Guys, thanks a lot for you answers
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 06 May 2007 14:26:46 -0700, MRAB wrote:
> If it's the comma that makes the tuple, then wouldn't [1, 2] make a 2-
> tuple in a list, ie == [(1, 2)]? Hmm...
Yes, Python creates the tuple 1,2 and then the square brackets turn it
into a list.
I doubt the Python compiler is actually so ineff
On May 6, 4:04 pm, Mel Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vyacheslav Maslov wrote:
> > So, the main question is why using syntax like [X] python constuct list
> > with
> > one item, but when i try to construct tuple with one item using similar
> > syntax (X) python do nothing?
>
> Because `(` and
Vyacheslav Maslov wrote:
> So, the main question is why using syntax like [X] python constuct list
> with
> one item, but when i try to construct tuple with one item using similar
> syntax (X) python do nothing?
Because `(` and `)` are used in expressions to bracket sub-expressions.
a = (4 + 3)
Vyacheslav Maslov wrote:
> So, the main question is why using syntax like [X] python constuct list with
> one item, but when i try to construct tuple with one item using similar
> syntax (X) python do nothing?
Because what determines that you actually have a tuple is the comma, not
the parenthesi
Hi, all!
I found out different behavior of python interpeter related to tuples and
lists with one item only.
I have simple example
print type(())
it's ok, we have just constructed empty tuple
print type((4))
but when i add exactly one item to my tuple i get atomaric int instead of
tuple!!
