On 20-4-2019 12:47, Luuk wrote:
On 20-4-2019 11:26, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
http://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/Archives-Old/UML018/0594.html
[quoot]
> It is simple to make a compacter version of UTF-8 using the base
> 256 character codes were possible (comacter for many languages).
On 20-4-2019 11:26, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
http://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/Archives-Old/UML018/0594.html
[quoot]
> It is simple to make a compacter version of UTF-8 using the base
> 256 character codes were possible (comacter for many languages).
No. If you think otherwise, you ha