In article ,
anon hung wrote:
> >> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
> >> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
> >> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
> >
>>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>>> python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears thing..
>>>
>>> Fir
>>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>>> python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears thing..
>>>
>>> Fir
>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
>> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
>> thing..
>>
>> First of all, is
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:33:55 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> anon hung wrote:
>
>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>> python but a
In article ,
anon hung wrote:
> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
> thing..
>
> First
Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
thing..
First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
