On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:21 PM, John Nagle wrote:
> nobrowser wrote:
>>
>> Hi. The with statement is certainly nifty. The trouble is, the
>> *only* two documented examples how it can be used with the library
>> classes are file objects (which I use all the time) and thread locks
>> which I almo
nobrowser wrote:
Hi. The with statement is certainly nifty. The trouble is, the
*only* two documented examples how it can be used with the library
classes are file objects (which I use all the time) and thread locks
which I almost never use. Yet there are many, many classes in the
library whos
On 2/19/2010 2:18 AM, nobrowser wrote:
Hi. The with statement is certainly nifty. The trouble is, the
*only* two documented examples how it can be used with the library
classes are file objects (which I use all the time) and thread locks
which I almost never use. Yet there are many, many class
On 2010-02-19 01:18 AM, nobrowser wrote:
Hi. The with statement is certainly nifty. The trouble is, the
*only* two documented examples how it can be used with the library
classes are file objects (which I use all the time) and thread locks
which I almost never use. Yet there are many, many cla
nobrowser wrote:
> Yet there are many, many classes in the
> library whose use would be more elegant and readable if the with
> statement could be employed. Start with the connection objects in
> httplib and you can probably come up with 10 others easily. Maybe it
> is the case that some of thes
Hi. The with statement is certainly nifty. The trouble is, the
*only* two documented examples how it can be used with the library
classes are file objects (which I use all the time) and thread locks
which I almost never use. Yet there are many, many classes in the
library whose use would be more
