Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 05:08:24PM +, Mark Harrison wrote:
>
>>Is there a way to get rid of those the "self." references, or is this
>>just something I need to get my brain to accept?
>
>
> It's pretty much just something you'll need to get your brain to accept.
> Y
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 05:08:24PM +, Mark Harrison wrote:
> Is there a way to get rid of those the "self." references, or is this
> just something I need to get my brain to accept?
It's pretty much just something you'll need to get your brain to accept.
You can replace self with something sho
Mark Harrison wrote:
> Is there a way to do something equivalent to "import * from self"?
> Perhaps I'm doing something wrong, but I'm having a headache
> when dealing with class instance data, forgetting to always
> put the "self." prefix
>
> For example, in my brain I'm thinking:
>
> op
Mark Harrison wrote:
> For example, in my brain I'm thinking:
>
> optc,args=getopt.getopt(args,cmdopts[cmd][0], cmdopts[cmd][1])
>
> but I'm having to type:
>
> self.optc,self.args=getopt.getopt(self.args,self.cmdopts[self.c
> md][0],
>
Mark Harrison wrote:
> Is there a way to do something equivalent to "import * from self"?
(snip)
>
> Is there a way to get rid of those the "self." references,
No.
> or is this
> just something I need to get my brain to accept?
Yes.
And FWIW, "from somemodule import *" is usually considered bad
Is there a way to do something equivalent to "import * from self"?
Perhaps I'm doing something wrong, but I'm having a headache
when dealing with class instance data, forgetting to always
put the "self." prefix
For example, in my brain I'm thinking:
optc,args=getopt.getopt(args,cmdopts[cm
