On 8/23/2011 6:09 PM, Ronald Reynolds wrote:
What is recommended for upgrading python for windows? Do I just install
the new version
I put each version in its own Pythonxy directory, as the installer
wants. x.y.z bug fix releases replace the previous x.y release.
Do I edit my system path?
What is recommended for upgrading python for windows? Do I just install the new
versionDo I edit my system path? Should I uninstall the old version. Right now
I have 2.7 and3.1 and 3.2 and I keep editing my system path when I install a
new version but I'm notsure that's the right way to go.
On 5/18/2010 9:47 PM, Aahz wrote:
In article,
packet wrote:
Would it be safe to upgrade from python 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 without hurting
the 2.6.4?
Define "hurting". Generally speaking, it's always safe to upgrade a
point release, but you should replace the previous version.
The default action
In article ,
packet wrote:
>
>Would it be safe to upgrade from python 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 without hurting
>the 2.6.4?
Define "hurting". Generally speaking, it's always safe to upgrade a
point release, but you should replace the previous version.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*>
Would it be safe to upgrade from python 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 without hurting
the 2.6.4?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi!
If you are under Vista, or Windows 7, have you unactivate UAC, before
the update?
@+
MCI
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/05/2010 23:13, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
When will it install into system32?
When you install "for all users".
Did the upgrade inform you that it was an upgrade, or did it warn you
that you would overwrite the previous installation?
It warned me that there is a previous
> If we install over an existing version of Python 2.6.5, will our PTH
> files and site-packages be preserved?
>
> Or do we need to back out our 3rd party packages, install Python 2.6.5
> and then manually restore our 3rd party packages?
An upgrade installation will only replace the Python files,
On 5/11/2010 5:27 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Martin,
If we install over an existing version of Python 2.6.5, will our PTH
files and site-packages be preserved?
Or do we need to back out our 3rd party packages, install Python 2.6.5
and then manually restore our 3rd party packages?
In my exp
Martin,
If we install over an existing version of Python 2.6.5, will our PTH
files and site-packages be preserved?
Or do we need to back out our 3rd party packages, install Python 2.6.5
and then manually restore our 3rd party packages?
Thank you,
Malcolm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
> When will it install into system32?
When you install "for all users".
>> Did the upgrade inform you that it was an upgrade, or did it warn you
>> that you would overwrite the previous installation?
>>
> It warned me that there is a previous installation.
Hmm. You don't remember the exact m
Martin,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 10/05/2010 22:25, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
Just upgraded on my Windows 7 machine my copy of 2.6.4 to 2.6.5.
However doing sys.version still shows 2.6.4 even so python.exe is dated
19. March 2010 with a size of 26.624 bytes.
Is
Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
> Just upgraded on my Windows 7 machine my copy of 2.6.4 to 2.6.5.
>
> However doing sys.version still shows 2.6.4 even so python.exe is dated
> 19. March 2010 with a size of 26.624 bytes.
>
> Is this a known issue? Or did I do something wrong?
Look at the copy of python
Just upgraded on my Windows 7 machine my copy of 2.6.4 to 2.6.5.
However doing sys.version still shows 2.6.4 even so python.exe is dated
19. March 2010 with a size of 26.624 bytes.
Is this a known issue? Or did I do something wrong?
If I install to a new folder all is well, but I would have
On Mar 31, 3:07 am, 7stud wrote:
> On Mar 3, 4:01 am, Graham Dumpleton
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 3, 8:53 am, Rey Bango wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
> > > on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
> >
On Mar 3, 4:01 am, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
> On Mar 3, 8:53 am, Rey Bango wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
> > on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
> > in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding o
In article ,
Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>
>\begin{whine}
>
>Why is Python a "Framework" under "Libraries"? In any other Unix, a
>third-party Python installation would have been placed in /usr/local/
>or /opt/. Also, editing a user's dotfiles while installing software
>seems cruel and unusual -- to tha
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:47:51 +1100, Python Nutter wrote:
...
> PATH="/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/Current/bin:${PATH}"
> export PATH
...
> If you have ever looked at your Mac?s root directory and wondered what
> some of those other directories are for, you?re probably not alone.
>
On Mar 3, 8:53 am, Rey Bango wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
> on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
> in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding of the process.
>
> If I download the disk image installe
Wes James schrieb:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Rey Bango wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding of the process.
I'd recommend
from my .profile file in ~
# This file does not get executed because .bash_profile exists in the
home directory
# and that gets executed instead. If .bash_profile did not exist then
this file gets executed
# PN hand edit export PATH to process the most recently installed
Python Framework
# otherw
Thank you Robert. Since I'm using a ~/.profile file instead of a
~/.bash_profile file, I guess the installer didn't update it. I just
updated the path like you mentioned and now the new version of Python
comes up.
