Re: Python for amd64 and mingw-w64

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:30 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> - Any extension requires the MS_WIN64 to be defined, but this symbol >> is only defined for MS compiler (in PC/pyport.h). > > Why do you say that? It is only defined when _WIN64 is defined; this > has nothing to do with a MS compiler. >

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:15 PM, r wrote: > On Dec 20, 11:11 pm, walterbyrd wrote: >> On Dec 20, 5:05 pm, Roy Smith >> >> > He got really hung up on the % syntax. >> >> I guess it's good to know that there is, at least, one person in the >> world doesn't like the % formatting. As least the move

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:15:23 -0800, r wrote: > It would be nice to get a vote together and see what does the average > pythoneer want? What do they like, What do they dislike. What is the > state of the Python Union? Does anybody know, Does anybody care? I think > python is slipping away from it's

Re: Python for amd64 and mingw-w64

> This is the only problem on python side of things to make extensions > buildable on windows x64 (all the other problems I have encountered so > far to make numpy build with mingw-w64 are numpy's or mingw-w64). Thanks! Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:27:43 -0800, walterbyrd wrote: > On Dec 19, 10:25 am, Michael Torrie wrote: > >> Personally the new string formatter is sorely needed in Python. > > Really? You know, it's funny, but when I read problems that people have > with python, I don't remember seeing that. Loads

Re: Python is slow

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:18:40 -0800, cm_gui wrote: >> Seriously cm_gui, you're a fool. >> Python is not slow. > > haha, getting hostile? > python fans sure are a nasty crowd. > > Python is SLOW. > > when i have the time, i will elaborate on this. You are not fast enough to elaborate on Python's

Re: linecache vs egg - reading line of a file in an egg

Robert Kern writes: > R. Bernstein wrote: >> Does linecache work with source in Python eggs? If not, is it >> contemplated that this is going to be fixed or is there something else >> like linecache that currently works? > > linecache works with eggs and other zipped Python source, but it had > t

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:57:46 -0800, Patrick Mullen wrote: > 2) In my experience, major version changes tend to be slower than > before. When a lot of things change, especially if very low-level > things change, as happened in python 3.0, the new code has not yet went > through many years of revis

Re: trapping all method calls in a class...

On Dec 21, 1:32 am, "Chris Rebert" wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Piyush Anonymous > > wrote: > > hi, > > i need to trap all method calls in a class in order to update a counter > > which is increased whenever a method is called and decreased whenever method > > returns. in order to t

Re: How to transfer data structure or class from Python to C/C++?

On Oct 16, 9:10 am, Hongtian wrote: snip > Not exactly. > In my C/C++ application, I have following function or flow: > void func1() > { > call PyFunc(struct Tdemo, struct &Tdemo1); > } > I mean I want to invoke Python function 'PyFunc' and transfer a data > structure 'Tdemo' to this fu

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 20, 8:26 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:55:35 -0800, Aaron Brady wrote: snip > > This behavior is currently legal: > > "%i %%i" % 0 % 1 > > '0 1' > > > So, just extend it.  (Unproduced.) > > "%i %i" % 0 % 1 > > '0 1' > > Errors should never pass silently, unle

Read an image from a URL and write it to the browser

I want to do something simple: read an image from an image URL and write the image to the browser in CGI style. I wrote a CGI script to do this (I'm new to Python) and got the following error: "FancyURLopener instance has no attribute 'tempcache'" in http://www.google.com/google_logo.jpg"; imgS

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 20, 8:49 pm, MRAB wrote: > Aaron Brady wrote: > > On Dec 20, 7:38 pm, Steven D'Aprano > cybersource.com.au> wrote: > >> Instead of just whinging, how about making a suggestion to fix it? Go on, > >> sit down for an hour or ten and try to work out how a BINARY OPERATOR > >> like % (that mea

RE: Best Practice using Glade/Python (ericericaro: message 1 of 20)

