Terry Reedy said:
> Question 1: if you use the .pth method, do you get the same result?
(I expect you will, but good to
> check.)
Recompiled Pyhton 3.3 without the SITEPATH change. Same result:
> python3.3
Python 3.3.0a3 (default, May 8 2012, 19:57:45)
[GCC 4.6.3] on linux
Type "help", "cop
On 5/8/2012 3:13 PM, Edward C. Jones wrote:
I use up-to-date Debian testing (wheezy), amd64 architecture. I downloaded,
compiled and installed Python 3.3.0 alpha 3 (from python.org) using
"altinstall". Debian wheezy comes with python3.2 (and 2.6 and 2.7). I
installed the Debian package "python3-b
I use up-to-date Debian testing (wheezy), amd64 architecture. I downloaded,
compiled and installed Python 3.3.0 alpha 3 (from python.org) using
"altinstall". Debian wheezy comes with python3.2 (and 2.6 and 2.7). I
installed the Debian package "python3-bs4" (BeautifulSoup4 for Python3).
Note: De
On 9/6/2010 12:55 PM, Sal Lopez wrote:
The following code runs OK under 3.1:
@filename=cats_and_dogs.py
#!/usr/bin/python
def make_sound(animal):
print(animal + ' says ' + sounds[animal])
sounds = { "cat": "meow", "dog": "woof" }
for i in sounds.keys():
make_sound(i)
# output:
# d
On Sep 6, 5:55 pm, Sal Lopez wrote:
> The following code runs OK under 3.1:
>
> @filename=cats_and_dogs.py
>
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> def make_sound(animal):
> print(animal + ' says ' + sounds[animal])
>
> sounds = { "cat": "meow", "dog": "woof" }
>
> for i in sounds.keys():
> make_sound(i)
The following code runs OK under 3.1:
@filename=cats_and_dogs.py
#!/usr/bin/python
def make_sound(animal):
print(animal + ' says ' + sounds[animal])
sounds = { "cat": "meow", "dog": "woof" }
for i in sounds.keys():
make_sound(i)
# output:
# dog says woof
# cat says meow
When I move t
On Oct 27, 5:40 pm, Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It seems to me that deleting local instances before imported modules
> > would solve the problem. Is it not possible for the interpreter to get
> > this right? Or are there cases where this would break
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that deleting local instances before imported modules
would solve the problem. Is it not possible for the interpreter to get
this right? Or are there cases where this would break stuff.
It seems rather unpythonic for the __del__() method to become
unpredic
It seems to me that deleting local instances before imported modules
would solve the problem. Is it not possible for the interpreter to get
this right? Or are there cases where this would break stuff.
It seems rather unpythonic for the __del__() method to become
unpredictable at exit.
--
http://ma
This is expected behavior (see http://www.python.org/doc/essays/cleanup)
but it is definitely a wart of Python. The best advice I can give you
is *never* use __del__. There are alternatives,
such as the with statement, weak references or atexit.
See for instance http://code.activestate.com/recipes
Hi
i have i have a class that makes temp folders to do work in. it keeps
track of them, so that in the __del__() it can clean them up. ideally
if the user of the module still has objects left at the end of their
program, they should be automatically cleaned up. in my destructor i
had a call to shu
On 09/02/07, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Friday 9/2/2007 02:10, you wrote:
>
> Please keep posting on the list - you'll reach a whole lot of people
> there...
sorry, I had just hit the reply button and did not notice that
python-list was not there.
>my crystal ball I can see t
At Friday 9/2/2007 02:10, you wrote:
Please keep posting on the list - you'll reach a whole lot of people there...
On 09/02/07, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's a bit hard to tell from your description - would be better if you had
copied the exact error messages.
But the over
En Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:40:39 -0300, krishnakant Mane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I found a very strange kind of behaviour in python with my own package.
> I created a package in which there were 4 modules and one __init__.py
> file
> I created the entire project in eclipse (pydev).
> it wo
hello all,
I found a very strange kind of behaviour in python with my own package.
I created a package in which there were 4 modules and one __init__.py file
I created the entire project in eclipse (pydev).
it works fine there with the ide.
but now when I try running the code without eclipse, that
Hello all,
I'm trying to cross-compile Python and I've gotten the compilation
working, but I would like to disable many of the modules from building
or installing. I've read through the help in Modules/Setup and I see
how it can be used to override setup.py for specifying where things are,
but I
16 matches
Mail list logo
