On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I don't think I'm going to be doing web2py anytime soon. :( But I
> was hoping it'd be a better alternative than Django for web
> development.
I'm no expert on Python web frameworks, but the only one that
I heard there was a presentation about web2py in my area tonight.
Trying to decide if I wanted to attend, I googled about web2py and
python3.
I was amazed by what I found. I've never seen a group so opposed to python3.
They make the old (and long-since lost) Solaris 2 wars seem tame.
I
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:13 PM, bruce wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I know this is a python list, but hoping that I can find someone to
> help get a base install of web2py running.
>
> I've got an older version of fedora, running py 2.6.4 running apache v2.2
>
> I'm simp
Hi.
I know this is a python list, but hoping that I can find someone to
help get a base install of web2py running.
I've got an older version of fedora, running py 2.6.4 running apache v2.2
I'm simply trying to get web2py up/running, and then to interface it
with apache, so that th
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Modulok wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > few months back I decided to adopt python for my all sort of work
> including
> > web programming...
> > --
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> >
>
> Pick Djan
> Hi everyone,
> few months back I decided to adopt python for my all sort of work including
> web programming...
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
Pick Django or web2py. You'll be happy with either. (I have no experience with
zope.)
They&#
> adopt out of django, zope and web2py.
> I am from php and drupal background. which framework would be better for
> me. I am open to learn anything, anything new. but I want to adopt best
> thing full of features and lot of plugins/extensions and easy to use and
> have bett
nd I have wasted long time deciding which to adopt out of
> django, zope and web2py.
> I am from php and drupal background. which framework would be better for me.
> I am open to learn anything, anything new. but I want to adopt best thing
> full of features and lot of plugins/ex
ut of
> django, zope and web2py.
> I am from php and drupal background. which framework would be better for me.
> I am open to learn anything, anything new. but I want to adopt best thing
> full of features and lot of plugins/extensions and easy to use and have
> better documenta
I am sorry by mistake I sent incomplete mail here is my mail.
Hi everyone,
few months back I decided to adopt python for my all sort of work including web
programming. and I have wasted long time deciding which to adopt out of django,
zope and web2py.
I am from php and drupal background. which
Hi everyone,
few months back I decided to adopt python for my all sort of work including web
progra
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 9, 12:47 pm, Vineet wrote:
> On Sep 9, 3:29 am, Paul Watson wrote:
>
> > I have read some of the talk around these two frameworks.
>
> > Would you say that web2py is more geared toward the enterprise?
>
> > Which one do you believe will be on Python 3
On Sep 9, 3:29 am, Paul Watson wrote:
> I have read some of the talk around these two frameworks.
>
> Would you say that web2py is more geared toward the enterprise?
>
> Which one do you believe will be on Python 3 more quickly?
Both Django & web2py are good frameworks.
I have
On Sep 9, 3:29 am, Paul Watson wrote:
> I have read some of the talk around these two frameworks.
>
> Would you say that web2py is more geared toward the enterprise?
>
> Which one do you believe will be on Python 3 more quickly?
Both Django & web2py are good frameworks.
I have
web2py is one of the most popular Web Frameworks. web2py has MVC
architecture, offering us excellent development efficiency and
extensibility. web2py is very suitable for Web application
development.
deck.js is a JavaScript library for making HTML5 presentation. It
supports keyboard navigation
I have read some of the talk around these two frameworks.
Would you say that web2py is more geared toward the enterprise?
Which one do you believe will be on Python 3 more quickly?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
& linkedin)
• Wall (+feed) for each group
• Listing of who's in which group
• PM group members
>>>--
I don't want to undermine django. It is a good framework.
But still, my advise would be to go for 'web2py'.
http://we
We have built Radbox.me on web2py and it's amazing..
> On Saturday, December 19, 2009 1:42 AM AppRe Godeck wrote:
> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> know it is been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> more intel
Some may find useful to compare:
- A Crash Course on Django
http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/django-crash-course
- A Crash Course on Web2py
http://www.web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/253
They basically describe the same app and the steps to built it. Sorry
I had not time to make
On Dec 21, 2:50 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> mdipierro a écrit :
...