Rey...
On Mar 2, 6:18 pm, Robert Kern wrote:
> The installer should update your $
On 2009-03-02 17:06, Rey Bango wrote:
Thank you Kevin (& all who replied). The next question (which I think
will be my last until I've read more info) is:
Once installed, how will I be able to distinguish between the OSX
Apple-supplied, preinstalled version and the newly installed version
that
Thank you Kevin (& all who replied). The next question (which I think
will be my last until I've read more info) is:
Once installed, how will I be able to distinguish between the OSX
Apple-supplied, preinstalled version and the newly installed version
that I downloaded from Python.org? Currently,
Rey Bango wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding of the process.
If I download the disk image installer from here:
http://www.pytho
Rey Bango wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding of the process.
If I download the disk image installer from here:
http://www.pytho
In article
<50ca1bd0-b8d5-478c-aeaf-dd2b83187...@j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Rey Bango wrote:
> I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
> on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
> in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding of
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Rey Bango wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
> on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
> in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding of the process.
I'd recommend you put your
Hi,
I'd like to upgrade the installed version of Python that came standard
on OS X (Leopard) with either 2.6.1 or 3.0.1. Before I stick my foot
in it, I just wanted to get a better understanding of the process.
If I download the disk image installer from here:
http://www.python.org/download/
wil
on how to upgrade python to 2.5+ version on
centos 5.2?
thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 20, 3:21 am, Ramashish Baranwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2:03 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Red hat 4 comes with python 2.3, and I am trying to upgrade to python
> > 2.4. So I download and compile the source of python2.4.
>
> > But as I run
On Apr 20, 2:03 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Red hat 4 comes with python 2.3, and I am trying to upgrade to python
> 2.4. So I download and compile the source of python2.4.
>
> But as I run it I get the following error, can you please tell me how
> to fix it?
>
> # /
Hi,
Red hat 4 comes with python 2.3, and I am trying to upgrade to python
2.4. So I download and compile the source of python2.4.
But as I run it I get the following error, can you please tell me how
to fix it?
# /root/src/Python-2.4.4/python ./nov/scripts/stressTestServlet.py ./
nov/scripts/str
Facundo Batista wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>>i am using red hat enterprise 4. It has python 2.3 installed. What is
>>the best way to upgrade to python 2.4?
Very carefully.
All the C libraries that work with Python are version-dependent.
Joh
On Thursday 22 March 2007 15:18, Facundo Batista
wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > i am using red hat enterprise 4. It has
> > python 2.3 installed. What is the best way to
> > upgrade to python 2.4?
> >
> > I think one way is to compile python 2.4 from
> > the source, but I can't remove the o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i am using red hat enterprise 4. It has python 2.3 installed. What is
> the best way to upgrade to python 2.4?
>
> I think one way is to compile python 2.4 from the source, but I can't
> remove the old one since when i do 'rpm -e python', i get error like
> 'failed depe
On 8 Mar, 22:13, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am using red hat enterprise 4. It has python 2.3 installed. What is
> the best way to upgrade to python 2.4?
By installing a version from the source packages available from
python.org.
> I think one way is to compile pyth
On 3/8/07, Sick Monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, sorry I should have added more data.
> You will need to go to rhn.redhat.com and either download the RPM or get the
> url.
>
> So you would do:
> (1) download the rpm to your home directory
> rpm -Uvh nameOfRPM
>
> or
> (2) grab the url
> rp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> i am using red hat enterprise 4. It has python 2.3 installed. What is
> the best way to upgrade to python 2.4?
>
> I think one way is to compile python 2.4 from the source, but I can't
> remove the old one since when i do 'rpm -e python', i get error like
> '
Yeah, sorry I should have added more data.
You will need to go to rhn.redhat.com and either download the RPM or get the
url.
So you would do:
(1) download the rpm to your home directory
rpm -Uvh nameOfRPM
or
(2) grab the url
rpm -Uvh http://urlOfRPM
either way should update your python. Dont
On 3/8/07, Sick Monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried to upgrade the current python RPM?
>
> rpm -Uvh
>
> You can also build from source. Once you get Python 2.4 up and running I am
> pretty sure you can do a symbolic link on the python 2.3 application (either
> in /usr/bin or /u
Have you tried to upgrade the current python RPM?
rpm -Uvh
You can also build from source. Once you get Python 2.4 up and running I am
pretty sure you can do a symbolic link on the python 2.3 application (either
in /usr/bin or /usr/sbin) and point it to the 2.4 python file.