Hi Eric, Once the UI is defined, you interface to events as usual, e.g.: def OnSelChanged(self, evt): self.tablecont = str(self.GetItemText(evt.GetItem())) self.dprint(line()+". OnSelChanged:", self.tablecont) self.TreeViewController(self.tablecont) self.Bind(wx.EVT_TR

HMAC with RIPEMD-160

Is there any way of use HMAC with RIPEMD-160? Since that to create a ripemd-160 hash there is to use: h = hashlib.new('ripemd160') it looks that isn't possible For HMAC-SHA256 would be: - import hashlib import hmac hm = hmac.new('key', msg='message', digestmod=hashlib.sha256) ---

Re: Read an image from a URL and write it to the browser

McCoy Fan wrote: > I want to do something simple: read an image from an image URL and > write the image to the browser in CGI style. > > I wrote a CGI script to do this (I'm new to Python) and got the > following error: > > "FancyURLopener instance has no attribute 'tempcache'" in method FancyU

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Errors should never pass silently, unless explicitly silenced. You > have implicitly silenced the TypeError you get from not having enough > arguments for the first format operation. That means that you will > introduce ambiguity and bugs. > > "%i %i %i %i" % 5 % 3 %7

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:45:32 +, Duncan Booth wrote: > You seem to have made an unwarranted assumption, namely that a binary > operator has to compile to a function with two operands. There is no > particular reason why this has to always be the case: for example, I > believe that C# when given

Re: Read an image from a URL and write it to the browser

On Dec 21, 7:25 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote: > McCoy Fan wrote: > > I want to do something simple: read an image from an image URL and > > write the image to the browser in CGI style. > > > I wrote a CGI script to do this (I'm new to Python) and got the > > following error: > > > "Fanc

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:45:32 +, Duncan Booth wrote: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: > >> Errors should never pass silently, unless explicitly silenced. You have >> implicitly silenced the TypeError you get from not having enough >> arguments for the first format operation. That means that you will

www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.

Get Nike Shoes at Super Cheap Prices Discount Nike air jordans (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 90 Sneakers (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 91 Supplier (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 95 Shoes Supplier (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 97 Trainers (

Re: C API and memory allocation

Aaron Brady writes: > I hold this is strong enough to put the burden of proof on the > defenders of having 's'. What is its use case? Passing the string to a C API that can't handle (or don't care about) embedded null chars anyway. Filename API's are a typical example. -- http://mail.python.or

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

r wrote: > On Dec 20, 11:11 pm, walterbyrd wrote: >> On Dec 20, 5:05 pm, Roy Smith >> >>> He got really hung up on the % syntax. >> I guess it's good to know that there is, at least, one person in the >> world doesn't like the % formatting. As least the move was not >> entirely pointless. >> >> B

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Marc> Many newbie code I have seen avoids it by string concatenation: Marc> greeting = 'Hello, my name is ' + name + ' and I am ' + str(age) + ' old.' Marc> That's some kind of indirect complaint. :-) I see Python code like that written by people with a C/C++ background. I don't

Re: a small doubt

(answering to the OP) Piyush Anonymous wrote: i wrote this code -- class Person(object): instancesCount = 0 def __init__(self, title=""): Person.instancesCount += 1 self.id = "tempst" def testprint(self): print "blah blah" def __getattrib

Re: trapping all method calls in a class...