> > This means you do not need to import
> > basic web2py symbols. They are already defined in the environment that
> > executes the models and controllers
>
> Ok. As far as I'm concerned :
On Dec 21, 2:32 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Thadeus Burgess a écrit :
> (snip)
>
> > Spend one
> > day working on a simple django application, polls, blog, image
> > gallery, family pet tree, you name it. Then take the next day, and
> > write the same applic
On Dec 19, 8:39 pm, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:48:07 -0800, Yarko wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
>
> It seems that this is the biggest issue surrounding web2py, from my
> research, is the ability to customize the defaults (the easy
> > On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> >> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> >> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> >> more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other
Anand Vaidya a écrit :
On Dec 19, 2:42 pm, AppRe Godeck wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Hi,
I am not very fam
mdipierro a écrit :
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Of course I am the most b
On Dec 20, 1:35 am, mdipierro wrote:
> Errata. I said "The dal supports transactions" where I meant "the dal
> supports migrations".
> Of course it also supports "transactions" as well as "distributed
> transactions".
Sorry, if this is not re
Thadeus Burgess a écrit :
(snip)
Spend one
day working on a simple django application, polls, blog, image
gallery, family pet tree, you name it. Then take the next day, and
write the same application with web2py, and you decide. In the end,
both are tools and you need to figure out what is best
AppRe Godeck a écrit :
(snip)
Thanks for your replies, I was hoping to hear from some django people as
well. Especially if you choose django over web2py, and why.
I don't know what a "django people" is - but if you mean "django core
developper", I'm not one of th
People seem to think that because web2py has a default for almost
everything (part of its design) than you must use the default.
- There is a web based IDE but you *can* use the shell instead (like
you do in Django)
- There are migrations but you *can* disable then (and it works like
Django that
> If all
> web2py offers is default views, then it may be good for proof of concept
> projects, however I can't see in my right mind, proofing an application,
> and then turning around to write it in django because more than the
> defaults is needed.
You *can* customize web
multiple database
connection to postgresq, mysql and/or firebird.
I think this is related to the topic because it is a distinctive
feature of web2py.
Massimo
On Dec 20, 1:32 pm, Lacrima wrote:
> On Dec 20, 1:35 am, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > Errata. I said "The dal supports transactions&qu
On Dec 19, 2:42 pm, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Hi,
I am not very familiar with
On Dec 19, 8:39 pm, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:48:07 -0800, Yarko wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> >> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> >> know it's been discussed on a flame war
> Why does web2py have classes that represent HTML? I can't see ever
> needing to write VIEW code in my controller, since thats what views are
> for.
You do not need to use but if, for example, you want to build a menu
recursively, having a server-side presentation of the DOM a
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:48:07 -0800, Yarko wrote:
> On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
>> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
>> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
>> more intellectual reasoni
Errata 2. Before people jump on me. I said "copyright" but I meant
"trademark". Of course web2py is GPL2 so everybody can copy and modify
it.
The license has an exception that basically treats the compiled web2py
as freeware.
The license does not extend to apps that require
On Dec 19, 1:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Hi! I come from a mvc framework b
rote:
>
> > Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> > know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> > more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
>
> Of course I am the most biased person in the w
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Of course I am the most biased
On Dec 19, 2:48 pm, Yarko wrote:
> On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
>
> > Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> > know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> > more intellectual reasoning
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Chevy or Ford? (or whatever pair
Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
x27;}}
>{{=form}}
>
>## in view default/data.html
>{{extend 'layout.html'}}
>{{=form}}
The above example is not (although stated) a complete app, even when
correcting the errors. No index action, no links to register, login,
etc, no functionality in the da
Hi Paul,
yes, the model designer is the one from Ondras. We modified it so that
it generates DAL (Database Abstraction Layer) code instead of SQL and
it is a work in progress.
Technically it is not pat of web2py and in fact it is not distributed
with it.
It is just one of the many web2py apps
On 22 Sep, 04:49, Steve Shephed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.web2py.comWeb2Py - Python Framework is the newest
> kid on the block for Python frameworks.
I'm not going to dwell on the merits of web2py, I'm afraid...
> It has a lot of features that simp
http://www.web2py.com Web2Py - Python Framework is the newest
kid on the block for Python frameworks.
It has a lot of features that simply are not there in other
frameworks. Even Ruby!. You can design database models graphically
online.
The templating language is pure python and there are no
web2py > django
mailing list:
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i cant find a web2py mailing list or forum, not by googling and not on
the web2py homepage.
(yes thats right im asking about web2py not webpy).
this framework seems great and i installed and it seems like all i
wished for.
easy to install, easy to use, fast, etc. just an overall better
48 matches
Mail list logo