On 8 Mar 2007
Hi,
i am using red hat enterprise 4. It has python 2.3 installed. What is
the best way to upgrade to python 2.4?
I think one way is to compile python 2.4 from the source, but I can't
remove the old one since when i do 'rpm -e python', i get error like
'failed dependencies'.
Thank you for any ide
Tim Roberts wrote:
> Further, as I understand it, Python 2.4 extensions can be built with the
> free "express edition" compiler from Microsoft.
or MinGW.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:55:53 GMT, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed
>the following in comp.lang.python:
>
>> Having learned that lesson the hard way, I now keep a directory with zips
>> and tarballs for all of the add-ins I have installed, and
Tony Meyer wrote:
>> At the moment SourceForge is only listing one (UK) mirror for mingw, and
>> that seems to be down. I'm guessing something is broken, since I know it
>> used to be much more widely available.
>
>
> Only one mirror (Kent) is available for any project. It's been like
> this
> At the moment SourceForge is only listing one (UK) mirror for
> mingw, and
> that seems to be down. I'm guessing something is broken, since I
> know it
> used to be much more widely available.
Only one mirror (Kent) is available for any project. It's been like
this for nearly a day now, a
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Kenneth Long schrieb:
>
>>> Okay if one builds such from sources... but us poor
>>>Windows flunkies
>>>without a build environment have to wait for some
>>>kindly soul to build
>>>the installer compatible with the new Python
>>>version.
>>>
>>
>>especially since I have
>
> The link for pexports-0.42h.zip is broken so I cant
> test it on an extension.
>
pexports is only needed for Python 2.3. It is not required for 2.4 or
2.5.
casevh
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> mingw32 is supported and can compile many
> extensions. See the following
> post:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/8e2260fe4d4b7de9
>
> If you meant something else with your comment,
> please explain.
>
thanks for the reference.. I just got the latest
source for pyt
Anthony Baxter wrote:
> On 21 Oct 2006 21:39:51 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mingw32 is supported and can compile many extensions. See the following
> > post:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/8e2260fe4d4b7de9
> >
> > If you meant something else
Kenneth Long schrieb:
>> Okay if one builds such from sources... but us poor
>> Windows flunkies
>> without a build environment have to wait for some
>> kindly soul to build
>> the installer compatible with the new Python
>> version.
>>
> especially since I havent got MS visual studio...
> and
On 21 Oct 2006 21:39:51 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mingw32 is supported and can compile many extensions. See the following
> post:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/8e2260fe4d4b7de9
>
> If you meant something else with your comment, please explain.
Kenneth Long wrote:
> > Okay if one builds such from sources... but us poor
> > Windows flunkies
> > without a build environment have to wait for some
> > kindly soul to build
> > the installer compatible with the new Python
> > version.
> >
> especially since I havent got MS visual studio...
> Okay if one builds such from sources... but us poor
> Windows flunkies
> without a build environment have to wait for some
> kindly soul to build
> the installer compatible with the new Python
> version.
>
especially since I havent got MS visual studio...
and mingw is not supported... :-(
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>> I just want to upgrade my python version from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4,do I need
>> to uninstall python 2.4.3 first ?
>>
>> I'd rather not to do so, because I have installed some other python
>> packages for python2.4.3.
>
>You don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I just want to upgrade my python version from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4,do I need
> to uninstall python 2.4.3 first ?
>
> I'd rather not to do so, because I have installed some other python
> packages for python2.4.3.
You don't have to uninstall. Installing "on top" will work ju
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just want to upgrade my python version from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4,do I need
> to uninstall python 2.4.3 first ?
afaik, no.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
I just want to upgrade my python version from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4,do I need
to uninstall python 2.4.3 first ?
I'd rather not to do so, because I have installed some other python
packages for python2.4.3.
Thanks.
xiaojf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>...
>
> 2) Give up and install python 2.4 in /usr/local. This leaves me in the
> awkward situation of having to ensure that all our in-house scripts,
> all the time use /usr/local/bin/python.
Or, as recommended, use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This question applies specifically to RHEL 3.0 (actually Whitebox), but
also generally to Redhat and probably pretty much every distribution
that uses python for distribution-related tasks (configuration
managers, rpm package management, yum, etc).
So I want to upgrade to p
This question applies specifically to RHEL 3.0 (actually Whitebox), but
also generally to Redhat and probably pretty much every distribution
that uses python for distribution-related tasks (configuration
managers, rpm package management, yum, etc).
So I want to upgrade to python 2.4 on Whitebox 3.
62 matches
Mail list logo