Chris Rebert a écrit : (snip) Sidenotes about your code: - `args` and `kwds` are the conventional names for the * and ** special arguments for '**', the most "conventional" names (at least the one I usually see) are 'kwargs', then 'kw' -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: >> a+b+c+d might execute a.__add__(b,c,d) allowing more efficient string >> concatenations or matrix operations, and a%b%c%d might execute as >> a.__mod__(b,c,d). > > But that needs special casing strings and ``%`` in the comiler, because > it might not be always

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> a+b+c+d might execute a.__add__(b,c,d) allowing more efficient string >> concatenations or matrix operations, and a%b%c%d might execute as >> a.__mod__(b,c,d). > > That's only plausible if the operations are associative. Addition is > associative, but string interpolat

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 21, 7:34 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:45:32 +, Duncan Booth wrote: > > You seem to have made an unwarranted assumption, namely that a binary > > operator has to compile to a function with two operands. There is no > > particular reason why this has to alw

Re: How to read stdout from subprocess as it is being produced

On Dec 19, 5:09 pm, Albert Hopkins wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 06:34 -0800, Alex wrote: > > Hi, > > > I have a Pyhon GUI application that launches subprocess. > > I would like to read the subprocess' stdout as it is being produced > > (show it in GUI), without hanging the GUI. > > > I guess thr

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 21, 8:50 am, Steve Holden wrote: > r wrote: snip > > This all really comes down to the new python users. Yea, i said it. > > Not rabid fanboys like Steven and myself.(i can't speak for walter but > > i think he would agree) Are we going to make sure joe-blow python > > newbie likes the lang

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Duncan Booth wrote: > I don't see that. What I suggested was that a % b % c would map to > a.__mod__(b,c). (a % b) % c would also map to that, but a % (b % c) could > only possibly map to a.__mod__(b.__mod__(c)) There's a compiling problem here, no? You don't want a%b%c to implement as a.__mod__

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:30:34 +, Duncan Booth wrote: > Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: > >>> a+b+c+d might execute a.__add__(b,c,d) allowing more efficient string >>> concatenations or matrix operations, and a%b%c%d might execute as >>> a.__mod__(b,c,d). >> >> But that needs special casing s

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 20, 8:49 pm, MRAB wrote: Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 20, 7:38 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Instead of just whinging, how about making a suggestion to fix it? Go on, sit down for an hour or ten and try to work out how a BINARY OPERATOR like % (that means it can only take

Re: Python is slow

Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:18:40 -0800, cm_gui wrote: Seriously cm_gui, you're a fool. Python is not slow. haha, getting hostile? python fans sure are a nasty crowd. Python is SLOW. when i have the time, i will elaborate on this. You are not fast enough to elabo

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 21, 10:31 am, MRAB wrote: > Aaron Brady wrote: > > On Dec 20, 8:49 pm, MRAB wrote: > >> Aaron Brady wrote: > >>> On Dec 20, 7:38 pm, Steven D'Aprano >>> cybersource.com.au> wrote: > Instead of just whinging, how about making a suggestion to fix it? Go on, > sit down for an hour

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 21, 10:31 am, MRAB wrote: Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 20, 8:49 pm, MRAB wrote: Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 20, 7:38 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Instead of just whinging, how about making a suggestion to fix it? Go on, sit down for an hour or ten and try to work out ho

Re: Python is slow

With my current experience with java, python and perl, I can only suggest one thing to who ever feels that python or any language is slow. By the way there is only one language with is fastest and that is assembly. And with regards to python, I am writing pritty heavy duty applications right now. J

Re: Python is slow

RTFM, use as much python code and optimize with C where needed, problem solved! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

MRAB: > Interesting. The re module uses a form of bytecode. Not sure about the > relative cost of the dispatch code, though. I was talking about the main CPython VM, but the same ideas may be adapted for the RE engine too. Bye, bearophile -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python is slow

On Dec 21, 2:34 pm, r wrote: > RTFM, use as much python code and optimize with C where needed, > problem solved! That's true if your *really* need C's extra speed. Most of the times, a better algorithm or psyco (or shedskin) can help without having to use any other language. This is unless you ar

Twisted for non-networking applications

Hi all, Is it a good idea to use Twisted inside my application, even though it has no networking part in it? Basically, my application needs lots of parallel processing - but I am rather averse to using threads - due to myraid issues it can cause. So, I was hoping to use a reactor pattern to

Re: Python is slow

Could not have said it better myself Luis, i stay as far away from C as i can. But there are usage cases for it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Are python objects thread-safe?

