 am, "Gabriel Genellina" wrote:
> > >> En Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:42:29 -0300, Robert Dailey
> > >> escribió:
>
> > >> > Hey guys, try using urlr
You could use locals() for dynamic variable names creation.
Additionally, you can give to Mayavi a try for visualization of your data:
http://code.enthought.com/projects/mayavi/
Gökhan
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Philip Gröger wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to create multiple variables (lets say
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Gökhan SEVER wrote:
> You could use locals() for dynamic variable names creation.
Not really. Quoting
http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html#locals (emphasis mine):
locals()
Update and return a dictionary representing the current local symbol table.
Is it possible to create an object in Python that will clean itself up
at function exit? I realize destruction of objects may not occur
immediately and can be garbage collected, but this functionality would
still be great to have. Consider the following function:
def do_stuff():
foo = scope_ob
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
> Is it possible to create an object in Python that will clean itself up
> at function exit? I realize destruction of objects may not occur
> immediately and can be garbage collected, but this functionality would
> still be great to have. Consi
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
> Is it possible to create an object in Python that will clean itself up
> at function exit? I realize destruction of objects may not occur
> immediately and can be garbage collected, but this functionality would
> still be great to have. Conside
Robert Dailey wrote:
This URL isn't even valid, can't believe I didn't get an exception!
My guess is that if you look at the data it
downloaded, you'll find it's a 404 response
page or something similar.
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:47:21 +0200, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>> A wrapper could go on PyPI now so it can be tested in use *before*
>> going in the stdlib. No commit or pre-review needed either.
>
> Here you go http://pypi.python.org/pypi/md6
>
> It's still a bit rough, total
On Jun 6, 5:45 am, Chris Rebert wrote:
> PLEAC (Programming Language Examples Alike Cookbook) is one
> option:http://pleac.sourceforge.net/
"""The latest version of Python is 2.4"""
Appears to be a translation of parts of the Perl Cookbook: """Examples
which translate the original Perl closely
command@alexbbs.twbbs.org wrote:
i have try [ [] for x in xrange(2**25) ]
Are you really going to be adding data to all
of those sublists?
If you're only using them sparsely, it may be
better to use a dictionary in place of the
top level list, and only add sublists as and
when necessary.
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:37:49 -0700, Minesh Patel wrote:
>> def chain(*args):
>> return (item for seq in args for item in seq)
>>
>> for x in chain(list_a, list_b):
>> foo(x)
>> --
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>
>>
> If they are the same length, you can try the zip bu
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:37:25 +0200, Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> "kj" wrote:
>>
>> Hi. I need to implement, within a Python script, the same
>> functionality as that of Unix's
>>
>>grep -rl some_string some_directory
>>
>> I.e. find all the files under some_directory that contain the strin
En Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:04:37 -0300, pataphor escribió:
But what is simple? I am currently working on a universal feature
creeper that could replace itertools.cycle, itertools.repeat,
itertools.chain and reverse and also helps to severely cut down on
itertools.islice usage. All within virtually
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:21:40 -0300, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> En Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:04:37 -0300, pataphor
> escribió:
>
>> But what is simple? I am currently working on a universal feature
>> creeper that could replace itertools.cycle, itertools.repeat,
>> itertools.chain and reverse and also
En Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:46:25 -0300, <""Michel Claveau -
MVP"> escribió:
Suppose that the (web) site give the file only after several seconds,
and after the user click a confirm (example: RapidFile).
Suppose that the (web) site give the file only after the user input a
code, controled by a
On Jun 4, 6:44 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" wrote:
> En Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:37:45 -0300, pataphor escribió:
>
> > So here is my proposed suggestion for a once and for all reconciliation
> > of various functions in itertools that can not stand on their own and
> > keep a straight face. Because of backw
On Jun 5, 9:07 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
> > Is it possible to create an object in Python that will clean itself up
> > at function exit? I realize destruction of objects may not occur
> > immediately and can be garbage collected, but this funct
On Jun 6, 5:16 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:47:21 +0200, Christian Heimes wrote:
> > Terry Reedy wrote:
> >> A wrapper could go on PyPI now so it can be tested in use *before*
> >> going in the stdlib. No commit or pre-review needed either.
>
> > Here you gohttp://pypi.pyth
En Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:33:04 -0300, Hendrik van Rooyen
escribió:
"Gabriel Genellina" wrote:
But if you already have a queue, you may put other objects there
(instead
of "canning" them). Testing the object type with isinstance(msg, str) is
pretty fast, and if you bind locally those names I
Hello,
I ran the following code (Using Debian 5.0)
from numpy import *
a = arange(1.,10.)
b = reshape(a, [3,3])
c = linalg.inv(b)
print b
print c
print dot(b,c)
print dot(c,b)
And the result is
[[ 1. 2. 3.]
[ 4. 5. 6.]
[ 7. 8. 9.]]
[[ 3.15221191e+15 -6.30442381e+15 3.15221191e+15]
[
On Jun 5, 8:56 pm, Robert Dailey wrote:
> Is it possible to create an object in Python that will clean itself up
> at function exit? I realize destruction of objects may not occur
> immediately and can be garbage collected, but this functionality would
> still be great to have. Consider the follow
En Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:04:45 -0300, Frederick Reeve
escribió:
I have sent this message to the authors as well as to this list. If
this is the wrong list please let me know where I should be sending
it... dev perhaps?
I think the best place is the bug tracker: http://bugs.python.org/
--
Gabr
In message
, joep
wrote:
> Is there a way to ban spammers from pypi?
Yes, but it doesn't work.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