Say, I have two threads, updating the same dictionary object - but for different parameters: Please find an example below: a = {file1Data : '', file2Data : ''} Now, I send it to two different threads, both of which are looping infinitely: In thread1: a['file1Data'] = open(filename1).read

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Patrick Mullen schrieb: > 2) In my experience, major version changes tend to be slower than > before. When a lot of things change, especially if very low-level > things change, as happened in python 3.0, the new code has not yet > went through many years of revision and optimization that the old c

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

I noticed when i mentioned "self" nobody wants to touch that subject. There could be many reasons why... 0.) nobody but the 10 regulars i see here exists 1.) nobody cares(doubt it) 2.) nobody is brave enough to question it(maybe) 3.) most people like to type self over and over again(doubt it) 4.)

Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

Hi I'd like to rewrite a Web 2.0 PHP application in Python with AJAX, and it seems like Django and Turbogears are the frameworks that have the most momentum. I'd like to use this opportunity to lower the load on servers, as the PHP application wasn't built to fit the number of users hammering the

Re: Removing self.

r> I do not like self, and i lamented it from day one, now it is second r> nature to me but does that mean it is really needed?? I feel i have r> been brainwashed into its usage. ... r> 3000 would have been the perfect time to dump self and really clean up r> the language

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Quoting r : > I noticed when i mentioned "self" nobody wants to touch that subject. > There could be many reasons why... > > 0.) nobody but the 10 regulars i see here exists > 1.) nobody cares(doubt it) > 2.) nobody is brave enough to question it(maybe) > 3.) most people like to type self over a

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

r wrote: I noticed when i mentioned "self" nobody wants to touch that subject. There could be many reasons why... 0.) nobody but the 10 regulars i see here exists 1.) nobody cares(doubt it) 2.) nobody is brave enough to question it(maybe) 3.) most people like to type self over and over again(dou

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:26 AM, r wrote: > I noticed when i mentioned "self" nobody wants to touch that subject. > There could be many reasons why... > > 0.) nobody but the 10 regulars i see here exists > 1.) nobody cares(doubt it) > 2.) nobody is brave enough to question it(maybe) > 3.) most pe

Re: Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Gilles Ganault wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to rewrite a Web 2.0 PHP application in Python with AJAX, and > it seems like Django and Turbogears are the frameworks that have the > most momentum. > > I'd like to use this opportunity to lower the load on servers, as the

Re: Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

On Dec 21, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Gilles Ganault wrote: Hi I'd like to rewrite a Web 2.0 PHP application in Python with AJAX, and it seems like Django and Turbogears are the frameworks that have the most momentum. I don't have any practical experience with these, but I've done some research. My

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

r a écrit : (snip clueless rant) One more big complaint "THE BACKSLASH PLAGUE". ever tried regexp? Yes. exp = re.compile(r"no \problem \with \backslashes") , or file paths?. You mean _dos/windows_ file path separator ? It was indeed a stupid choice _from microsoft_ to choose the by then

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

walterbyrd a écrit : On Dec 20, 5:05 pm, Roy Smith He got really hung up on the % syntax. I guess it's good to know that there is, at least, one person in the world doesn't like the % formatting. As least the move was not entirely pointless. But, you must admit, of all the things people com

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

r a écrit : I noticed when i mentioned "self" nobody wants to touch that subject. There could be many reasons why... 0.) nobody but the 10 regulars i see here exists 1.) nobody cares(doubt it) 2.) nobody is brave enough to question it(maybe) 3.) most people like to type self over and over again(

Re: trapping all method calls in a class...

The decorate_meths() function as given fails: TypeError: 'dictproxy' object does not support item assignment But this version avoids that error (on Python 2.2 thru 2.6): def decorate_meths(klass): for nam, val in klass.__dict__.items(): if callable(val): setattr(klass,

Re: Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

Gilles Ganault a écrit : Hi I'd like to rewrite a Web 2.0 PHP application in Python with AJAX, and it seems like Django and Turbogears are the frameworks that have the most momentum. I'd like to use this opportunity to lower the load on servers, as the PHP application wasn't built to fit the nu

Re: Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

Philip Semanchuk a écrit : (snip) From the reading I did, I gathered that Django was really good if you want to do what Django is good at, but not as easy to customize as, say, Pylons. That was my first impression too, and was more or less true some years ago. After more experience, having g

Re: Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

On Dec 21, 2008, at 3:14 PM, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: Philip Semanchuk a écrit : (snip) From the reading I did, I gathered that Django was really good if you want to do what Django is good at, but not as easy to customize as, say, Pylons. That was my first impression too, and was more o

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Hey Bruno, Thanks for spelling it out for me :D -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

wxpython for python 3.0 ?

The wxpython web describes compatability with python 2.4 & 2.5 . Does it work with 3.0 ? If not, anyone have a clue as to when ? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

noob trouble with IDLE

Hi, Im new to python and I've just started using Byte of Python, running the samples etc. Im using IDLE on Xp. Ok, here's the thing. A sample script makes a call to the os.system() function in order to zip some files. Everything works fine when running from the command line, but the same code fails

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Bruno, I thought i had already gone up, up, and away to your kill filter. hmm, guess you had a change of heart ;D -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python is slow

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:47 AM, r wrote: > Could not have said it better myself Luis, i stay as far away from C > as i can. But there are usage cases for it. If you can think of 1 typical common case I'll reward you with praise! :) By the way, by common and typical I mean use-cases that you'd t

Re: Twisted for non-networking applications

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Kottiyath wrote: > Hi all, > Is it a good idea to use Twisted inside my application, even though > it has no networking part in it? > Basically, my application needs lots of parallel processing - but I > am rather averse to using threads - due to myraid issues

Re: Are python objects thread-safe?

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:51 AM, RajNewbie wrote: > Say, I have two threads, updating the same dictionary object - but for > different parameters: > Please find an example below: > a = {file1Data : '', > file2Data : ''} > > Now, I send it to two different threads, both of which are looping >

Re: [Help] The pywinauto Can't select the MDI's menu using the MenuItems() which return [].

--- El vie 19-dic-08, 为爱而生 escribió: > I use the WORD Only for my example. > The application I test is similar to the WORD and It > has't the COM. The code below opens the Choose Font dialog on my Spanish Windows version: py> from pywinauto.application import Application py> app = Application.s

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:26 PM, r wrote: > I noticed when i mentioned "self" nobody wants to touch that subject. > There could be many reasons why... > > 0.) nobody but the 10 regulars i see here exists if you only see 10 people, you must not be following this list very well. > > 1.) nobody

Re: wxpython for python 3.0 ?

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:42 PM, wrote: > The wxpython web describes compatability with python 2.4 & 2.5 . > Does it work with 3.0 ? If not, anyone have a clue as to when ? This question was asked a couple of times on the wxpython-users mailing list. It's probably going to take a while. For n

Re: Are python objects thread-safe?

On Dec 21, 12:51 pm, RajNewbie wrote: > Say, I have two threads, updating the same dictionary object - but for > different parameters: > Please find an example below: > a = {file1Data : '', >        file2Data : ''} > > Now, I send it to two different threads, both of which are looping > infinitely

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 21, 10:58 am, MRAB wrote: > Aaron Brady wrote: > > On Dec 21, 10:31 am, MRAB wrote: snip > >> The original format is a string. The result of '%' is a string if > >> there's only 1 placeholder to fill, or a (partial) format object (class > >> "Format"?) if there's more than one. Similarly,

Re: HMAC with RIPEMD-160

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Kless wrote: > Is there any way of use HMAC with RIPEMD-160? > > Since that to create a ripemd-160 hash there is to use: >h = hashlib.new('ripemd160') > it looks that isn't possible > > For HMAC-SHA256 would be: > - > import hashlib > import hmac > > hm

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 21, 10:58 am, MRAB wrote: Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 21, 10:31 am, MRAB wrote: snip The original format is a string. The result of '%' is a string if there's only 1 placeholder to fill, or a (partial) format object (class "Format"?) if there's more than one. Similar

Beep

I use sys.stdout.write('\a') to beep. It works fine on Kubuntu, but not on two other platforms (one of which is Ubuntu). I presume that the problem is due to a system configuration issue. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks. -- Jeffrey Barish -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/

Re: Beep

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Jeffrey Barish wrote: > I use sys.stdout.write('\a') to beep. It works fine on Kubuntu, but not on > two other platforms (one of which is Ubuntu). I presume that the problem > is due to a system configuration issue. Can someone point me in the right > direction?

Re: Beep

Jeffrey Barish wrote: I use sys.stdout.write('\a') to beep. It works fine on Kubuntu, but not on two other platforms (one of which is Ubuntu). I presume that the problem is due to a system configuration issue. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks. I started a thread about t

Re: Beep

Chris Rebert wrote: > > Is the 'pcspkr' kernel module built and loaded? Yes. And I should have mentioned that I get sound from Ubuntu applications that produce sound. -- Jeffrey Barish -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 21, 10:11 am, r wrote: > Most of the complaints i hear are the redundant use of self. > Which I lamented about but have become accustom(brainwashed) to it. I > would remove this if it where up to me. It's a shame Python wasn't released under some kind of license, one that allowed its sourc

Threads, forks, multiplexing - oh my

I have a program that was created by someone else and it does it's job beautifully. I now want to run multiple instances of this program on a client, after receiving the command line and args from a broker, dispatcher, whatever you want to call it. This dispatcher will listen for a connecti

Re: Read an image from a URL and write it to the browser

McCoy Fan wrote: > On Dec 21, 7:25 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote: >> McCoy Fan wrote: >>> I want to do something simple: read an image from an image URL and >>> write the image to the browser in CGI style. >>> I wrote a CGI script to do this (I'm new to Python) and got the >>> following

Re: Threads, forks, multiplexing - oh my

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Thomas Raef wrote: > I now want to run multiple instances of this program on a client, after > receiving the command line and args from a broker, dispatcher, whatever you > want to call it. You can use the subprocess module. > I've read where forks will run prog

Re: Namespaces, multiple assignments, and exec()

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, John O'Hagan wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Terry Reedy wrote: > > John O'Hagan wrote: > > > I have a lot of repetitive assignments to make, within a generator, > > > that use a function outside the generator: > > > > > > var1 = func("var1", args) > > > var2 = func("var2", args)

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:37 AM, alex23 wrote: > On Dec 21, 10:11 am, r wrote: >> Most of the complaints i hear are the redundant use of self. >> Which I lamented about but have become accustom(brainwashed) to it. I >> would remove this if it where up to me. > > It's a shame Python wasn't releas

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

On Dec 21, 6:14 pm, MRAB wrote: > Aaron Brady wrote: > > On Dec 21, 10:58 am, MRAB wrote: > >> Aaron Brady wrote: > >>> On Dec 21, 10:31 am, MRAB wrote: > > snip > The original format is a string. The result of '%' is a string if > there's only 1 placeholder to fill, or a (partial) for

How to represent a sequence of raw bytes

Hi, What's the right type to represent a sequence of raw bytes. In C, we usually do 1. char buf[200] or 2. char buf[] = {0x11, 0x22, 0x33, ... } What's the equivalent representation for above in Python? Thanks. - narke -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: How to represent a sequence of raw bytes

On Monday 22 December 2008 03:23:03 Steven Woody wrote: > 2. char buf[] = {0x11, 0x22, 0x33, ... } > > What's the equivalent representation for above in Python? >>> buf="\x11\x22\33" >>> for b in buf: print ord(b) ... 17 34 27 >>> Greetings, -- "The ability of the OSS process to collect and

Re: New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?

Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 21, 6:14 pm, MRAB wrote: Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 21, 10:58 am, MRAB wrote: Aaron Brady wrote: On Dec 21, 10:31 am, MRAB wrote: snip The original format is a string. The result of '%' is a string if there's only 1 placeholder to fill, or a (partial) format obje

Re: Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

Gilles Ganault writes: > Hi > > I'd like to rewrite a Web 2.0 PHP application in Python with AJAX, and > it seems like Django and Turbogears are the frameworks that have the > most momentum. > > I'd like to use this opportunity to lower the load on servers, as the > PHP application wasn't built t

www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.

Get Nike Shoes at Super Cheap Prices Discount Nike air jordans (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 90 Sneakers (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 91 Supplier (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 95 Shoes Supplier (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 97 Trainers (

www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.

Get Nike Shoes at Super Cheap Prices Discount Nike air jordans (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 90 Sneakers (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 91 Supplier (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 95 Shoes Supplier (www.iofferkicks.com) Discount Nike Air Max 97 Trainers (

Re: Twisted for non-networking applications

On Dec 22, 3:26 am, "James Mills" wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Kottiyath wrote: > > Hi all, > >   Is it a good idea to use Twisted inside my application, even though > > it has no networking part in it? > >   Basically, my application needs lots of parallel processing - but I > > am

Discount (paypal) www.ebuyvip.com nfl jersey ugg boots

Hi friend Thanks for your reply. The current stock list with the available jerseys and sizea in the add annex, pls check it. and the jerseys pictures you can check my ablum : http://likenfl.photo.163.com . the moq order: 10 pcs the price : $20 inc shipping fee and tax.If you worry do businees

Re: Twisted for non-networking applications

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:25 PM, RajNewbie wrote: > I was unable to see documentation explaining this - so asking again. Documentation is available here: http://trac.softcircuit.com.au/circuits/wiki/docs And here: pydoc circuits The code itself is heavily documented. I'm still writing better onl

Re: Are Django/Turbogears too specific?

Philip Semanchuk wrote: ... I prefer Mako over the other template languages I've seen. From what I can tell Mako is nearly identical to all other template languages you might have seen (e.g. PHP style tags). Thats why I personally would not consider it. Its just much of a hassle to mix code an

Re: How to represent a sequence of raw bytes

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Michiel Overtoom wrote: > On Monday 22 December 2008 03:23:03 Steven Woody wrote: > >> 2. char buf[] = {0x11, 0x22, 0x33, ... } >> >> What's the equivalent representation for above in Python? > buf="\x11\x22\33" for b in buf: print ord(b) > ... > 17 > 3

Re: How to represent a sequence of raw bytes

Steven Woody wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Michiel Overtoom wrote: On Monday 22 December 2008 03:23:03 Steven Woody wrote: 2. char buf[] = {0x11, 0x22, 0x33, ... } What's the equivalent representation for above in Python? buf="\x11\x22\33" ... I thing "\x11\x22\x33" in python

Re: How to represent a sequence of raw bytes

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Steven Woody wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Michiel Overtoom wrote: >> On Monday 22 December 2008 03:23:03 Steven Woody wrote: >> >>> 2. char buf[] = {0x11, 0x22, 0x33, ... } >>> >>> What's the equivalent representation for above in Python? >> >

Re: How to represent a sequence of raw bytes

"Steven Woody" writes: > What's the right type to represent a sequence of raw bytes. In C, > we usually do > > 1. char buf[200] or > 2. char buf[] = {0x11, 0x22, 0x33, ... } > > What's the equivalent representation for above in Python? import array buf = array.array('b', [0x11, 0x22, ...])